Main Article Content

Tigran Haas
Ryan Locke


Within the realm of contemporary urban design theory and practice, a number of authors have conceptualised the trends and processes of city development and planning into a series of urbanisms. This discussion essay examines the overall tenets of the ‘ReUrbanism paradigm’, a paradigm that has long been present in city planning and development but has received limited analysis and criticism and has not gained a more integrated position within the professional and academic worlds. This paper continues a paradigm development outline, leaning on the characteristics of other urbanisms in order to develop and provide a frame of reference and to contribute to the ongoing build-up of taxonomies about the trajectory of contemporary urban design thought. Focusing on the American representative case of Detroit, the authors of this paper argue for a better understanding of this urban regeneration paradigm, which they characterise as a rational urban planning & design approach in the contemporary age of inner city renewal.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite


  1. Barnett J., 2011. City design: Modernist, traditional, green and systems perspectives. Routledge, London.
  2. Bitter C., Krause A., 2012. Re-urbanism or bigger ‘burbs’?: The implications of demographic change for housing markets. Runstad Center for Real Estate Studies, Department of Urban Design and Planning (working draft research paper), University of Washington.
  3. Carmona M., Heath T., Oc T., Tiesdell S., 2010. Public places, urban spaces. Elsevier/Architectural Press. Boston, MA.
  4. Chase J., Crawford M., Kaliski J., 2008. Everyday urbanism expanded. Monacelli Press, New York.
  5. Childs M., 2006. Squares: A public place design guide for urbanists. The University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
  6. Cision, 2017. The District Detroit announces Detroit’s largest residential development initiative in more than 20 years. PR Newswire, 26 May 2017. Online: (accessed: 22 July 2018).
  7. Cowan R., Campbell K., 2002 Re:urbanism – A challenge to the urban summit. Exchange, London.
  8. Cowley S., 2015. How Wayne state police helped breathe life into a blighted Detroit strip. The New York Times, 25 February 2015. Online: (accessed: 25 July 2018).
  9. Cuthbert A., 2006. The form of cities. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  10. Detroit Free Press, 2018. Is new 20-story residential high-rise coming to Comerica Park? Crain’s says yes. Detroit Free Press, 30 January 2018. Online: (accessed: 22 July 2018).
  11. Detroit News, 2017. Little Caesars Arena’s funding mix not without critics. Detroit News. Online: (accessed: 10 June 2017).
  12. Detroit Works, 2012. Detroit future city: Detroit strategic framework plan. Inland Press, Detroit.
  13. Dongsei K., 2014. Learning from adjectival urbanisms: The pluralistic. In: Stuart J., Wilson M. (eds), 102nd ACSA annual meeting proceedings. Globalizing architecture/Flows and disruptions.
  14. Fainstein S., 2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review 35(4).
  15. Fainstein S., 2009. Planning and the just city. In: Marcuse P., Connolly J., Novy J., Olivo I., Potter C., Steil J. (eds), Searching for the just city: Debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge, London: 144–58.
  16. Fainstein S., 2010. The just city. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
  17. Fainstein S., 2018. Lecture: The just city (lecture notes). The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (delivered 23 May 2018).
  18. Fraker H., 2007. Where is the urban design discourse? (rally discussion). Places (Design Observer) 19(3). College of Environmental Design, UC Berkeley.
  19. Gehl J., 2010. Cities for people. Island Press, Washington DC.
  20. Giometti C., 2006 Integrating urbanisms: Growing places between new urbanism and post-urbanism. In Cheng R., Tripeny P. (eds), Getting real: Design ethos now. 94th Annual meeting of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. Salt Lake City, Utah: 269–275.
  21. Haas T., Olsson K., 2014. Transmutation and reinvention of public spaces through ideals of urban planning and design. Space and Culture 17(1): 59–68.
  22. Hackworth J., 2016. Demolition as urban policy in the American Rust Belt. Environment and planning A: Economy and Space 48(11): 2201–2222.
  23. Harvey D., 2001. The new urbanism and the communitarian trap (on social problems and the false hope of design). Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring 1997, No. 1. President and Fellows of Harvard College and The MIT Press: 1–3.
  24. Kelbaugh D., 2007. Toward an integrated paradigm: Further thoughts on the three urbanisms. Places (Design Observer) 19(2). College of Environmental Design, UC Berke¬ley.
  25. Kiger J., 2018. Developers Ilitch and Gilbert describe their roles in Detroit’s revival (WWW document) Urban Land Magazine. Online: (accessed: 3 May 2018).
  26. Koolhaas R., 1994. What ever happened to urbanism? In: Jenks C., Kropf K. (eds), Theories and manifestos of contemporary architecture. Academy editions, 1997. Chichester, West Sussex.
  27. Koolhaas R., 2007. In search of authenticity. In Burdett R., Deyan S. (eds), The endless city. Phaidon, London: 320–323.
  28. Kotkin J., 2007. Opportunity urbanism: An emerging paradigm for the 21st century (research report by Joel Kotkin), Joel Kotkin and the Greater Houston Partnership, Houston.
  29. Krieger A., 2006. Territories of urban design. In: Rowland J., Moor M. (eds), Urban design futures, Routledge, London: 18–29.
  30. Krieger A., 2009. Being urban minded: Three current debates around urban design practice. Planetizen: Urban Planning, Design and Development. Online: (accessed: 4 April 2017).
  31. Larson E., 2017. Downtown Detroit partnership. (PowerPoint presentation). ICSC, Michigan Continuing Education Program. Online: (accessed: 7 June 2018).
  32. Mahy M., Alexander C., Neis H., Anninou A., King I., 1987. A new theory of urban design. Oxford University Press, New York.
  33. Neill W.J., 2015. Carry on shrinking?: The bankruptcy of urban policy in Detroit. Planning Practice and Research 30(1): 1–14.
  34. Oldenburg R., 1989. The great good place. Paragon House, New York.
  35. Peck J., 2013. Pushing austerity: State failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society: 24–28.
  36. Peck J., 2016. Economic rationality meets celebrity urbanology: Exploring Edward Glaeser’s city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(1): 1–30.
  37. Peterson S., Littenberg B., 2005. On ReUrbanism. In: Strick¬land R. (ed.), Post urbanism and ReUrbanism. Arts Press, New York (Michigan Debates on urbanism book III, The Regents of the University of Michigan, Series Editor: Douglas Kelbaugh).
  38. Ryan B., 2017. The largest art: A measured manifesto for a plural urbanism. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  39. Schwarzer M., 2000. The contemporary city in four movements. Journal of Urban Design 5(2): 127–144.
  40. Shea B., 2014. Detroit Rink City: Illitches’ grand plan to supersize the entertainment district. Crain’s Detroit Business Journal, 20 July 2014. Online: (accessed: 2 July 2018).
  41. Shea B., 2014b. On cost, financing of Wings arena: Here are answers. Crain’s Detroit Business Journal, 21 September 2014. Online: (accessed: 7 December 2018).
  42. Shea B., 2017. How Olympia financed an arena in a bankrupt city. Crain’s Detroit Business Journal, 10 September 2017. Online: (accessed: 2 July 2018).
  43. Talen E., 2005. New urbanism & American planning: The conflict of cultures. Routledge, New York.
  44. The District Detroit, 2018. Online: (accessed: 20 July 2018).
  45. Wiechmann T., Pallagst K.M., 2012. Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A comparison of transformation patterns and local strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(2): 261–280.