Abstract
In Republic V 474b3–480a13, Plato initiates a discussion that is intended to define who the philosophers are that must rule the city. In the context of this discussion, we are told that the sight-lovers are among the pretenders to the title of the philosopher. This paper addresses the following questions about the sight-lovers: “Who are the sight-lovers of Republic V?”; “Do they maintain some kind of coherent ontological position?”; and, “If they do, then what is its content, and how does Plato attempt to rebut it?”. In particular, it is argued that: (1) The sight-lovers of Republic V maintain that the objects of our everyday experience are bundles of things such as colors and shapes; (2) Plato presents his own position about the nature of concrete particulars in the Phaedo (Phd. 102a11–103a3); (3) This discussion in the Phaedo may facilitate our effort to place the sight-lovers thesis in its proper setting and also parse its finer details; and (4) Plato spells out his critique of the sight-lovers’ position in Republic VII (R. 523a5–524d4) in the context of his treatment of the summoners.
References
Annas, J., 1981, An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford.
Baltzly, D., 1997, “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79, pp. 239–272.
Bergman, G., 1967, Realism, Madison.
Colvin, M., 2007, “Heraclitean Flux and Unity of Opposites in Plato’s Theaetetus and Cratylus,” Classical Quarterly 57, pp. 759–769.
Cooper, J. M. (ed.), 1997, Plato, Complete Works, Indianapolis.
Cross, R. C., Woozley, A. D., 1964, Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary, London.
Duke, E. A. et al. (eds.), 1995, Platonis Opera, T. I, Oxford.
Fine, G., 1978, “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 60, pp. 121–139.
Fine, G., “Knowledge and True Belief in the Meno,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27, pp. 41–81.
Gosling, J. C. B., 1968, “Doxa and Dunamis in Plato’s Republic,” Phronesis 13, pp. 119–130.
Heidel, W. A., 1906, “Qualitative Change in Presocratic Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19 (3), pp. 333–379.
Hesiod, 2009, Theogony and Works and Days, transl. M. L. West, Oxford.
Hume, D., 2008, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, P. Millican, P. (ed.). Oxford.
Irwin, T. H., 1977, “Plato’s Heracleiteanism,” Philosophical Quarterly 27, pp. 1–13.
Kahn, C. H., 1979, The Art and Thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S., 1962, Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments, 2nd edition, Cambridge.
Koslicki, K., 2018, Form, Matter, Substance, Oxford.
Locke, J., 1998, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London.
Loux, M., Crisp, T. M., 2017, Metaphysics, 4th edition, London.
Moss, J., 2021, Plato’s Epistemology. Being and Seeming, Oxford.
McKirahan, R., 1994, Philosophy Before Socrates, Indianapolis.
Mourelatos, A., 2008, “Heraclitus, Parmenides and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things,” in: Mourelatos, A. (ed.), The Route of Parmenides (Revised and Expanded Edition), pp. 299–332, Las Vegas.
Nehamas, A., 2024, “What Do We Learn About Philosophers and Philosophy in Republic V?,” Unpublished manuscript.
Panayides, C., 1999, “Aristotle on the Priority of Actuality in Substance,” Ancient Philosophy 19, pp. 327–344.
Peramatzis, M., 2011, Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford.
Quine, W. V., 1954, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge.
Russell, B., 1940, Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, London.
Russell, B., 1956, Logic and Knowledge, R. Marsh (ed.), London.
Slings. S. (ed.), 2003, Platonis Respublica, Oxford.
Smith, N. D., 2012, “Plato on the Power of Ignorance,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, suppl. vol., pp. 51–73.
Smith, N. D., 2019, Summoning Knowledge in Plato’s Republic, Oxford.
Williams, D. C., 1953, “On the Elements of Being: I,” The Review of Metaphysics 7, pp. 3–18.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christos Y. Panayides
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.