FRANZISCEAN CADASTRE IN LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE RESEARCH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Main Article Content

Martin Dolejš
Michal Forejt

Abstract

Historical and archival sources are of cardinal importance in landscape research addressing the processes and course of landscape changes in European regions. The Franziscean cadastre from the 19th century is among the most widely used historical sources in Central Europe. We identified 1440 records, finally providing 104 articles reporting the use of the Franziscean cadastre for in-depth analyses in order to identify (i) the practice of the cadastral data processing, (ii) purpose and spatial extent of the study, (iii) use of complementary sources and (iv) particular land use/land cover classes under study. We have found the increasing attention towards the Franziscean cadastre as a source for landscape research reflected by the doubling number of records in the past decade with majority of the case studies located in Czechia (79), followed by Austria (9) and Italy (3). We have identified the trends in the use in landscape trajectory research and application to hydrology, agriculture and forestry. As regards the data processing, several  issues connected with the methodology or design of the records were found (e.g. geographic information system processing description and data source specification). We further problematize the suitability of the supplementary data used and conclude our review with a set of recommendations to contribute to the discussion on the methodology of landscape reconstruction with historical datasets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dolejš, M., & Forejt, M. (2019). FRANZISCEAN CADASTRE IN LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE RESEARCH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Quaestiones Geographicae, 38(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0013
Section
Articles

References

  1. Affek A., 2015. Spatially explicit changes in land ownership through 3 socio-political systems: A case study from southeast Poland. Geographia Polonica 88(3): 519–530. DOI 10.7163/GPol.0032.
  2. Agnoletti M., 2007. The degradation of traditional landscape in a mountain area of Tuscany during the 19th and 20th centuries: Implications for biodiversity and sustainable management. Forest Ecology and Management 249: 5–17. DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.032.
  3. Apan A.A., Peterson J.A., 1998. Probing Tropical Deforestation. Applied Geography 18(2): 137–52.
  4. Bender O., Boehmer H.J., Jens D., Schumacher K.P., 2005. Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 111–125. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.008.
  5. Beranová L., Balej M., Raška P., 2017. Assessing the geotourism potential of abandoned quarries with multitemporal data (České Středohoří Mts., Czechia). GeoScape 11(2): 93–111. DOI 10.1515/geosc-2017-0008.
  6. Bičík I., Anděl J., Balej M., 2010. Landscape Function Transformations with Relation to Land-Use Changes. In: J. Anděl, I. Bičík, P. Dostál, Z. Lipský, S.G. Shahneshin (eds.), Landscape Modelling. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht: 87–103. DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3052-8_7.
  7. Bíl M., Krejčí O., Bílová M., Kubeček J., Sedoník J., Krejčí V., 2014. A chronology of landsliding and its Impacts on the Village of Halenkovice, Outer Western Carpathians. Geografie 4: 342–363.
  8. Biszak E., Biszak S., Timár G., Nagy D., Molnár G., 2017. Historical topographic and cadastral maps of Europe in spotlight – Evolution of the MAPIRE map portal. Proc. 12th ICA Conf. Digit. Approaches to Cartogr. Heritage, Venice, 26–28 April 2017: 204–208.
  9. Breschi M., Fornasin A., Manfredini M., Pozzi L., Rettaroli R., Scalone F., 2014. Social and Economic Determinants of Reproductive Behavior Before the Fertility Decline. The Case of Six Italian Communities During the Nineteenth Century. European Journal of Population 30: 291–315. DOI 10.1007/s10680-013-9303-8.
  10. Brook B.W., Bowman D.M.J.S., 2006. Postcards from the past: charting the landscape-scale conversion of tropical Australian savanna to closed forest during the 20th century. Landscape Ecology 21: 1253–1266. DOI 10.1007/s10980- 006-0018-7/
  11. Bumba J., 2007. České katastry od 11. do 21. století. Grada.
  12. Dale P., Mclaughlin J. D., 2000. Land Administration. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  13. Dolák L., Brázdil R., Valášek H., 2015. Impacts of Hydrometeorological Extremes in the Bohemian-Moravian Highlands in 1706 – 1889 As Derived From Taxation Records. Geografie 120: 465–488.
  14. Ebel M., 2004. Stabilní katastr a jeho využití pro dějiny staveb. Dějiny staveb 1: 5–14.
  15. Fescenko A., Lukins M., Fescenko I., 2016. Validation of medium-scale historical maps of Southern Latvia for evaluation of impact of continuous forest cover on the present-day mean stand area and tree species richness. Baltic Forestry 22(1): 51–62.
  16. Feucht R., 2008. Flächenangaben im österreichischen Kataster. Diploma Thesis. Technischen Universität Wien.
  17. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe M.T., Daily G.C., Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K., 2005. Global Consequences of Land Use. Science 5734(309): 570–574.
  18. Forejt M., Dolejš M., Raška P., 2018. How reliable is my historical land-use reconstruction? Assessing uncertainties in old cadastral maps. Ecological Indicators 94: 237–245. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.053.
  19. Forejt M., Skalos J., Pereponova A., Plieninger T., Vojta J., Šantrůčková M., 2017. Changes and continuity of wood-pastures in the lowland landscape in Czechia. Applied Geography 79: 235–244. DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.016.
  20. Fraňková E., Cattaneo C., 2018. Organic farming in the past and today: sociometabolic perspective on a Central European case study. Regional Environmental Change 18(4): 951–963. DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1099-8.
  21. Fuchs R., Verburg P. H., Clevers J. G. P. W., Herold M., 2015. The potential of old maps and encyclopaedias for reconstructing historic European land cover/use change. Applied Geography 59: 43–55. DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.013.
  22. Glavan M., Miličić V., Pintar M., 2013. Finding options to improve catchment water quality—Lessons learned from historical land use situations in a Mediterranean catchment in Slovenia. Ecological Modelling 261–262: 58–73. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.004.
  23. Hahsler M., Grün B., Hornik K., 2005. arules – A Computational Environment for Mining Association Rules and Frequent Item Sets. Journal of Statistical Software 14(15): 1–25. DOI 10.18637/jss.v014.i15.
  24. Hamre L. N., Domaas S. T., Austad I., Rydgren K., 2007. Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landscape Ecology 22(10): 1563–1574. DOI 10.1007/s10980-007-9154-y.
  25. Harvey F., Kaim D., Gajda A., 2014. Analysis of historical change using cadastral materials in the carpathian foothills. European Journal of Geography 5(3): 6–21.
  26. Hohensinner S., Lager B., Sonnlechner C., Haidvogl G., Gierlinger S., Schmid M., Krausmann F., Winiwarter V., 2013. Changes in water and land: the reconstructed Viennese riverscape from 1500 to the present. Water History 5(2): 145–172. DOI 10.1007/s12685-013-0074-2.
  27. Kaim D., Kozak J., Ostafin K., Dobosz M., Ostapowicz K., Kolecka N., Gimmi U., 2014. Uncertainty in Historical Land-Use Reconstructions with Topographic Maps. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(3): 55–63. DOI 10.2478/quageo-2014-0029.
  28. Kain R. J. P., Baigent E., 1992. The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State: A History of Property Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  29. Karásek P., Tlapáková L., Podhrázská J., 2015. The Location and Extent of Systematic Drainage in Relation to Land Use in the Past and at Present and in Relation to Soil Vulnerability to Accelerater Infiltration in the Protected Landscape Area Železné Hory. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63(4): 1121–1131.
  30. Kienast F., 1993. Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System? a methodological outline. Landscape Ecology 8(2): 103–118. DOI 10.1007/ BF00141590.
  31. Kolejka J., 2010. Post-industrial landscape – its identification and classification as contemporary challenges faced by geographic research. Geographia Technica 12(2): 67–78.
  32. Krausmann F., 2008. Land Use and Socio-economic Metabolism in Pre-industrial Agricultural Systems: Four Nineteenth-century Austrian Villages in Comparison. Social Ecology Working Paper 72 (December).
  33. Krčmářová J., 2015. Forgetting traditional agricultural knowledge in modernization. Interdisciplinry historical reconstruction of Czech agroforestry. PhD thesis, FHSUK, Praha.
  34. Krčmářová J., Arnold M., 2016. Traditional Agriculture as Cultural Heritage. Forgotten Agroforestry Practices Recorded in Textual Part of Nineteenth Century Tax Records. In: M. Agnoletti, F. Emanueli (eds.), Biocultural Diversity in Europe. Environmental History, Springer, vol. 5: 211–231. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26315-1_11.
  35. Krčmářová J., Jeleček L., 2017. Czech traditional agroforestry: historic accounts and current status. Agroforestry Systems 91(6): 1087–1100. DOI 10.1007/s10457-016-9985-0.
  36. Kugler R., Schönweiler F., 2014. Digitalization of the Franciscan Cadastral Survey (1817–1861). Working paper No. 17/16. United Nations Working Group on Geographical Names.
  37. LeGoff J., 2015. Must We Divide History into Periods? (English translation). Columbia University Press, New York.
  38. Leyk S., Boesch R., Weibel R., 2005. A conceptual framework for uncertainty investigation in map based land cover change modelling. Transactions in GIS 9(3): 291–322. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00220.x.
  39. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 6(7): e1000097. DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  40. ÖNB [Österreichische Nationalbibliothek], 2018. Grundsteuerpatent 1817. Politische Gesetze und Verordnungen Franz I 1792–1848. Online: alex.onb.ac.at/ [accessed 16 May 2018].
  41. Osborn J., 2013. Gesher Galicia’s Online Cadastral Map Room: Evolution and Opportunities. ENArC/ICARUS Workshop: Cartography and Cadastral Maps, Scuola Normale Superiore. Pisa.
  42. Pacina J., Holá M., 2014. Settlement identification in abandoned borderland. 14th SGEM GeoConference on Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing 1: 769–776. DOI 10.5593/SGEM2014/B21/S8.099.
  43. Pavelková R., Frajer J., Havlíček M., Netopil P., Rozkošný M., David V., Dzuráková M., Šarapatka B., 2016. Historical ponds of the Czech Republic: an example of the interpretation of historic maps. Journal of Maps 12: 551–559. DOI 10.1080/17445647.2016.1203830.
  44. Popelka S., Dedkova P., 2014. Extinct Village 3D visualization and its Evaluation with Eye-Movement Recording. In: B. Murgante, S. Misra, A.M.A.C. Rocha, C. Torre, J.G. Rocha, M.I. Falcão, D. Taniar, B.O. Apduhan, O. Gervasi (eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham, vol 8579: 786–795. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09144-0_54.
  45. Quaranta L., 2011. Agency of Change: Fertility and Seasonal Migration in a Nineteenth Century Alpine Community. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 27(4): 457–485. DOI 10.1007/s10680-011-9241-2.
  46. R Core Team, 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  47. Raška P., Dolejš M., Hofmanová M., 2017. Effects of Damming on Long-Term Development of Fluvial Islands, Elbe River (N Czechia). River Research and Applications 33(4): 471–482. DOI 10.1002/rra.3104.
  48. Raška P., Zábranský V., Brázdil R., Lamková J., 2016. The late Little Ice Age landslide calamity in North Bohemia: Triggers, impacts and post-landslide development reconstructed from documentary data (case study of the Kozí vrch Hill landslide). Geomorphology 255: 95–107. DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.009.
  49. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin F. S. I., Lambin E., Lenton T. M., et al., 2009. Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): art32. DOI 10.5751/ES-03180- 140232
  50. Scorpio V., Zen S., Bertoldi W., Surian N., Mastronunzio M., Dai Prá E., Zolezz, G., Comiti F., 2018. Channelization of a large Alpine river: what is left of its original morphodynamics? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 43(5): 1044–1062. DOI 10.1002/esp.4303.
  51. Skaloš J., Kašparová I., 2012. Landscape memory and landscape change in relation to mining. Ecological Engineering 43: 60–69. DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.07.001.
  52. Skaloš J., Keken Z., Justová H., Křováková K., Chaurová H., 2014. Classification System for Monitoring Historic Changes in Forest and Non-Forest Woody Vegetation—A Basis for Management. Open Journal of Forestry 4(1): 75–84. DOI 10.4236/ojf.2014.41012.
  53. Sklenička P., Charvátová E., 2003. Stand continuity—a useful parameter for ecological networks in post-mining landscapes. Ecological Engineering 20(4): 287–296. DOI 10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00053-3.
  54. Sklenička P., Zouhar J., Trpáková I., Vlasák J., 2017. Trends in land ownership fragmentation during the last 230 years in Czechia, and a projection of future developments. Land Use Policy 67: 640–651. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.030.
  55. Strzelecki K. 2013. 18th Century Vistula River Geography in View of Franciszek Florian Czaki’s Maps. Quaestiones Geographicae 32(1): 27–32. DOI 10.2478/quageo-2013-0004.
  56. Svobodová K., Hájek T., 2017. Pilgrimage route recovery in an industrial landscape. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60(6): 959–976. DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1189818.
  57. Szabó P., Hédl R., 2013. Socio-Economic Demands , Ecological Conditions and the Power of Tradition: Past Woodland Management Decisions in a Central European Landscape. Landscape Research 38(2): 243–261.
  58. Szturc J., Karásek P., Podhrázská J., 2017. Historical Changes in the Land Use Connected with Appropriation of Agricultural Land – Case Study of Cadastral Areas Dolní Věstonice and Modřice (Czech Republic). European Countryside 9(4): 658–678. DOI 10.1515/euco-2017-0038.
  59. Timár G., Biszak S., 2010. Digitizing and georeferencing of the historical cadastral maps (1856-60) of Hungary. 5th International Workshop on Digital Approaches in Cartographic Heritage. Vienna, Austria, 22–24 February 2010. 22–24.
  60. Tlapáková L., Karásek P., Stejskalová D., 2013. Retrospective Evaluation of the Extent and Spatial Changes of Realized Hydromelioration Systems. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 22(6): 1855–1862.
  61. Treml V., Migoń P., 2015. Controlling factors limiting timberline position and shifts in the Sudetes: A review. Geographia Polonica 88(2): 55–70. DOI 10.7163/GPol.0015.
  62. Troll M., Ostafin K., 2016. Use of late 18th and early 19th century cadastral data to estimate past forest cover change – a case study of Zawoja village. Prace Geograficzne 146: 31–49. DOI 10.4467/20833113PG.16.016.5546.
  63. Trpáková I., Trpák P., 2009. Úskalí analýzy a ekologické interpretace starých mapových děl na modelovém příkladu mapových a písemných částí stabilního katastru. Geo/ bio diverzita – integrující perspektivy. In: Romportl, D. Chuman, T. (eds.): Sborník abstraktů z výroční konference CZ – IALE, Univerzita Karlova, Praha. ÚAZK [Ústřední Archiv Zeměměřictví a Katastru], 2018.
  64. ÚAZK Central Archive of Surveying and Land Register Online: archivnimapy.cuzk.cz (accessed 15 May 2018).
  65. Wickham H, 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
  66. Wickham H., 2011. The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 40(1): 1–29.
  67. Woitschová K., 2017. Hidden Treasures: Challenging Traps of Historical Sources for Environmental History. In E. Vaz, C. Joanaz de Melo, L.M. Costa Pinto (eds.), Environmental History in the Making 6: 109–122. DOI 10.1007/978- 3-319-41085-2_7.
  68. Yang Y., Zhang S., Yang J., Chang L., Bu K., Xing X., 2014. A review of historical reconstruction methods of land use/ land cover. Journal of Geographical Sciences 24(4): 746–766. DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1117-z.
  69. Žiberna I., 2015. Natural geographical features and land use in the municipality of Zavrč. Geografski pregled 36: 51–64.