Abstract
What kind of causality does the Aristotelian Prime Mover exert on the heaven? Who “loves” the Prime Mover? Renaissance peripatetic philosopher, Francesco Vimercato, a “royal” teacher of “Greek and Latin philosophy” in Paris during the forties and the fifties of the 16th century tried to resolve these traditional puzzles that resulted from the exegesis of the Metaphysics XII, 6–7. His solution appears to be innovative, if compared to the ancient and the medieval ones. It seems partially to prefigure the last two decades’ interpretations of Aristotelian “theology”.
References
Berti, E., 2004, Da chi è amato il Motore Immobile? (Su Aristotele, Metaph. XII 6–7), in Id., Dalla dialettica alla filosofia prima con saggi integrativi, Milano, p. 616–650.
Berti, E., 2005, Il dibattito odierno sulla cosiddetta “teologia” di Aristotele, in Nuovi studi aristotelici, II, Brescia, s. 489–500 (prima ed. dell’art. 2003).
Berti, E., 2009 Il movimento del cielo in Alessandro di Afrodisia in Id., Nuovi studi aristotelici, IV/1, Brescia, p. 77–88 (prima ed. dell’art. 2000).
Bodéüs, R., Aristote et la théologie des vivants immortels. Montréal–Paris.
Broadie, S., 1993, “Que fait le premier moteur d’Aristote? (Sur la théologie du livre Lambda de la “Métaphysique”)”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’etranger 183, p. 375–411.
Facca, D., 2009, “Przekłady Aleksandra z Afrodyzji i myśl renesansu” [Le traduzioni di Alessandro di Afrodisia e il pensiero del Rinascimento], Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce 53, p. 213–230.
Fazzo, S., 2009, “Fra atto e potenza: l’eternitá del cielo nel libro Lambda della Metafisica”, in: Attivitá e virtù. Anima e corpo in Aristotele, (cur.) A. Fermani, M. Migliori, Milano, s. 113–146.
Forlivesi, M., 2009, “Approaching the Debate on the Subject of Metaphysics from the Later Middle Ages to the Early Modern Age: The Ancient and Medieval Antecedents”, Medioevo 34 2009, p. 9–59, anche su http://web.tiscali.it/marcoforlivesi/mf.htm
Giacon, C., 1969, La causalità del motore immobile, Padova.
Gilbert, N.W., 1965, “Francesco Vimercato of Milan: a Bio-Bibliography”, Studies in the Renaissance 12, p. 188–217.
Genequand Ch. (ed.), 1896, Ibn Rushd’s Metaphysics. A Translation with Introduction with Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Lām, Leiden 1986
Hasse, D.N., 2004, “Aufstieg und Niedergang des Averroismus in der Renaissance: Niccolò Tignosi, Agostino Nifo, Francesco Vimercato”, in: Herbst des Mittelalters?: Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts (Miscellanea Medievalia 31), hrsg. von J.A. Aertsen und M. Pickavé, Berlin, p. 447–473.
Kraye, J., 1991, “Alexander of Aphrodisias, Gianfrancesco Beati and the problem of Metaphysics a”, in: Renaissance Society and Culture, ed. by J. Monfasani and R.G. Musto, New York, p. 137–160.
Lagarde, B., 1973, “Le De Differentiis de Pléthon d’après l’autographe de la Marcienne”, Byzantion 43, p. 312–343.
Ong, W.J., 1958 (2004), Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialogue, Chicago.
Reale, G. (cur.), 1993 Aristotle, Metafisica, 3 vol., edizione maggiorata e rinnovata, Milano.
Ross, W.D., 1953, Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford.
Schmitt, Ch.B., 1967, Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his critique of Aristotle, The Hague.
License
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.