Peri-Urban Development as a Significant Rural Development Trend

Main Article Content

Jadwiga Biegańska
Stefania Środa-Murawska
Zenija Kruzmetra
Frank Swiaczny


The paper focuses on demographic and social changes caused by peri-urban development in rural areas in Latvia, Poland, and Germany after the system transformation began. The article analyses peri-urban development as a mostly rural phenomenon, and as a process of rural displacement. Rural development interacts with urban influences, changing the role and functions of rural areas. This is reflected by a departure from agricultural functions, more intensive construction activities and changes in land use. This also includes intensive socio-demographic and socio-cultural changes. Simultaneously there are significant population inflows, both urban and rural (from more peripheral rural areas), an increase in population density, changes of population structure etc. The paper shows that peri-urban development as a general rural trend began later in the countries of Eastern and Central Europe (after the transformation) than in Western Europe, but the processes and phenomena presently observed in Eastern and Western Europe are similar.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Biegańska, J., Środa-Murawska, S., Kruzmetra, Z., & Swiaczny, F. (2018). Peri-Urban Development as a Significant Rural Development Trend. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(2), 125–140.


  1. Atkinson A., 1999. Principles and Components of a Strategic EPM process relevant to the peri-urban interface (PUI). Online: (accessed 12 December 2016).
  2. Aydalot P., 1985. Le développement de la périurbanisation en France (The development of periurbanisation in France). DISP 80/81: 84–89.
  3. Aydalot P., Garnier A., 1985. Périurbanisation et suburbanisation: des concepts à définir (Peri-urbanisation and suburbanisation: Concepts to be defined). DISP 80/81: 53–55.
  4. Bähr J., 1997. Bevölkerungsgeographie (Population geography). UTB, Stuttgart.
  5. Basten L., 2005. Postmoderner urbanismus. Gestaltung in der städtischen Peripherie (Postmodern urbanism. Design in the urban periphery). LIT Verlag, Münster.
  6. Bengs C., Schmidt-Thomé K., 2006. ESPON 1.1.2. Urban-rural relations in Europe. Final report. ESPON, Luxembourg. Online: (accessed: 12 November 2017).
  7. Berry B.J.L., 1976. The counterurbanisation process: Urban America since 1970. Urban Affairs Annual Review 11: 17–30.
  8. Berry B.J.L., 1978. The counterurbanisation process: How general? In: Hansen N.M. (ed.), Human settlement systems: International perspectives on structure change and public policy. Ballinger, Cambridge Mass.: 25–49.
  9. Biegańska J., 2013. Rural areas in Poland from a demographic perspective. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 20: 7–22.
  10. Biegańska J., Szymańska D., 2013. The scale and the dynamics of permanent migration in rural and peri-urban areas in Poland – some problems. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 21: 21–30.
  11. Bocz G.A., Nilsson C., Pinzke S., 2008. Peri-urbanity – a new classification model, rural futures: Dreams, dilemmas, dangers. Compilation. Online: (accessed 8 December 2016).
  12. Brueckner J.K., 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23(2): 160–171.
  13. Budner W.W., 2008. Procesy metropolizacji i rozwoju metropolii w Polsce (The processes of metropolisation and development of metropolises in Poland). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Administratio Locorum 7(1): 5–16.
  14. Caruso G., 2001. Periurbanisation, the situation in Europe: A bibliographical note and survey of studies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Italy and the Nordic Countries. Final report. Online: (accessed: 7 November 2017).
  15. Cavailhes J., Peeters D., Sekeris E., Thisse J., 2004. The peri-urban city: Why to live between the suburbs and the countryside. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34: 681–703.
  16. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, 2017. Resident population at the beginning of the year. Electronic database (accessed: 5 November 2017).
  17. Champion A., Vandermotten C., 1997. Migration, counterurbanization and regional restructuring in Europe. In: Blotevogel H.H., Fielding A.J. (eds.), People, jobs and mobility in the new Europe. Wiley, Chichester: 69–90.
  18. Cloke P., Goodwin M., 1992. Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-Fordism to rural structured coherence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17: 321–336.
  19. Czerny M., 2005. Globalizacja i rozwój. Wybrane zagadnienia geografii gospodarczej świata (Globalisation and development. Selected issues concerning global economic geography). PWN, Warszawa.
  20. Dahms F., McComb J., 1999. ‘Counterurbanization’, interaction and functional change in a rural amenity area – A Canadian example. Journal of Rural Studies 16(2): 129–146.
  21. Dahs A., 2017. Role of the socioeconomic factors and regional policy in the demographic development of Latvia. Doctoral Thesis. University of Latvia, Riga.
  22. Dezert B., Metton A., Steinberg J., Garnier J.B., 1991. La périurbanisation en France (Periurbanisation in France). S.E.D.E.S., Paris.
  23. Dymitrow M., Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., 2017. Deprivation and the rural-urban trap. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, early view: 1–22. DOI 10.1111/tesg.12263.
  24. Dymitrow M., Stenseke M., 2016. Rural-urban blurring and the subjectivity within. Rural landscapes: Society, environment, history 3(1): 1–13.
  25. Eberhardt P., 1998. Problematyka narodowościowa Łotwy (The issue of nationality in Latvia). Zeszyty Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN 54. IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
  26. Fielding A.J., 1989. Migration and urbanization in Western Europe since 1950. The Geographical Journal 155: 60–69.
  27. Ford T., 1999. Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region. International Journal of Population Geography 5: 297–311.
  28. Friedrich K., Knabe S., Warner B., 2014. Kontinuität und Umbrüche im suburbanen Mosaik Sachsen-Anhalts: die Zukunft eines Wohnungsmarktsegments im demographischen Wandel (Continuity and breaks in the suburban mosaic of Saxony-Anhalt: The future of the housing market in demographic change). IFL, Leipzig.
  29. Garrod B., Wornell R., Youell R., 2006. Re-conceptualizing rural resources as countryside capital: The case of rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies 22: 117–128.
  30. Gebhardt H., Glaser R., Radtke U., Reuber P., 2007. Geographie, Physische Geographie und Humangeographie (Geography, physical geography and human geography). Spektrum, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  31. Gehrlein U., 2012. An der Randern der Metropole: Entwicklung, Funktion und Probleme periurbaner Raume in der Rhein-Main-Region (On the edge of the metropolis: Development, function and problems of peri-urban space in the Rhine-Main region). In: Monstadt J., Robischon T., Schoenig B., Zimmermann K. (eds), Die diskutierte Region, Probleme und Planungsansätze der Metropolregion Rhein-Main. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York: 155–174.
  32. Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Statistics Poland), 2017. Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach czasowej emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2016 (Information on the size and directions of temporary emigration from Poland in the years 2014–2016). Warszawa. Online: (accessed: 18 December 2017).
  33. Grochowski M., 2011. Metropolizacja a kształtowanie ładu przestrzennego układów zurbanizowanych (Metropo lisation and the formation of spatial order in urbanised systems). Mazowsze, Studia Regionalne 6: 167–172.
  34. Grochowski M., Korcelli P., Kozubek E., Sławiński T., Werner P., 2013. Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. In: Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C., Sick Nielsen T. (eds), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 131–167.
  35. Grzeszczak J., 1996. Tendencje kontrurbanizacyjne w krajach Europy Zachodniej (Counterurbanisation tendencies in the countries of Western Europe). Prace Geograficzne 167, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
  36. Halfacree K., 2006a. From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography 30(3): 309–336.
  37. Halfacree K., 2006b. Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds), Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage Publications, London: 44–62.
  38. Hoggart K., 1990. Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9: 245–257.
  39. Hoggart K., 2005a. City hinterlands in European space. In: Hoggart K. (ed.), The city's hinterland: Dinamism and divergence in Europe’s peri-urban territories. Ashgate, Aldershot: 1–18.
  40. Hoggart K., 2005b. Convergence and divergence in European city hinterlands: A cross-national comparison. In: Hoggart K. (ed.), The city's hinterland: Dynamism and civergence in Europe's peri-urban territories. Ashgate, Aldershot: 155–169.
  41. Hoggart K., 2016. City hinterlands in European space. In: Hoggart K. (ed.), The city’s hinterland: Dynamism and divergence in Europe’s peri-urban territories. Routledge, London and New York: 1–18.
  42. Hornis W., van Eck J.R., 2008. A typology of peri-urban areas in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economishe en Sociale Geografie 99(5): 619–628.
  43. Iaquinta D.L., Drescher A.W., 2000. Defining peri-urban: Understanding rural-urban linkages and their connection to institutional contexts. Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives 2000(2): 8–26.
  44. Idczak P., Mrozik K., 2016. Peryurbanizacja w poznańskim obszarze metropolitalnym (Peri-urbanisation in the Poznań metropolitan area). Studia i Prace WNEiZ US 46(2): 243–254.
  45. Ilbery B., 1998. The geography of rural change. Longman, Essex.
  46. Kaplan D.H., Wheeler J.O., Holloway S.R., 2004. Urban geography. Wiley&Sons Press, Hoboken.
  47. Korcelli P., Grochowski M., Kozubek E.B., Korcelli-Olejniczak E., Werner P., 2012. Development of urban-rural regions: From European to local perspective. IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
  48. Korcelli-Olejniczak E., 2012. Region metropolitalny – pojęcie, struktura przestrzenna, dynamika (Metropolitan area—notion, spatial structure, dynamics). Prace Geograficzne 235, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
  49. Korf B., Oughton E., 2006. Rethinking the European countryside – can we learn from the South? Journal of Rural Studies 22: 278–289.
  50. Krisjane Z., Apsite-Berina E., Berzins M., Grine I., 2017. Regional topicalities in Latvia: Mobility and immobility in the countryside. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development” No. 45 Jelgava, LLU ESAF, 27–28 April 2017, 127–133.
  51. Kröhnert S., Medicus F., Klingholz R., 2007. Die demographische Lage der Nation Wie zukunftsfähig sind Deutschlands Regionen? (The demographic situation of the nation. How sustainable are Germany‘s regions?) Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München.
  52. Kruzmetra Z., 2011. Changes in rural settlement patterns of peri-urban areas of Latvia. University of Latvia, Riga.
  53. Krzysztofik R., Dymitrow M., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Biegańska J., 2017. Poverty and social exclusion: An alternative spatial explanation. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 35: 45–64.
  54. Lisowski A., Grochowski M., 2009. Procesy suburbanizacji. Uwarunkowania, formy i konsekwencje (Suburbanisation processes. Determinants, forms and consequences). In: Ekspertyzy do Koncepcji Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Kraju. Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa: 217–280.
  55. Lowry I.S., 1990. World Urbanization in Perspective. Population and Development Review 16: 148–176.
  56. Mahon M., 2007. New population; shifting expectations: The changing experience of Irish rural space and place. Journal of Rural Studies 23: 345–356.
  57. Markowski T., Marszał T. (eds), 2006. Metropolie, obszary metropolitalne, metropolizacja. Problemy i pojęcia podstawowe (Metropolises, metropolitan areas, metropolisation. Basic problems and notions). KPZK, Warszawa.
  58. Mazur M., Bański J., Czapiewski K., Śleszyński P., 2015. Wiejskie obszary funkcjonalne – próba metodyczna wyznaczenia ich obszarów i granic (Rural functional areas – methodological attempt at determining their areas and boundaries). Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 37: 7–36.
  59. Mitchell C.J.A., 2004. Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies 20: 15–34.
  60. Mrozik K., Idczak P., 2015. Suburbanizacja w wybranych gminach wiejskich Bydgosko-Toruńskiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego (Suburbanisation in selected rural communes of the Bydgoszcz–Toruń Metropolitan Area). Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 42(2): 183–194.
  61. Nilsson K., Nielsen S., 2013. The future of the rural urban region. In: Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C., Sick Nielsen T. (eds), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg: 405–429.
  62. Parysek J.J., Mierzejewska L., 2005. Między dezurbanizacją a reurbanizacją: Nowe oblicze urbanizacji w Polsce (Between deurbanisation and reurbanisation: A new image of urbanisation in Poland). In: Jażdżewska I. (ed.), Współczesne procesy urbanizacji i ich skutki. Wyd. UŁ, Łódź: 47–56.
  63. Pauleit S., Sauerwein M., Breuste J., 2016. Urbanisierung und ihre Herausforderungen für die ökologische Stadtentwicklung (Urbanisation and its challenges for ecological urban development). In: Breuste J., Pauleit S., Haase D., Sauerwein M. (eds), Stadtökosysteme: Funktion, Management und Entwicklung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg: 1–30.
  64. Peri-urbanisation – a phenomenon the rise throughout Europe. NEWRUR research Project 2001–2004. Online: (accessed 8 December 2016).
  65. Perlik M., 1999. Urbanisationszonen in den Alpen. Ergebnis wachsender Pendeldistanzen (Urbanisation zones in the Alps. Result of increasing commuters‘ distances). Revue de géographie alpine 87(2): 147–165.
  66. Perlik M., 2001. Wirtschaftliche Strukturtypen als Indikator für die Verstärkung der internationalen Netzwerkeinbindung der Alpenstädte (Economic structure types as an indicator of the strengthening of the international network integration of Alpine towns). Revue de géographie alpine 89(1): 87–103.
  67. Rasnaca L., Kruzmetra Z., 2014. The population and labour market flows in the ex-socialist non-urban areas of Latvia. In: Babiakova B., Bandlerova A., Brown D., Kaleta A., Kulcsar L.J., Singelmann J. (eds), Social and economic transformations affecting rural people and communities in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra.
  68. Rasnaca L., Kruzmetra Z., 2014. The population and labour market flows in the ex-socialist non-urban areas of Latvia. In: Babiakova B., Bandlerova A., Brown D., Kaleta A., Kulcsar L.J., Singelmann J. (eds), Social and economic transformations affecting rural people and communities in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra.
  69. Ravetz J., Fertner C., Sick Nielsen T., 2013. The dynamics of peri-urbanization. In: Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C., Sick Nielsen T. (eds), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg: 13–44.
  70. Rogatka K., 2014. Dynamics and structure of building movement in Poland at the turn of 21st century. PhD thesis defended at the Faculty of Earth Sciences, Department of Urban Studies and Regional Development, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń.
  71. Rządowa Rada Ludnościowa, 2014. Sytuacja demograficzna Polski. Raport 2013–2014 (Demographic situation in Poland. Report 2013–2014). Warszawa. Online: (accessed: 18 December 2017).
  72. Sadura P., Murawska K., Włodarczyk Z., 2017. Wieś w Polsce 2017: diagnoza i prognoza (The countryside in Poland 2017: Diagnosis and forecast). Fundacja Wspomagania Wsi, Warszawa.
  73. Sieverts T., 1997. Zwischenstadt. Zwischen Ort und Welt, Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land (Between city. Between place and world, space and time, city and country). Vieweg, Braunschweig.
  74. Środa-Murawska S., 2013. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie poziomu rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego Niemiec (Spatial differentiation of Germany’s level of socio-economic development). Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy 31: 308–317.
  75. Swiaczny F., 2015. Auswirkungen des demografischen Wandels auf die regionale Bevölkerungsdynamik in Deutschland (Effects of demographic change on regional population dynamics in Germany). Raumforschung und Raumordnung 73(6): 407–421.
  76. Szymańska D., Biegańska J., 2011. Fenomen urbanizacji i procesy z nim związane (The phenomenon of urbanisation and related processes). Studia Miejskie 4: 13–38.
  77. Szymańska D., Biegańska J., 2012. Infrastructure’s and housing’s development in the rural areas in Poland – some problems. Journal of Infrastructure Development 4(1): 1–17.
  78. Szymańska D., Biegańska J., 2014. Charakterystyka obszarów wiejskich w Polsce w kontekście starzenia (The profile of rural areas in Poland in the context of ageing). Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 35: 89–108.
  79. Szymańska D., Środa-Murawska S., Biegańska J., 2008. Germany – two demographically different states? Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 10: 85–91.
  80. Szymańska, D., 2013. Geografia osadnictwa (Settlement geography). PWN, Warszawa.
  81. Territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion, 2006. Facets of regional diversity and potentials in Europe. ESPON Synthesis Report III, results by 28 November 2006, Bruxelles. Evidence from the ESPON 2006 Programme. Online: (accessed 10 December 2016).
  82. The Economic Profile of Riga 2017. The Riga City Council City Development Department. Online: (accessed: 20 November 2017).
  83. Tisdale H., 1942. The process of urbanization. Social Forces 20(3): 311–316.
  84. Węcławowicz G., Bański J., Degórski M., Komornicki T., Worcelli P., Śleszyński P., 2006. Przestrzenne zagospodarowanie Polski na początku XXI wieku (Spatial development of Poland at the beginning of the 21st century). IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa.
  85. Wehrhahn R., 2000. Zur Peripherie postmoderner Metropolen: Periurbanisierung, Fragmentierung und Polarisierung, dargestellt am Beispiel Madrid (To the periphery of postmodern metropolises: Periurbanisation, fragmentation and polarisation, illustrated by the example of Madrid). Erdkunde 54(3): 221–237.
  86. Wehrhahn R., 2016. Bevölkerung und Migration (Population and migration). In: Freytag T., Gebhardt H., Gebhardt U., Wastl-Walter D. (eds), Humangeographie kompakt. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg: 39–66.
  87. Wirth L., 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology 49(1): 1–24.
  88. Wołkonowski J., 2015. Trendy w emigracji siły roboczej krajów bałtyckich w latach 2003–2013 (Trends in the emigration of Baltic states’ workforce in the years 2003–2013). International Business and Global Economy 33: 140–153.
  89. Zimmermann C. (ed.), 2006. Zentralität und Raumgefüge der Großstädte im 20. Jahrhundert (Centrality and spatial structure of the cities in the 20th century). Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.