Keywords
post-industrial city
work
biopolitical production
fatigue
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyze modern urban space in the context of intercepting the effects of biopolitical production by means of a conceptual apparatus taken from urban landscape studies. Among the discussed sections of urban space, which illustrate the issue undertaken in this text, there are first and foremost places that focalize and intertwine practices of urban design, landscape architecture, design and media initiated by local governments, institutions, and private investors. All of these practices strive to create a new type of urban landscapes, characterized by their simultaneous functioning as sights and as “urban stages.” Following from the above findings, this paper aims to describe the listed forms of land use in terms derived from cultural concepts of landscape, considering the latter to be a useful tool for explaining the relations between modern urban subjects and the environment they exist in.References
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and other essays, translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.
Bednarek, Joanna. 2012. “Praca biopolityczna i nowy skład klasowy” [“Biopolitical Labor and the New Class Content”]. Praktyka Teoretyczna 5. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2012.5.16.
Berardi, Franco. 2012. The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Chase, John L., Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski. 2008. Everyday Urbanism. New York: The Monacelli Press.
Crary, John. 2013. 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso.
Flint, Anthony. 2014. “Who really owns public spaces.” Citylab, June 30. https://www.citylab.com/design/2014/06/who-really-owns-public-spaces/373612/.
Frydryczak, Beata. 2013. Krajobraz. Od estetyki picturesque do doświadczenia topograficznego [Landscape: From the Aesthetics of the Picturesque to Topographic Experience]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk.
Gehl, Jan. 2011, Life Between the Buildings: Using Public Space. Translated by Jo Koch, Washington, Island Press.
Wasieczko, Agnieszka. “Hansen po 30 latach” [“Hansen 30 Years On”]. Exit. Nowa Sztuka w Polsce 95 (3). http://kwartalnik.exit.art.pl/article.php?edition=50&id=840&lang=pl.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, David. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
Juskowiak, Piotr. 2015. “Wywłaszczająca urbanizacja. Miejski marksizm wobec problemu akumulacji pierwotnej” [“Dispossessing Urbanization: Urban Marxism in the Face of the Problem of Primitive Accumulation” ]. Praktyka teoretyczna 2. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2015.2.3.
Levinas, Emanuel. 1978. Existence and Existents. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. Electronic version.
Mitchell, Don. 2000. Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Rabinbach, Anson. 1992. Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue and the Origins of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rewers, Ewa. 2015. “Miejska przestrzeń kulturowa: od laboratorium do warsztatu” [“Urban Cultural Space: From a Laboratory to a Workshop”]. In Kulturowe Studia Miejskie [Cultural Urban Studies], edited by Ewa Rewers, 21-63. Warsaw: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
Szlendak, Tomasz and Krzysztof Olechnicki. 2017. Nowe praktyki kulturowe Polaków. Megaceremoniały i subświaty. [New Cultural Practices Among Poles: Megaceremonials and Subworlds]. Warsaw: PWN.
Zukin, Sharon. 1991. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zukin, Sharon. 1995. The Cultures of Cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.