Abstract
In Plato’s Protagoras, prompted by Socrates, Protagoras grapples with the complex problem of the nature of the sophistike techne that he professes. To clarify the nature of his teaching, he reconstructs a history of his discipline, identifying a series of figures who preceded him, concealing their own activities under the guise of other technai. Furthermore, through the famous myth of Prometheus, he places the sphere in which he operates, the politike, at the center of the development of human communities. In response to Protagoras, Socrates, through a curious reinterpretation of the past, identifies Spartan brachylogy and the activities of the Seven Sages as precursors to his own philosophy. As is also evident from the comparison with the Ancient Medicine, in the Protagoras, Plato, not without a hint of irony, seems to stage the fifth century intellectuals’ attempt to define their activity through a skillful reworking of human history.
References
Agócs, P., Prauscello, L. (eds.), 2020, Simonides Lyricus. Essays on the ‘Other’ Classical Choral Lyric Poet, Cambridge.
Aguirre Santos, J., Casadesús Bordoy, F., Terceiro Sanmartín, N., Zamora Calvo, J. M. (eds.), 2023, La transmisión del conocimiento en la Atenas democrática, Madrid.
Andolfi, I., 2023, “Hippias Synagoge: An Historiographical Misunderstanding?”, The Classical Journal 118, pp. 253–267.
Arrighetti, G., 2013, “Il Protagora platonico: Esiodo e la genesi dell’uomo”, Athenaeum 101, pp. 25–52.
Athanassaki, L., Martin, R., Miller, J. (eds.), 2009, Apolline Politics and Poetics, Athens.
Audano, S., 2010, “Omero maestro della polis: un dibattito letterario e pedagogico tra Aristofane (Rane, 1030–
1036) e Ippia (fr. 86 B D.-K.)”, in: Leonardelli, Rossi 2010, pp. 3–14.
Bandini, M. (éd.), 2000, Xénophon, Mémorables, vol. I: Introduction générale – Livre I, Paris.
Barney, R., 2019, “Protagoras and the Myth of Plato’s Protagoras”, in: Riedweg 2019, pp. 133–158.
Bassino, P., Benzi, N. (eds.), 2022, Sophistic Views of the Epic Past from the Classical to the Imperial Age, London–New York–Dublin.
Beresford, A., 2013, “Fangs, Feathers, & Fairness: Protagoras on the Origins of Right and Wrong”, in:
van Ophuijsen, van Raalte, Stork 2013, pp. 139–162.
Berger Jr., H., 2021, Couch City. Socrates against Simonides, W. Risvold, J. B. Fuqua (eds.), New York.
Billings, J., Moore, C. (eds.), 2023, The Cambridge Companion to the Sophists, Cambridge–New York.
Bonazzi, M., 2022, “Political, All Too Political. Again on Protagoras’ Myth in Its Intellectual Context”, Polis 39, pp. 425–445.
Brancacci, A., 2002, “Protagora e la techne sophistike. Plat. Prot. 316d–317c”, Elenchos 23, pp. 11–32.
Brittain, C., 2021, “Deinos (wicked good) at interpretation (Protagoras 334–48), in: Harte, Woolf 2021, pp. 32–59.
Cambiano, G., 19912, Platone e le tecniche, Roma–Bari.
Capra, A., 2001, Ἀγὼν λόγων. Il Protagora di Platone tra eristica e commedia, Milano.
Capra, A., 2017, “Edonismo e ironia ‘tragicomica’ sulla scena del Protagora. La rivisitazione di Eraclide Pontico”, in: De Luise 2017, pp. 19–40.
Cole, T. A., 1991, The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece, Baltimore–London.
Collins, J. H., 2015, Exhortations to Philosophy. The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle, Oxford.
Corey, D. D., 2015, The Sophists in Plato’s Dialogues, Albany.
Cornelli, G. (ed.), 2016, Plato’s Styles and Characters. Between Literature and Philosophy, Berlin–New York.
Corradi, M., 2016, “Doing Business with Protagoras (Prot. 313e): Plato and the Construction of a Character”, in: Cornelli 2016, pp. 335–356.
Corradi, M., 2017, “Protagorean Socrates, Socratic Protagoras: a Narrative Strategy from Aristophanes to Plato”, in: Stavru, Moore 2017, pp. 84–104.
Corradi, M., 2020, “«Mon cher frère, arrêtons à nous deux la force de cet homme». Homère, Iliade, XXI, 308–309 = Platon, Protagoras, 340 a: les citations homériques dans l’analyse platonicienne de la pensée de Protagoras”, in: Desclos 2020, pp. 103–121.
Corradi, M., 2021, “La préhistoire de l’humanité dans le mythe d’Aristophane du Banquet de Platon, entre poésie, sophistique et philosophie”, in: Ruggiero 2021, pp. 97–136.
Corradi, M., 2023, “Pericle e l’εὐβουλία di Protagora”, in: Aguirre Santos, Casadesús Bordoy, Terceiro Sanmartín, Zamora Calvo 2023, pp. 91–115.
Corradi, M., 2024, “Ἐγὼ δὲ τὴν σοφιστικὴν τέχνην φημὶ μὲν εἶναι παλαιάν: rappresentazione di sé e uso del passato nel Protagora di Platone”, in: Giuseppetti (in corso di stampa).
De Brasi, D., 2013, L’immagine di Sparta nei dialoghi platonici. Il giudizio di un filosofo su una (presunta) polis modello, Sankt Augustin.
De Luise, F. (cur.), 2017, Il teatro platonico delle virtù, Trento.
De Luise, F., Zavattero, I. (cur.), 2019, La volontarietà dell’azione tra Antichità e Medioevo, Trento.
Delcomminette, S., 2006, Le Philèbe de Platon. Introduction à l’agathologie platonicienne, Leiden–Boston.
Delcomminette, S., Lachance, G. (dir.), 2021, L’éristique: définitions, caractérisations et historicité, Bruxelles.
Denyer, N. (ed.), 2008, Plato. Protagoras, Cambridge–New York.
Desclos, M.-L. (dir.), 2020, Platon citateur. La réappropriation des savoirs antérieurs, Paris.
Dorion, L. A., 2000, “Notes complémentaires”, in: Bandini 2000, pp. 49–172.
Engels, J., 2010, Die sieben Weisen: Leben, Lehren und Legenden, München.
Erler, M., Tornau, C. (hrsg.), 2019, Handbuch Antike Rhetorik, Berlin–Boston.
Fait, P., 2021, “Protagoras’ Attack on Wrestling and the Other Arts: the Cradle of Antilogic and Eristic”, in: Delcomminette, Lachance 2021, pp. 47–81.
Gavray, M.-A., 2021, Protagoras, la lutte et les discours terrassants, in: Delcomminette, Lachance 2021, pp. 23–46.
Giuliano, F. M., 1991, “Esegesi letteraria in Platone: la discussione sul carme simonideo nel Protagora”, Studi classici e orientali 46, pp. 105–190 (= 2004, Studi di letteratura greca, Pisa, pp. 1–86).
Giuseppetti, M. (cur.), 2024, La cultura sofistica fra occasione e permanenza: nuove prospettive di ricerca, Roma 2024.
Harte, V., Woolf, R. (eds.), 2021, Rereading Ancient Philosophy. Old Chestnuts and Sacred Cows, Cambridge–New York.
Havlíček, A., Karfík, F. (eds.), 2003, Plato’s Protagoras. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Platonicum Pragense, Praha.
Heinimann, F., 1961, “Eine vorplatonische Theorie der τέχνη”, Museum Helveticum 18, pp. 105–130 (= Classen, C. J. (hrsg.), 1976, Sophistik, Darmstadt, pp. 127–169).
Heßler, J. E., 2019, “Rede und die Entwicklung der Redekunst vor den Sophisten”, in: Erler, Tornau 2019, pp. 19–53.
Hunter, R., 2020, “«Clever about Verses?». Plato and the ‘Scopas Ode’ (PMG 542 = 260 Poltera)”, in: Agócs, Prauscello 2020, pp. 197–216.
Hussey, E., 2021, “Protagoras on Political technê”, in: Johansen 2021, pp. 15–38.
Jong, I. J. F. de, Sullivan, J. P. (eds.), 1994, Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature, Leiden–New York–Köln.
Johansen, T. K. (ed.), 2021, Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy. The Concept of Technê, Cambridge–New York.
Jouanna, J., 1992, Hippocrate, Paris (eng. tr. 1999, Baltimore–London).
Kierstead, J., 2021, “Is Protagoras’ Great Speech on Democracy?”, Polis 38, pp. 199–207.
Kirk, A., 2021, Ancient Greek Lists. Catalogue and Inventory across Genres, Cambridge–New York.
Kurke, L., 2011, Aesopic Conversations. Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose, Princeton–Oxford.
Laks, A., Most, G. (eds.), 2016, Early Greek Philosophy, vol. I–IX, Cambridge–London.
Leonardelli, F., Rossi, G. (cur.), 2010, Officina humanitatis. Studi in onore di Lia de Finis, Trento.
Manuwald, B. (hrsg.), 1999, Platon. Protagoras, Göttingen.
Manuwald, B., 2013, “Protagoras’ Myth in Plato’s Protagoras: Fiction or Testimony?”, in: van Ophuijsen,
van Raalte, Stork 2013, pp. 163–177.
Marino, S., 2019, Il corpo del dialogo: una teoria della comunicazione a partire dal Protagora di Platone e dal Corpus Hippocraticum, Napoli.
Montanari, F. (ed.), 2020, History of Ancient Greek Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Byzantine Age, Leiden–Boston.
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., Rengakos, A. (eds.), 2015, Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. 1–2, Leiden–Boston.
Moore, C., 2016, “Spartan Philosophy and Sage Wisdom in Plato’s Protagoras”, Epoché 20, pp. 281–305.
Moore, C., 2020, Calling Philosophers Names. On the Origin of a Discipline, Princeton–Oxford.
Morgan, K. A., 2009, “Philosophy at Delphi: Socrates, Sages, and the Circulation of Wisdom”, in: Athanassaki, Martin, Miller 2009, pp. 549–568.
Morgan, K. A., 2022, “Mythological Role-Playing among the Sophists”, in: Bassino, Benzi 2022, pp. 89–112.
Most, G., 1994, “Simonides’ ode to Scopas in contexts”, in: de Jong, Sullivan 1994, pp. 127–152.
Nathan, A. R., 2017, “Protagoras’ Great Speech”, The Classical Quarterly 67, pp. 380–399.
Novokhatko, A., 2020, “The Origins and Growth of Scholarship in Pre-Hellenistic Greece”, in: Montanari 2020, pp. 9–131.
Ophuijsen, J. van, Raalte, M. van, Stork, P. (eds.), 2013, Protagoras of Abdera. The Man, His Measure, Leiden–New York.
Palumbo, L., 2017, “I giovani, i sofisti e la virtù. Sul teatro filosofico del Protagora”, in: De Luise 2017, pp. 61–79.
Pfeiffer, R., 1968, History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.
Race, W. H., 1982, The Classical Priamel from Homer to Boethius, Leiden.
Ramírez Vidal, G., 2016, La invención de los sofistas, México.
Riedweg, C. (hrsg.), 2019, Philosophie für die Polis. Akten des 5. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2016, Berlin–Boston.
Robinson, T. M., 2003, Protagoras, the Protagoras and the Dissoi logoi, in: Havlíček, Karfík 2003, pp. 233–245.
Rossetti, L., 2015, La filosofia non nasce con Talete e nemmeno con Socrate, Bologna.
Rossetti, L., 2017, “Il Gorgia somiglia ben poco al Protagora”, in: De Luise 2017, pp. 103–127.
Rossetti, L., 2020, Verso la filosofia: nuove prospettive su Parmenide, Zenone e Melisso, N. S. Galgano, S. Giombini, F. Marcacci (cur.), Baden-Baden.
Rossetti, L., Stavru, A. (cur.), 2008, Socratica 2005. Studi sulla letteratura socratica antica presentati alle Giornate di studio di Senigallia, Bari.
Ruggiero, R., Vox, O. (cur.), 2021, Miti e mitologie tra creazione e interpretazione – Mythes et mythologies entre création et interprétation, Lecce.
Sassi, M. M., 2019, “Socrate salvato dal suo isolamento. La ‘discussione’ con Simonide, Euripide e Gorgia sulla volontà morale”, in: De Luise, Zavattero 2019, pp. 63–85.
Sassi, M. M., 2021, “rev. Moore (2020)”, Philosophie antique 21, pp. 265–269.
Schiappa, E., 1999, The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece, New Haven–London.
Schiefsky, M. J. (ed.), 2005, Hippocrates, On Ancient Medicine, Leiden–Boston.
Sommerville, B., 2019, “Sophistry and the Promethean Crafts in Plato’s Protagoras”, The Classical Quarterly 69, pp. 126–146.
Stavru, A., Moore, C. (eds.), 2017, Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, Leiden–New York.
Sterke, E. J. de, 2022, Das Maß des Menschen. Platons Antwort an Protagoras im ‘Theaitetos’ und im ‘Protagoras’, Leiden–Boston.
Thomas, R., 2003, “Epideixis and Written Publication in the Late Fifth and Early Fourth Centuries”, in: Yunis 2003, pp. 162–187.
Tordesillas, A., 2021, “Anthropologie et politique: du ‘Prométhée’ de Protagoras au ‘Prométhée’ de Platon”, in: Ruggiero, Vox 2021, pp. 41–95.
Tulli, M., 2008, “Isocrate storico del pensiero: Antistene, Platone, gli eristi nell’Encomio di Elena”, in: Rossetti, Stavru 2008, pp. 91–105.
Yunis, H. (ed.), 2003, Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge–New York.
Zhmud, L., 2006, The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity, Berlin–New York.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.