MERCHANDISE TRADE IN THE EAEU INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT

Main Article Content

Olena Hrechyshkina
Maryia Samakhavets

Abstract

The paper aims to identify the main trends and recommendations for the development of merchandise trade in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) integrating environment through the analysis of its mutual and foreign (internal and external) merchandise trade. The study is based on the official statistical data for 2014–2018 and economic comparisons and systematisation (including geographical systematisation). The results show that the intensification of mutual and foreign trade in the EAEU is possible by stimulating consumer and industrial demand, enhancing exports of high tech products and diversifying exports, and strengthening the cooperation within the EAEU and with other countries and integration associations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hrechyshkina, O., & Samakhavets, M. (2019). MERCHANDISE TRADE IN THE EAEU INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT. Quaestiones Geographicae, 38(4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0038
Section
Articles

References

  1. Antonucci D., Manzocchi S., 2006. Does Turkey have a special trade relation with the EU? Economic Systems 30(2): 157–169. DOI 10.1016/j.ecosys.2005.10.003.
  2. Badinger H., Breuss F., 2004. What has determined the rapid post-war growth of intra-EU trade? Review of World Economics 140(1): 31–51. DOI 10.1007/BF02659709.
  3. Basu Das S., Kawai M., 2016. Trade regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Developments and future challenges. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore.
  4. Boitsova M.I., Fedorenko K.P., 2019. Izmeneniia v dinamike i strukture rossiiskogo eksporta vo Vetnam posle podpisaniia Soglasheniia o zone svobodnoi torgovli mezhdu EAES i SRV (Changes and structure of Russia’s imports from Vietnam after signing Free Trade Agreement between the EAEU and the SRV). Russian Foreign Economic Journal 1: 24–35.
  5. Bourdet Y., Gullstrand J., Olofsdotter K., 2007. The European Union and developing countries: Trade, aid and growth in an integrating world. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  6. Brenton P., Manchin M., 2003. Making EU trade agreements work: The role of rules of origin. The World Economy 26(5): 755–769. DOI 10.1111/1467-9701.00545.
  7. Choi J., 2017. Future of the East Asian economy in changing global value chains and trade. Journal of APEC Studies 9(1): 1–14.
  8. Daineko А.E., Beresnev D.V., 2015. Sovershenstvovanie integratsionnykh protsessov v ramkakh Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Improving the integration processes within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union).
  9. Eurasian Integration: Economy, Law, Policy 17: 19–27. Eurasian Economic Commission, n.d. Analiticheskie materialy (Analytical materials). Online: eurasiancommission.org/ ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/tradestat/analytics/Pages/default.aspx (accessed: 17 March 2019).
  10. Eurasian Economic Commission, 2017. Doklad “O sostoianii vzaimnoi torgovli mezhdu gosudarstvami – chlenami Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza v 2015–2016 godakh” (Report “On the state of mutual trade between the Eurasian Economic Union member states in 2015–2016”). Online: eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/tradestat/analytics/Documents/report/Report_2015-2016.pdf#pagemode=bookmarks (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  11. Eurasian Economic Commission, 2018. Vzaimnaia torgovliai. Ianvar–dekabr 2018 (Mutual trade. January–December 2018). Online: eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/tradestat/tables/intra/Pages/2018/12.aspx (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  12. Eurasian Economic Commission, 2019. Ob itogakh vneshnei i vzaimnoi torgovli tovarami Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (On the outcome of mutual merchandise trade of the Eurasian Economic Union. January–December 2018). Online: eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/tradestat/analytics/Documents/express/December2018.pdf (accessed: 16 March 2019).
  13. Eurasian Economic Union, 2014. Dogovor o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soiuze (Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union). Online: eaeunion.org/files/history/2014/2014_2. pdf (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  14. Eurasian Economic Union, 2017. Dogovor o Tamozhennom kodekse Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza ot 11.04. 2017 (Treaty on the Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union dated 04.04.2017). Online: docs.eaeunion.org/ docs/ru-ru/01413569/itia_12042017 (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  15. Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: v interesakh biznesa i grazhdan (Eurasian Economic Union: in the interests of business and citizens), n.d.. Online: eurasiancommission.org/ru/ act/integr_i_makroec/dep_razv_integr/Documents/ Издания/Бизнес%20и%20граждане (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  16. Gavin B., Sindzingre A., 2008. EU trade relations with emerging Asia: Identifying the issues. Asia Europe Journal 7(1): 9–22. DOI 10.1007/s10308-008-0220-0.
  17. Kehoe L., Reis T., Virah-Sawmy M., Balmford A., Kuemmerle T., 2019. Make EU trade with Brazil sustainable. Science 364(6438): 341.1–341. DOI 10.1126/science.aaw8276.
  18. Kox H., Lejour A., Montizaan R., 2004. Intra-EU trade and investment in service sectors, and regulation patterns. CPB Memorandum 102, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  19. Hrechyshkina O., Samakhavets M., 2018. Importance of foreign direct investment in financing for innovative development of the Republic of Belarus. Marketing and Management of Innovations 4: 339–348. DOI 10.21272/mmi.2018.4-29.
  20. Hur J., Lee H., 2017. APEC has indeed created intra-regional trade: A systematic empirical analysis. The Singapore Economic Review 62(05): 1077–1095. DOI 10.1142/S0217590815501039.
  21. Ivanova E.M., 2015. Evraziiskaia integratsiia: put ot SNG k EAES (Eurasian integration: From CIS to EAEU). Russian Foreign Economic Journal 6: 112–119.
  22. Jumanova R.А., 2019. Vneshneekonomicheskaia deiatelnost Respubliki Kazakhstan: uchastie v mezhdunarodnoi torgovle i v protsessakh investirovaniia (Foreign economic activity of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Participation in international trade and in investment processes). Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk 1: 175–190. DOI 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10012.
  23. Kuskov А.N., Paderina E.V., 2019. Analiz i otsenka vliianiia vzaimnoi torgovli na Vvp gosudarstv-chlenov EAES (Analysis and estimation of the influence of mutual trade on GDP EAEU member state). In: Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo: aktualnye voprosy, tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiia (Economics and entrepreneurship: Current issues, trends and development prospects): 35–40. Online: domglobus.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/%D0%A1%D0%91-12.pdf (accessed: 25 March 2019).
  24. Mandelson P., 2006. Bilateral agreements in EU trade policy. Online: kita.net/biz/html/kotis/main_report_ atta/865_1_MandelsonSpeechLSE(Oct9,2006).pdf (accessed: 23 August 2019).
  25. Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Belarus, 2018. Reformy, realizovannye v period s 01.06.2017 do 01.06.2018 (Reforms implemented in the period from 01.06.2017 to 01.06.2018). Online: economy.gov.by/ru/plan_c-ru/(accessed: 14 March 2019).
  26. National Bank of the Republic of Belarus, n.d.. Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: etapy formirovaniia (Eurasian Economic Union: stages of formation). Online: nbrb.by/today/InternationalCooperation/EEU/Formation.pdf (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  27. Nurmatov T., 2019. Perspectives of the Kyrgyz Republic on Eurasia. India Quarterly 75(1): 108–113. DOI: 10.1177/0974928418821472.
  28. Nurtasova B.E., Sadykhanova G.A., Turginbayeva A.N., Celetti D., 2018. The trade and investment cooperation of the EAEU Countries. The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration 126(4): 117–126. Online: be.kaznu.kz/index.php/math/article/view/2965 (accessed 06 April 2019).
  29. Pastore F., Ferragina A., Giovannetti G., 2009. A tale of parallel integration processes: A gravity analysis of EU trade with Mediterranean and central and eastern European countries. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance 5(2). DOI 10.2202/1475-3693.1228.
  30. Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Belarus “O Gosudarstvennoi programme “Maloe i srednee predprinimatelstvo v Respublike Belarus” na 2016–2020 gody” № 149 ot 23 fevralia 2016 g. (Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus “On the State Program “Small and medium-sized business in the Republic of Belarus” for 2016–2020” No. 149 of February 23, 2016), 2016. Online: pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=C21600149 (accessed: 16 March 2019).
  31. Presniakova E.V., Mateichuk T.S., Zaitseva E.V., 2017. Mekhanizm stimulirovaniia vzaimnykh investitsii Respubliki Belarus i gosudarstv-chlenov Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Mechanism for encouraging mutual investments of the Republic of Belarus and the Eurasian Economic Union member states). Belorusskaia nauka, Minsk.
  32. Robinson S., Thierfelde K., 2002. Trade liberalisation and regional integration: The search for large numbers. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46(4): 585–604. DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.t01-1-00057.
  33. Ruchkina G.F., Shaidullina V.K., 2019. Faktory, zatrudniaiushchie eksport tovarov EAES v treti strany i ponizhaiushchie eksportnuiu konkurentosposobnost Rossii (Factors hindering the EAEU exports to third countries and reducing Russia’s export competitiveness). Economics, Taxes & Law 12(1): 136–143. DOI 10.26794/1999-849X2019-12-1-136-143.
  34. Scollay R., Gilbert J., 2000. Measuring the gains from APEC trade liberalisation: An overview of CGE assessments. The World Economy 23(2): 175–197. DOI 10.1111/1467- 9701.00267.
  35. Selisheva T.А., 2017. Sopriazhenie EAES i proekta “Ekonomicheskii poias Shelkovogo puti” kak novaia model evraziiskoi integratsii (Conjunction of EEC and the “Economic zone of the Great Silk Road” project as a new model of Eurasian integration). Problems of Modern Economics 4(64): 25–29.
  36. Shin Y., Serlenga L., 2007. Gravity models of intra-EU trade: Application of the CCEP-HT estimation in heterogeneous panels with unobserved common time-specific factors. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2): 361–381.
  37. Skirko N.I., 2018. Razvitie vneshnei torgovli Respubliki Belarus v usloviiakh stanovleniia edinogo rynka EAES (Development of foreign trade of the Republic of Belarus in the context of the formation of a single EAEU market). Online: elib. bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/216033/1/122-126.pdf (accessed: 20 March 2019).
  38. Spanov M., Arbashiyeva A., 2019. The role of border cooperation of Kazakhstan with the EAEU countries in the economic development of cross-border regions. The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration 126(4): 127–138.
  39. Solis M., Wilson J., 2017. From APEC to mega-regionals: The evolution of the Asia-Pacific trade architecture. The Pacific Review 30(6): 923–937. DOI 10.1080/09512748.2017.1305438.
  40. Viartsinskaya T.S., 2013. Metodicheskie osnovy razrabotki kompleksa indikatorov dlia otsenki ekonomicheskoi integratsii regionov stran-chlenov EEP (Methodical basis for the development of the set of assessment indicators of the economic integration of the regions of the CES member countries). Journal of Eurasian Economic Integration 2(19): 21–44.
  41. Viartsinskaya T.S., 2018. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie osnovy ekonomicheskoi integratsii regionov stran – chlenov EAES: na primere uchastiia Respubliki Belarus (Theoretical and practical bases of economic integration of regions of the EAEU member states: On the example of the Republic of Belarus participation). Belaruskaia navuka, Minsk.
  42. Vinokurov E., 2015. Opyt regionalnykh integratsionnykh obieedinenii: uroki dlia EAES (Experience of regional integrational associations: Lessons for EAEU). Journal of Eurasian Economic Integration 2(27): 94–97.
  43. Vinokurov E., Tsukarev T., 2015. Agenda for the EEU Economy. Valdai Papers 25. Online: eabr.org/upload/ iblock/1e0/agenda_for_the_eeu_economy.pdf (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  44. World Bank Group, 2019. Doing Business 2019. Training for reform (16th ed.). D.C. Washington. Online: worldbank. org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB2019-report_web-version.pdf (accessed: 15 March 2019).
  45. Zelenkov Y., Spitsina D., Ogloblina E., 2019. The Eurasian Economic Union: At a crossroads? In: 37th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – “Socio Economic Problems of Sustainable Development”. Online: researchgate.net/profile/Lukasz_Sulkowski/publication/331321002_Organizational_Identity_of_University_in_Merger_Process_w_37th_International_Scientific_ Conference_on_Economic_and_Social_Development_-_ Socio_Economic_Problems_of_Sustainable_Development_-_Baku_14-15_/links/5c7512bf458515831f702381/ Organizational-Identity-of-University-in-Merger-Process-w-37th-International-Scientific-Conference-on-Economic-and-Social-Development-Socio-Economic-Problems-of-Sustainable-Development-Baku-14-1.pdf (accessed: 21 March 2019).
  46. Zhuravleva G.P., Tutaeva D.R., 2018. EAES kak novyi etap mezhdunarodnoi integratsii (The Eurasian Economic Union as a new stage in international integration). Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 4: 190–196. DOI 10.21686/2413-2829-2018-4-190-196.
  47. Ziiaddulaev N., 2014. EAES: mezhdu politikoi i ekonomikoi (EAEU: Between politics and economy). Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management 11: 25–37.