Main Article Content

Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk


Institutional support, reflected not only in legislative solutions, but also in external funding as a means of financial support, is of strategic importance for the success of new power investments, the guarantee of energy security of individual areas, and the socio-economic development of the region where new energy enterprises are located. The present study aims to follow the external funding of biogas investments carried out in Poland, both in the aspect of legal regulations, and the offered co-financing of biogas projects. Considering that biogas enterprises are located and operate in specific places and local systems, the present research problem is tackled from the perspective of the functioning of biogas plants in the local environment. The success of biogas projects and the entire energy transformation process depends, on the one hand, on the harmonisation of activities at the central, national level and, on the other hand, on taking into account the specific socio-economic features that characterise the location of the biogas plant. Therefore, providing comprehensive institutional support for investment for biogas enterprises requires equipping local institutions, including local authorities, with appropriate instruments to shape and monitor the agricultural biogas market at the local level.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J. (2019). INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR BIOGAS ENTERPRISES – THE LOCAL PERSPECTIVE. Quaestiones Geographicae, 38(2), 137-147.


  1. Bluemling B., Mol A.P.J., Tu Q., 2013. The social organization of agricultural biogas production and use. Energy Policy 63: 10–17. DOI:
  2. Buzar S., 2007. Energy poverty in Eastern Europe. Hidden geographies of deprivation. Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington.
  3. Chodkowska-Miszczuk J., 2014. Odnawialne źródła energii i ich wykorzystanie jako nowe trendy na obszarach wiejskich (Renewable energy sources and their use as new trends in rural areas in Poland). In: Wójcik M. (ed.), Regionalny wymiar przemian polskiej wsi – aspekty społeczne i środowiskowe (Regional dimension of Polish rural changes - social and environmental aspects), Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 35: 227–241.
  4. Chodkowska-Miszczuk J., Biegańska J., Środa-Murawska S., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Rogatka K., 2016. European Union funds in the development of renewable energy sources in Poland in the context of the cohesion policy. Energy & Environment (Brentwood) 27(6–7): 713–725. DOI:
  5. Chodkowska-Miszczuk J., Kulla M., Novotny L., 2017. The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 35: 19–364. DOI:
  6. Frantál B., Van der Horst D., Martinát S., Schmitz S., Teschner N., Silva L., Golobic M., Roth M., 2018. Spatial targeting, synergies and scale: Exploring the criteria of smart practices for siting renewable energy projects. Energy policy 120: 85–93. DOI:
  7. Hammersley M., 1992. What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. Longman, London.
  8. Huber M.T., 2009. Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production. Geoforum 40(1): 105–115. DOI:
  9. Jasiulewicz M., 2010. Potencjał biomasy w Polsce (Potential of Biomass in Poland). Politechnika Koszalińska, Koszalin.
  10. Kats G.H., 1991. Energy options for Hungary a model for Eastern Europe. Energy Policy 19(9): 855–868. DOI:
  11. Kierzkowska K., 2011. Geneza, pojęcie i funkcje Krajowego Systemu Zielonych Inwestycji (Genesis, concept and functions of National Green Investment Scheme). Przegląd Prawa Ochrony Środowiska 1: 67–83.
  12. Lawson R., Williams J., 2012. Understanding energy cultures. Prepublication copy: Accepted for presentation to the annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Marketing (ANZMAC), Adelaide: University of New South Wales, December 2012,. Online: http:// (accessed: 05 January 2019).
  13. Lutyński J., 2000. Metody badań społecznych. Wybrane zagadnienia. ŁTN, Łódź.
  14. Mitchell C., 2004. Special Edition: Energy policy for a sustainable future. Energy Policy 32, 17: 1887–1889. DOI:
  15. Łucki Z., Misiak W., 2010. Energetyka a społeczeństwo. Aspekty socjologiczne. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  16. Nakata T., Silva D., Rodionov M., 2011. Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 37: 462–502. DOI:
  17. Ruester S., Schwenen S., Finger M., Glachant J.M., 2013. A post-2020 EU energy technology policy: Revisiting the Strategic Energy Technology Plan. EUI Working Paper RSCAS, 39, San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence School of Regulation.
  18. Selman P., 2010. Learning to love the landscapes of carbon-neutrality. Landscape Research 35 (2): 157–171. DOI:
  19. Shaffer B., 2009. Energy politics. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
  20. Stephenson J., Barton B., Carrington G., Gnoth D., Lawson R., Thorsnes P., 2010. Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy 38: 6120–6129. DOI:
  21. Stephenson J., Lawson R., Carrington G., Barton B., Thorsnes P., 2011. Energy Cultures – a framework for interdisciplinary research. Sweden, Linkoping: World Renewable Energy Congress, 8–13 May 2011, Energy End-Use Efficiency Issues (EEE). Online: (accessed: 30 December 2018).
  22. Unruh G.C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12): 817–830. DOI: S0301-4215(00)00070-7
  23. Wirth S., Markard J., Truffer B., Rohracher H., 2013. Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8: 20–41. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.002
  24. Woźniak E., 2017. Stan biogazowni w Polsce. Materiały problemowe CIRE. Online: item,141910,2,0,0,0,0,0,stan-biogazowni-w-polsce.html (accessed: 5 March 2019).
  25. Wójcik M., Dmochowska-Dudek K., Jeziorska-Biel P., Tobiasz-Lis P., 2018. Understanding strategies for overcoming peripherality: A Polish experience of transition. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 40: 173–192. DOI: bog-2018-0022
  26. Web references
  27. Directive of the European Parliament and the Council no. 2009/28/WE, Official Journal of the European Union L140/16. Online: (accessed: 10 December 2018).
  28. Eurostat. Online: (accessed: 30 December 2018).
  29. Internet source 1: (accessed: 11 January 2019)
  30. NITS: National IT System – reports, 2007–2013. Online: AnalizyRaportyPodsumowania/Strony/KSI_raporty. aspx (accessed: 2 December 2018).
  31. The Act of 20 February 2015 on renewable energy sources. Journal of Laws of 2015, item. 478.
  32. National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NFEP&WM). Online: (accessed: 2 December 2018).
  33. Sprawozdanie z działalności Agencji Rynku Rolnego w 2012 r. (Report on the activities of the Agricultural Market Agency in 2012), Warszawa: Agencja Rynku Rolnego, 2013. Online: analizy/sprawozdanie_2012.pdf (accessed: 24 March 2019).