Abstract
The approach I propose here to Books VI and VII of Plato’s Republic is to offer some reflections on the organicist and perspectivist readings. Perspectivism seems in some respects to be a variant of organicism. Indeed, both approaches allow for a reassessment not only of the various parts that make up a dialogue, but also, more generally, of the importance of the literary or dramatic form, which is marginalised by the evolutionist reading. The aim of this essay is therefore to try to understand some of the images present in the central books of the Republic, without burdening them with theoretical structures and questionable chronologies, but rather by noting their importance in the overall design of the individual text and their consistence within a broader organism, the entire and unitary Platonic corpus of dialogues. To this end, I will try to highlight the subtle differences between organicism and perspectivism. I will focus on the relationship between literary constructions and theoretical speculations that make the Republic an organically unified text in itself and perfectly consistent with the entire corpus of dialogues. Three images in particular will help me to show how literature and philosophy meet: the sun analogy, the divided line and the allegory of the cave. My aim is not to say what exactly the epistemology of the central books of the Republic consists in, but rather to try to identify the pitfalls in the text when philosophical questions about epistemological issues are separated from literary ones.
References
Blondell, R., 2002, The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues, Cambridge.
Bonazzi, M. (cur.), 2010, Platone, Menone, Torino.
Bonazzi, M. (cur.), 2011, Platone, Fedro, Torino.
Brandwood, L., 1990, The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues, Cambridge.
Broadie, S., 2021, Plato’s Sun-Like Good: dialectic in the Republic, Cambridge.
Burnyeat, M. F., 1997, “First Words: A Valedictory Lecture”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 43, pp. 1–20.
Calabi, F., 2003, Il sole e la sua luce, in: Vegetti 2003b, pp. 327–354.
Cambiano, G., 1988, “I filosofi e la costrizione a governare nella Repubblica platonica”, in: Casertano 1988, pp. 43–58.
Casanova, A., 2013, “La mimesis platonica e la fondazione della kallipolis: gioco e serietà, coerenza e contraddizione”, in: Notomi, Brisson 2013, pp. 330–335.
Casertano, G. (cur.), 1988, I filosofi e il potere nella società e nella cultura antiche, Napoli.
Casertano, G. (cur.), 2000, La struttura del dialogo platonico, Napoli.
Centrone, B., (cur.), 2012, Platone, Repubblica, Milano.
Centrone, B., 2000, “Platone e la scrittura filosofica: alcune precisazioni sul dibattito attuale,” in: Aa.Vv., La scrittura filosofica. Generi letterari, destinatari, finalità e forme della scrittura filosofica, Ferrara–Roma, pp. 165–182.
Cerri, G., 2000, Dalla dialettica all’epos: Platone, Repubblica X, Timeo, Crizia, in: Casertano 2000, pp. 7–34
Cotton, A. K., 2012, Platonic Dialogue and the Education of the Reader, Oxford.
Dorandi, T., 2007, Nell’officina dei classici, Roma.
Erler, M., 2008, Platone. Un’introduzione, trad. it. Torino.
Ferrari, F., 2014, Platone. Il governo dei filosofi (Repubblica VI), Venezia.
Ferrari, F., 2017, “Natura e costrizione nel paragone della caverna”, ΠΗΓΗ / FONS, 2, pp. 123–135
Ferrari, F., 2022, La Repubblica di Platone, Bologna.
Ferrari, G. F. R., 2010, “Socrates in the Republic”, in: McPherran 2010, pp. 11–31.
Fink J. L. (ed.), 2012, The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge.
Franco Repellini, F., 2003, La linea e la caverna, in: Vegetti 2003b, pp. 355–403.
Gonzalez, F. J., 2013, “Plato’s Perspectivism”, Plato Journal, 13, pp. 31–48
Ierodiakonou, K., 2005, “Plato’s Theory of Colours in the Timaeus”, Rhizai, 2, pp. 219–233.
Kahn, C., 2012, “The Philosophical Importance of the Dialogue Form for Plato”, in: Fink 2012, pp. 158–173 [precedentemente in: Kahn, C., 2005, “The Philosophical Importance of the Dialogue Form for Plato”, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 26.1, pp. 13–28].
Mársico, C., 2013, Alegorías del sol, la línea y la caverna, Buenos Aires.
McPherran, M. L. (ed.), 2010, Plato’s Republic, Cambridge.
Motta, A., 2018, λόγους ποιεῖν. L’eredità platonica e il superamento dell’aporia dei dialoghi, Napoli.
Motta, A., 2023, “The theme and target of Plato’s dialogues in Neoplatonist cosmo-literary theory”, CQ 73.1, pp. 78–89.
Nightingale, A. W., 1995, Genres in dialogue. Plato and the construct of philosophy, Cambridge.
Notomi, N., Brisson, L. (eds.), 2013, Dialogues on Plato’s Politeia (Republic), Sankt Augustin.
Nucci, M., (cur.), 2014, Platone, Simposio, Torino.
Palumbo, L., 2008, Mimesis. Rappresentazione, teatro e mondo nei dialoghi di Platone e nella Poetica di Aristotele, Napoli.
Palumbo, L., 2020, “Socrate o dello specchio. Strategie di scrittura nell’Apologia e nell’Alcibiade”, Plato Journal, 20, pp. 81–95.
Palumbo, L., 2024, Platone demiurgo del testo e del mondo. Sulla poetica dei Dialoghi, Napoli.
Petrucci, F. M. (cur.), 2014, Platone, Gorgia, Torino
Petrucci, F. M. (cur.), 2022, Platone, Timeo, Milano.
Press, G. A., (ed.), 1993, Plato’s Dialogues: New Studies and Interpretations, Lanham.
Press, G. A., (ed.), 2000, Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity, New York–Oxford.
Schofield, M., 2023, How Plato writes, Cambridge.
Szlezák, T. A., 1998, Platone e la scrittura della filosofia, Milano.
Thesleff, H., 1982, Studies in Platonic Chronology, Helsinki.
Trabattoni, F., 2021, Eros antico. Un percorso filosofico e letterario, Roma.
Tulli, M., Erler, M. (eds.), 2016, Plato in Symposium, Sankt Augustin.
Vegetti, M., (cur.), 2007, Platone, La Repubblica, Milano.
Vegetti, M., 1998, “Katabasis”, in: Vegetti 1998, pp. 93–104.
Vegetti, M. (cur.), 1998, Platone, La Repubblica, vol. I, Napoli.
Vegetti, M., 2003a, “Megiston mathema. L’idea del “buono” e le sue funzioni”, in: Vegetti 2003b, pp. 253–286.
Vegetti M. (cur.), 2003b, Platone, La Repubblica, vol. V, Napoli.
Vegetti, M., 2016, “Immortalità personale senza anima immortale: Diotima e Aristotele”, in: Tulli, Erler 2016, pp. 321–333.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.