Main Article Content

Michał Adam Kwiatkowski


Environmental pollution in cities is an increasingly popular issue tackled in research. One of the elements with a significant impact on the state of urban ecosystems is transport with its pressure on individual components of the environment. Sustainable urban transport is gaining prominence as a postulate expressed in cities’ strategic documents, constituting an element alleviating the negative effects of anthropopressure. In the light of the need to introduce innovative solutions for clean forms of transport, numerous papers indicate the bicycle as an answer to some of those problems. The article presents a review of literature referring to the socio-economic aspects of using the bicycle in cities as a means of transport for daily commuting. The analysis is based on publications on cyclist safety in road traffic, the perception of the bicycle as a means of transport in cities, and the introduction of innovative solutions, such as bicycle-sharing systems.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kwiatkowski, M. A. (2018). URBAN CYCLING AS AN INDICATOR OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(4), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0039


  1. Aichinger W., Reinbacher E., 2010. Cycling policy and practice in mega-cities Rio de Janeiro and Cairo: A case study. Proceedings SB10 Amman: Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development (held on 12–14 July 2010 in Amman, Jordan) II: 361–376.
  2. Aldred R., Jungnickel K., 2014. Why culture matters for transport policy: The case of cycling in the UK. Journal of Transport Geography 34: 78–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.004
  3. Apasnore P., Ismail K., Kassim A., 2017. Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention 106: 141–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.003
  4. Bambach M.R., Mitchell R.J., Grzebieta R.H., Olivier J., 2013. The effectiveness of helmets in bicycle collisions with motor vehicles: A case-control study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 53: 78–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.005
  5. Bao J., He T., Ruan S., Li Y., Zheng Y., 2017. Planning bike lanes based on sharing-bikes’ trajectories. KDD ’17 Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 1377–1386. DOI: 10.1145/3097983.3098056
  6. Bharadwaj S., Ballare S., Rohit, Chandel M.K., 2017. Impact of congestion on greenhouse gas emissions for road transport in Mumbai metropolitan region. Transportation Research Procedia 25: 3538–3551. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.282
  7. Bíl M., Bílová M., Müller I., 2010. Critical factors in fatal collisions of adult cyclists with automobiles. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42(6): 1632–1636. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.001
  8. Boufous S., Hatfield J., Grzebieta R., 2018. The impact of environmental factors on cycling speed on shared paths. Accident Analysis & Prevention 110: 171–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.017
  9. Buehler R., Pucher J., 2012. Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation 39(2): 40 – 432. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-011-9355-8
  10. Bulhões T., Subramanian A., Erdoǧan G., Laporte G., 2018. The static bike relocation problem with multiple vehicles and visits. European Journal of Operational Research 264(2): 508–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.028
  11. Bullock C., Brereton F., Bailey S., 2017. The economic contribution of public bike-share to the sustainability and efficient functioning of cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 28: 76–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.024
  12. Caggiani L., Camporeale R., Marinelli M., Ottomanelli M., 2018. User satisfaction based model for resource allocation in bike-sharing systems. Transport Policy (in press, corrected proof). DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.003
  13. Chen P., Shen Q., 2016. Built environment effects on cyclist injury severity in automobile-involved bicycle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention 86: 239–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.002
  14. Cohen B., Kietzmann J., 2014. Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment 27(3): 279–296. DOI: 10.1177/1086026614546199
  15. Cole-Hunter T., Donaire-Gonzalez D., Curto A., Ambros A., Valentin A., Garcia-Aymerich J., Martinez D., Braun L.M., Mendez M., Jerrett M., Rodriguez D., de Nazelle A., Nieuwenhuijsen M., 2015. Objective correlates and determinants of bicycle commuting propensity in an urban environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 40: 132–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.004
  16. De Chardon C.M., Caruso G., Thomas I., 2017. Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 100: 202–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.020
  17. DeMaio P., 2009. Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation 12(4): 41–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3
  18. Dill J., 2009. Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy 30(1): Connecting active living research to policy solutions: S95-S110. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40207254 (accessed: 8 April 2018)
  19. Duarte F., Procopiuck M., Fujioka K., 2014. ‘No bicycle lanes!’ Shouted the cyclists. A controversial bicycle project in Curitiba, Brazil. Transport Policy 32: 180–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.010
  20. Fishman E., Schepers P., 2016. Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety. Journal of Safety Research 56: 41–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.007
  21. Fishman E., Washington S., Haworth N.L., 2013. Bike share: A synthesis of literature. Transport Reviews 33(2): 148–165. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.775612
  22. Fricker C., Gast N., 2016. Incentives and redistribution in homogeneous bike-sharing systems with stations of finite capacity. Euro Journal on Transportation and Logistics 5(3): 261–291.
  23. Frondel M., Vance C., 2017. Cycling on the extensive and intensive margin: The role of paths and prices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: 21–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.018
  24. Gatersleben B., Appleton K.M., 2007. Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41(4): 302–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.002
  25. Gonzalo-Orden H., Linares A., Velasco L., Diez J.M., Rojo M., 2014. Bikeways and cycling urban mobility. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 160: 567–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.170
  26. Gössling S., Choi A.S., 2015. Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles. Ecological Economics 113: 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.006
  27. Haider Z., Nikolaev A., Kang J.E., Kwon C., 2018. Inventory rebalancing through pricing in public bike sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research (in press, accepted manuscript). DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.053
  28. Hatfield J., Boufous S., 2016. The effect of non-recreational transport cycling use of other transport modes: A cross-sectional on-line survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 92: 220–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.011
  29. Hamilton T., Wichman C.J., 2018. Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: Evidence from DC’s Capital Bikeshare’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 87: 72–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.03.007
  30. Heesch K.C., Giles-Corti B., Turrell G., 2015. Cycling for transport and recreation: Associations with the socio-economic, natural and built environment. Health & Place 36: 152–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.004
  31. Jennings G., 2015: Finding our balance: Considering the opportunities for public bicycle systems in Cape Town, South Africa. Research in Transportation Business & Management 15: 6–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.09.001
  32. Kaspi M., Raviv T., Tzur M., 2014. Parking reservation policies in one-way vehicle sharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 62: 35–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.01.006
  33. Kaspi M., Raviv T., Tzur M., Galili H., 2016. Regulating vehicle sharing systems through parking reservation policies: Analysis and performance bounds. European Journal of Operational Research 251(3): 969–987. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.015
  34. Kondo M.C., Morrison C., Guerra E., Kaufman E.J., Wiebe D.J., 2018. Where do bike lanes work best? A Bayesian spatial model of bicycle lanes and bicycle crashes. Safety Science 103: 225–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.002
  35. Kim J.K., Kim S., Ulfarsson G.F., Portello L.A., 2007. Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-motor vehicle accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(2): 238–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.002
  36. Kim K., 2018. Investigation on the effects of weather and calendar events on bike-sharing according to the trip patterns of bike rentals of stations. Journal of Transport Geography 66: 309–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.001
  37. Kraemer J.D., 2016. Helmet laws, helmet use, and bicycle ridership. Journal of Adolescent Health 59(3): 338–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.009
  38. Levy N., Golani C., Ben-Elia E., 2017. An explanatory study of spatial patterns of cycling in Tel Aviv using passively generated bike-sharing data. Journal of Transport Geography (in press, corrected proof). DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.005
  39. Lopez D., Glickman M.E., Soumerai S.B., Hemenway D., 2017. Identifying factors related to a hit-and-run after a vehicle-bicycle collision. Journal of Transport & Health (in press, corrected proof). DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.005
  40. Lusk A.C., Anastasio A., Shaffer N., Wu J., Li Y., 2017. Biking practices and preferences in a lower income, primarily minority neighborhood: Learning what residents want. Preventive Medicine Reports 7: 232–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.01.006
  41. Martens K., 2007. Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A 41: 326–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.010
  42. McBain C., Caulfield B., 2017. An analysis of the factors influencing journey time variation in the Cork Public Bike System. Sustainable Cities and Society (in press, corrected proof). DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.030
  43. Midgley P., 2009. The role of smart bike-sharing systems in urban mobility. Journeys 2(2): 23–31.
  44. Midgley P., 2011. Bicycle-sharing schemes: Enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas. Commission On Sustainable Development, Nineteenth Session New York, 2–13 May 2011. Background Paper No. 8. CSD19/2011/BP8.
  45. Methorst R., Schepers P., Kamminga J., Zeegers T., Fishman E., 2017. Can cycling safety be improved by opening all unidirectional cycle paths for cycle traffic in both directions? A theoretical examination of available literature and data. Accident Analysis and Prevention 105: 38–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.018
  46. Nakamura H., Abe N., 2014. The role of a non-profit organisation-run public bicycle-sharing programme: The case of Kitakyushu City, Japan. Journal of Transport Geography 41: 338–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.009
  47. Nilsson P., Stigson H., Ohlin M., Standorth J., 2017. Modelling the effect on injuries and fatalities when changing mode of transport form from car to bicycle. Accident Analysis & Prevention 100: 30–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.020
  48. Oja P., Vuori I., Paronen O., 1998. Daily walking and cycling to work: Their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Education and Counseling 33(1): S87–S94. DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00013-5
  49. Parker K.M., Rice J., Gustat J., Ruley J., Spriggs A., Johnson C., 2013. Effect of bike lane infrastructure improvements on ridership in one New Orleans neighborhood. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 45(1): 101–107. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-012-9440-z
  50. Parkes S.D., Marsden G., Shaheen S.A., Cohen A.P., 2013. Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: Evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography 31: 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.003
  51. Piatkowski D.P., Marshall W.E., 2015. Not all prospective bicyclists are created equal: The role of attitudes, socio-demographics, and the built environment in bicycle commuting. Travel Behavior and Society 2(3): 166–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2015.02.001
  52. Pokorny P., Pritchard R., Pitera K., 2018. Conflicts between bikes and trucks in urban areas – A survey of Norwegian cyclists. Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(1): 147–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2017.11.010
  53. Pokorny P., Drescher J., Pitera K., Jonsson T., 2017. Accidents between freight vehicles and bicycles, with a focus on urban areas. Transportation Research Procedia 25: 999–1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.474
  54. Popa I., Ferraro O.E., Orsi C., Morandi A., Montomoli C., 2017. Bicycle helmet use patterns in Italy. A description and analysis of survey data from an Italian friends of cycling association. Accident Analysis & Prevention 108: 268–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.003
  55. Porter A.K., Salvo D., Kohl Iii H.W., 2016. Correlates of helmet use among recreation and transportation bicyclists. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 51(6): 999–1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.033
  56. Pucher J., Dill J., Handy S., 2010. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50(suppl.): 106–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028
  57. Pulugurtha S.S., Thakur V., 2015. Evaluating the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane and assessing risk to bicyclists in Charlotte, North Carolina. Accident Analysis & Prevention 76: 34–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.020
  58. Ricci M., 2015. Bike sharing: A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation. Research in Transportation Business & Management 15: 28–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.003
  59. Rodrigue J.P., Comtois C., Slack B., 2013. The geography of transport systems (third edition). Routledge.
  60. Rossetti T., Guevara C.A., Galilea P., Hurtubia R., 2018. Modeling safety as a perceptual latent variable to assess cycling infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 111: 252–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.019
  61. Saberi M., Ghamami M., Gu Y., Shojaei M.H., Fishman E., 2018. Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns: A case of tube strike in London. Journal of Transport Geography 66: 154–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.018
  62. Sallis J.F., Conway T.L., Dillon L.I., Frank L.D., Adams M.A., Cain K.L., Saelens B.E., 2013. Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. Preventive Medicine 57(5): 456–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.014
  63. Schepers P., Fishman E., Beelen R., Heinen E., Wijnen W., Parkin J., 2015. The mortality impact of bicycle paths and lanes related to physical activity, air pollution exposure and road safety. Journal of Transport & Health 2(4): 460–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.09.004
  64. Schepers P., Twisk D., Fishman E., Fyhri A., Jensen A., 2017. The Dutch road to a high level of cycling safety. Safety Science 92: 264–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.005
  65. Schoner J.E., Harrison A., Wang X., 2012. Sharing to grow: Economic activity associated with nice ride bike share stations. Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.
  66. Schuijbroek J., Hampshire R.C., van Hoeve W.-J., 2017. Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems. European Journal Of Operational Research 257(3): 992–1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.029
  67. Shaheen S., Guzman S., Zhang H., 2010. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record 2143: 159–167.
  68. Silvano A.P., Koutsopoulos H.N., Ma X., 2016. Analysis of vehicle-bicycle interactions at unsignalized crossings. A probabilistic approach and application. Accident Analysis & Prevention 97: 38–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.016
  69. Spinney J., 2010. Mobilising sustainability: Partnership working between a pro-cycling NGO and local government in London (UK). In: Peters M., Fudge S., Jackson T. (eds), Low carbon communities imaginative approaches to combating climate change locally. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham: 89–107.
  70. Stephenson J., Spector S., Hopkins D., McCarthy A., 2018. Deep interventions for a sustainable transport future. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 61(B): 356–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.031
  71. Stipancic J., Zangenehpour S., Miranda-Moreno L., Saunier N., Granie M.A., 2016. Investigating the gender differences on bicycle-vehicle conflicts at urban intersections using an ordered logit methodology. Accident Analysis & Prevention 97: 19–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.033
  72. van der Horst A.R.A., de Goede M., de Hair-Buijssen S., Methorst R., 2014. Traffic conflicts on bicycle paths: A systematic observation of behaviour from video. Accident Analysis & Prevention 62: 358–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.005
  73. Van Holle V., Van Cauwenberg J., Deforche B., Goubert L., Maes L., Nasar J., Van de Weghe N., Salmon J., De Bourdeaudhuij I., 2014. Environmental invitingness for transport-related cycling in middle-aged adults: A proof of concept study using photographs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 69: 432–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.009
  74. Vansteenkiste P., Zeuwts L., Cardon G., Philippaerts R., Lenoir M., 2014. The implications of low quality bicycle paths on gaze behavior of cyclists: A field test. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 23: 81–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.019
  75. Vansteenkiste P., Zeuwts L., van Maarseveen M., Cardon G., Savelsbergh G., Lenoir M., 2017. The implications of low quality bicycle paths on the gaze behavior of young learner cyclists. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 48: 52–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.013
  76. Wang M., Zhou X., 2017. Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Transport Geography 65: 147–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.022
  77. Wardman M., Tight M., Page M., 2007. Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41(4): 339–350. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.011
  78. Xu C., Yang Y., Jin S., Qu Z., Hou L., 2016. Potential risk and its influencing factors for separated bicycle paths. Accident Analysis & Prevention 87: 59–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.014
  79. Yang X., Cheng Z., Chen G., Wang L., Ruan Z., Zheng Y., 2018. The impact of a public bicycle-sharing system on urban public transport networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 107: 246–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.017
  80. Zanotto M., Winters M.L., 2017. Helmet use among person¬al bicycle riders and bike share users in Vancouver, BC. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 53(4): 465–472. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.013
  81. Zavareh M.F., Hezaveh A.M., Nordfjaern T., 2018. Intention to use bicycle helmet as explained by the health belief model, comparative optimism and risk perception in an Iranian sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 54: 248–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.003
  82. Zawieska J., Pieriegud J., 2018. Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonization. Transport Policy 63: 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.11.004
  83. Zhang L., Zhang J., Duan Z., Bryde D., 2015. Sustainable bike-sharing systems: Characteristics and commonalities across cases in urban China. Journal of Cleaner Production 97: 124–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.006
  84. Zhao J., Wang J., Xing Z., Luan X., Jiang Y., 2018. Weather and cycling: Mining big data to have an in-depth understanding of the association of weather variability with cycling on an off-road trail and an on-road bike lane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 111: 119–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.001