Keywords
Apeiros
boundless
Phusis
nature
How to Cite
Abstract
The usual interpretation has it that Anaximander made ‘the Boundless’ (τὸ ἄπειρον) the source and principle of everything. However, in the works of Aristotle, the nearest witness, no direct connection can be found between Anaximander and ‘the Boundless’. On the contrary, Aristotle says that all the physicists made something else the subject of which ἄπειρος is a predicate (Phys. 203 a 4). When we take this remark seriously, it must include Anaximander as well. This means that Anaximander did not make τὸ ἄπειρον the source or principle of everything, but rather called something else ἄπειρος. The question is, then, what was the subject that he adorned with this predicate. The hypothesis defended in this article is that it must have been ϕύσις, not in its Aristotelian technical sense, but in the pregnant sense of natura creatrix: the power that brings everything into existence and makes it grow and move. This ‘nature’ is boundless. It rules everything and in this sense it can be called ‘divine’. Being boundless, the mechanisms of nature, in which the opposites play an important role, are multifarious. The things created by boundless nature are not boundless, but finite, as they are destined to the destruction they impose onto each other, as Anaximander’s fragment says.
References
Barnes, J., 1982, The Presocratic Philosophers, London.
Burch, G. B., 1949, “Anaximander, the First Metaphysician”, RMeta 3, pp. 137–160.
Burnet, J., 1920, Early Greek Philosophy, London.
Chantraine, P., 1933, La formation des noms en grec ancien, Paris.
Conche, M., 1986, Héraclite: Fragments, Paris.
Conche, M., 1991, Anaximandre. Fragments et témoignages, Paris.
Couprie, D. L., 2001, “πρηστήρος αὐλος revisited”, Apeiron 34, pp. 193–202.
Couprie, D. L., 2011, Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology. From Thales to Heraclides Ponticus, New York.
Dancy, R. M., 1989, “Thales, Anaximander, and Infinity”, Apeiron 22, pp. 149–190.
De Vogel, C. J., 1957, Greek Philosophy: A Collection of Texts Selected and Supplied with Some Notes and Explanations I: Thales to Plato, Leiden.
Diels, H., Kranz, W., 1951/1952, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch. I–III, Zürich and Hildesheim [= DK].
Drozdek, A., 2008, In the Beginning was the Apeiron: Infinity in Greek Philosophy, Stuttgart.
Dührsen, N. C., 2013. “Anaximander”, in: H. Flashar, D. Bremer, and G. Rechenauer (eds.), Frühgriechische Philosophie (Die Philosophie der Antike 1, 1, Basel), pp. 263–320.
Dumont, J.-P., 1988, Les Présocratiques, Paris.
Fehling, D., 1994, Materie und Weltbau in der Zeit der frühen Vorsokratiker, Innsbruck.
Finkelberg, A., 1993, “Anaximander’s Conception of the apeiron”, Phronesis 38, pp. 229–256.
Gottschalk, H. B., 1965, “Anaximander’s Apeiron”, Phronesis 10, pp. 37–53.
Graham, D. W., 2003, “Does Nature Love to Hide? Heraclitus B123 DK”, Classical Philology 98, pp. 175–179.
Graham, D. W., 2006, Explaining the Cosmos. The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy, Princeton/ Oxford.
Graham, D. W., 2010, The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. the Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics I, Cambridge [= Gr].
Gregory, A., 2011, “Anaximander’s Zoogony”, in: M. Rosetto, M.Tsianikas, G. Couvalis, and M. Palaktsoglou (Eds.), Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, Flinders University June 2009, pp. 44–53
Guthrie, W. K. C., 1985, A History of Greek Philosophy I. The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Cambridge.
Havelock, E. A., 1983, “The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics”, in: K. Robb (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, pp. 7–82.
Heidel, W. A., 1910, “περὶ ϕύσεως”, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 45, pp. 79–133
Jaeger, W., 1947, The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers, London.
Jaspers, K., 1957, “Anaximander”, in: Die großen Philosophen, Volume I: Aus dem Ursprung denkende Metaphysiker, München, pp. 17–22.
Kahn, C. H., 1979, The Art and Thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge.
Kahn, C. H., 1994, Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, Indianapolis/Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S., 1954, Heraclitus: the Cosmic Fragments, Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J.E., Schofield, M., 2007, The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, Cambridge etc.
Kočandrle, R., 2010, Anaximandros z Mílétu [Anaximander of Miletus], Červený Kostelec.
Kočandrle, R., 2011, Apeiron Anaximandra z Mílétu [The Apeiron of Anaximander of Miletus], Plzeň/Praha.
Kočandrle, R., 2011, “Apeiron jako bezmezná přirozenost” [“Apeiron as the Boundless Nature”], Aithér 6, pp. 9–38.
Kočandrle, R., Kleisner, K., 2013, “Evolution Born of Moisture: Analogies and Parallels between Anaximander’s Ideas on Origin of Life and Man and Later Pre-Darwinian and Darwinian Evolutionary Concepts”, Journal of the History of Biology 46, pp. 103–124.
Kratochvíl, Z., 2010, Mezi mořem a nebem. Odkaz iónské archaické vnímavosti. [Between the Sea and the Heaven. Legacy of Archaic Ionian Sensibility], Červený Kostelec.
Lebedev, A. V., 1978, “ΤΟ ΑΠΕΙΡΟΝ: НЕ АНАКСИМАНДР, А ПЛАТОН И АРИСТОТЕЛЬ I–II”, Вестник древней истории 143, pp. 39–54 and 144, pp. 43–58.
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., 1996, A Greek-English Lexico, revised by H. S. Jones & R. McKenzie. Oxford.
Mckirahan, R. D., 2001, “Anaximander’s Infinite Worlds”, in: A.Preus (ed.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy VI: Before Plato, Albany.
Mouraviev, S., 2006, Heraclitea III.3B/iii, Sankt Augustin.
Naddaf, G., 2005, The Greek Concept of Nature, Albany.
Patzer, H., 1993, “Physis. Grundlegung zu einer Geschichte des Wortes”, Sitzungsberichte der wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe–Universität Frankfurt am Main 30, pp. 217–277.
Pohlenz, M., 1953, “Nomos und Phusis”, Hermes 81, pp. 418–438.
Schmalzriedt, E., 1970, PERI PHUSEOS: Zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel, München.
Seligman, P., 1962, The Apeiron of Anaximander: A Study in the Origin and Function of Metaphysical Ideas, London.
Semerano, G., 2001, L’infinito: un equivoco millenari: Le antiche civiltà del Vicino Oriente e le origini del pensiero greco, Milano.
Solmsen F., 1962, “Anaximander’s Infinite: Traces and Influences”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 44, pp. 109–31.
Tannery, P., 1904, “Pour l’histoire du mot ‘apeiron’”, Revue de philosophie 5, pp. 703–707, repr. in: Mémoires scientifiques VII: Philosophie ancienne (ed. J. L. Heiberg), Toulouse-Paris 1925, pp. 309–314.
Wicksteed, PH., Cornford, F. M., 1957, Aristotle: The Physics, London.
Wöhrle G., (Hrsg.), 2009, Die Milesier: Thales, Berlin [= TP 1].
Wöhrle G., (Hrsg.), 2012, Die Milesier: Anaximander und Anaximenes, Berlin/Boston [= TP 2].
License
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.