Main Article Content

Jadwiga Biegańska
Mirek Dymitrow
Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska


1989 was a turning point in the socio-economic development in the former Eastern bloc, initiating a systemic transformation that affected the society at large. It also contributed to the crystallisation of certain cultural landscapes, hitherto largely illegible due to the inhibition of spatial processes encountered during socialism. In Poland, after a quarter-century of a free market economy, the focus on social problems began to expand to the spatial realm as well. It became apparent that the progressive social polarisation that followed was most prominent in environments striated by a particular landscape type – the former State Agricultural Farm (PGR). Considering PGRs as ‘the epitome of rurality’ subject to ideas informing about the direction of contemporary ‘rural development’ prompts a different way of looking at the problem. In this paper, we investigate the concept of rurality in the discursive tenor of implemented policy and contrast it with contextualised empirical examples. Our findings suggest that an efficient policy should be confronted with the expectations of residents at the local level, and introducing top-down actions usually ends in failure as in the case of post-PGR estates.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Biegańska, J., Dymitrow, M., & Grzelak-Kostulska, E. (2019). FROM POLICY TO MISERY? THE STATE AGRICULTURAL FARMS VS. ‘THE RURAL’. Quaestiones Geographicae, 38(4), 77–90.


  1. Bereza A., Kasprzak T., 2004. Wewnętrzny Sybir czyli ballada o pegeerach (Interior Siberia aka the ballad about State Agricultural Farms). Niebieska Linia 5(34): 6–9.
  2. Biegańska J., 2018. Dysfunctionality vs. urban-rural solutions: Can it work? Keynote at: Mistra Urban Futures, Wicked problems or wicked solutions? Sustainability-differently. Gothenburg, Sweden.
  3. Biegańska J., 2019. Społeczno-geograficzny wymiar przemian stref podmiejskich w Polsce (Socio-geographical dimension of changes of suburbs in Poland). UMK, Toruń.
  4. Biegańska J., Dymitrow M., Grzelak-Kostulska E., 2014b. Under urban mask: On rural landscapes with different logics. Special session at the 26th Permanent European Conference on the Study of the Rural Landscape – “Unraveling the logics of landscape”, 8–12 September 2014. Gothenburg, Sweden.
  5. Biegańska J., Dymitrow M., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Środa-Murawska S., Szymańska D., 2018. Rural development vs. conceptually induced harm. In: Tanvig H.W., Herslund L. (eds), Challenged ruralities: Welfare states under pressure. Fifth Nordic Rural Research Conference, Vingsted, 14–16 May 2018. Conference book: 54–55. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
  6. Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Dymitrow M., 2014a. The “agri-ghetto”: On dysfunctional landscapes and the rural-urban paradox. In: PECSRL 2014 Organizing Committee (eds), Unraveling the logics of landscape: 26th session of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape, PECSRL 2014, 8–12 September 2014 in Gothenburg and Mariestad, Sweden: 130–131. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
  7. Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Dymitrow M., Chodkowska-Miszczuk J., Środa-Murawska S., Rogatka K., 2016. Młodzież z osiedli popegeerowskich a kształtowanie społecznych zasobów lokalnych (Youth of former State Agricultural Farm estates as local human resources). Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 44: 75–92.
  8. Borowski A., 2013. Cooperative and national agricultural farm as total institutions. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 11: 100–105.
  9. Cloke P., 1993. On ‘problems and solutions’. The reproduction of problems for rural communities in Britain during the 1980s. Journal of Rural Studies 9(2): 113–121.
  10. Cloke P., 2006. Conceptualizing rurality. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds), Handbook of rural studies. Sage, London: 18–28.
  11. Cloke P., Davies L., 1992. Deprivation and lifestyles in Rural Wales. – I. Towards a Cultural Dimension. Journal of Rural Studies 8(4): 349–358.
  12. Cloke P., Goodwin M., 1992. Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-Fordism to rural structured coherence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17: 321–336.
  13. Cloke P., Goodwin M., Milbourne P., Thomas C., 1995. Deprivation, poverty and marginalization in rural lifestyles in England and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies 11(4): 351– 365.
  14. Cloke P., Johnston R., 2005. Deconstructing human geography’s binaries. In: Cloke P., Johnston R. (eds), Spaces of geographical thought: Deconstructing human gegraphy’s binaries. Sage, London: 1–20.
  15. Cloke P., Milbourne P., 1992. Deprivation and lifestyles in Rural Wales. – II. Rurality and the cultural dimension. Journal of Rural Studies 8(4): 359–371.
  16. Copus A., Hall C., Barnes A., Dalton G., Weingarten P.C.P., Baum S., Stange H., Lindner C., Hill A., Eiden G., McQuaid R., Grieg M., Johansson M., 2006. Study on employment in rural areas. A study commissioned by: European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture Unit F.3. Consistency of Rural Development Contract No. 30- CE-0009640/00-32.
  17. Daszkiewicz M., 2012. Badanie wizerunku terytorialnego z wykorzystaniem metod opartych na swobodzie skojarzeń (Research on the territorial image using methods based on free association). In: Mazurek-Łopacińska K. (ed.), Nauki o Zarządzaniu (Teachings on management), WUE, Wrocław: 74–83.
  18. The decree of the Polish National Liberation Committee from the 6 September 1944 on the implementation of the agricultural reform (Journal of Laws, 1944. No. 4(17) (Dekret Polskiego Komitetu Wyzwolenia Narodowego z dnia 6 września 1944 r. o przeprowadzeniu reformy rolnej (Dziennik Ustaw 1944 nr 4 pozycja 17)): 18–21.
  19. Duncan C., 1999. Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. Yale University Press, New Haven.
  20. Duncan S.S., Savage M., 1989. Space, scale and locality. Antipode 21: 179–206.
  21. Dymitrow M., 2014. The effigy of urbanity or a rural parody? A visual approach to small-town public space. Journal of Cultural Geography 31(1): 1–31. DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2013.873298
  22. Dymitrow M., 2013. Degraded towns in Poland as cultural heritage. Journal International Journal of Heritage Studies 19(7): 613–631.
  23. Dymitrow M., 2014. The effigy of urbanity or a rural parody? A visual approach to small-town public space. Journal of Cultural Geography 31(1): 1–31.
  24. Dymitrow M., 2017. Rural/urban redux. School of Business, Economics and Law, Department of Economy and Society. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
  25. Dymitrow M., 2018. Rural/urban: Laying bare the controversy. Geographia Polonica 91(4): 375–397.
  26. Dymitrow M., Brauer R., 2017. Performing rurality. But who? Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 38: 27–45.
  27. Dymitrow M., Stenseke M., 2016. Rural-urban blurring and the subjectivity within. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 3(1): 1–13. Doi: 10.16993/rl.1
  28. Dymitrow M., Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., 2018. Deprivation and the rural-urban trap. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 109(1): 87–108. Doi: 10.1111/ tesg.12263
  29. Feltynowski M., Senetra A., Biegańska J., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Dymitrow M., Środa-Murawska S., 2015. Some problems of local development: The example of former State Agricultural Farms in Poland. Research for rural development 2015: Annual 21th International Scientific Conference: Proceedings 2: 237–243.
  30. Gregory M., 1994. Discourse. In: Johnston R.J., Gregory D., Smith D.M. (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography. Blackwell, Oxford.
  31. Halfacree K.H., 1993. Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 23–37.
  32. Halfacree K., 2006. Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds), Handbook of rural studies: Sage, London: 44–62.
  33. Halfacree K., 2009. Urban-rural continuum. In: International encyclopedia of human geography 1: 119–124.
  34. Hoggart K., 1990. Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9: 245–257.
  35. Jałowiecki B., 1988. Lokalne ruchy społeczne w perspektywie procesów globalnych (Local social movements in the perspective of globalization). In: Dutkiewicz P., Gorzelak G. (eds), Problemy rozwoju lokalnego, IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa: 9–31.
  36. Jonard F., Lambotte M., Ramos F., Terres J.M., Bamps C., 2009. Delimitations of rural areas in Europe using criteria of population density, remoteness and land cover. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. EUR, 23757.
  37. Jones O., 1995. Lay discourses of the rural: Development and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies 11: 35–49.
  38. Karwacki A., 2002. The culture of poverty in the post-state farm community. Eastern European Countryside 8: 79–93.
  39. Kay R., 2012. Managing everyday (in)securities: Normative values, emotional security and symbolic recognition in the lives of Russian rural elders. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 63–71.
  40. Kay R., Shubin S., Thelen T., 2012. Rural realities in the post-socialist space (editorial). Journal of Rural Studies 28: 55–62.
  41. Korab K., 1997. Społeczne ofiary eksperymentu ideologiczno-naukowego (Social victims of the ideological and scientific experiment). In: Ludzie i ziemia po upadku PGR-ów. Analiza socjologiczna i ekonomiczna (People and land after the fall of State Agricultural Farms. Social and economic analysis). SGGW, Warszawa.
  42. Kraciński P., 2011. The disposition of agricultural property of the National Treasury 1992–2009 (Rozdysponowanie Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa w latach 1992–2009). Ekonomika Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej 87: 41–53. (In Polish)
  43. Krzysztofik R., Dymitrow M., Biegańska J., Senetra A., Gavriilidou E., Nadolu B., Kantor-Pietraga I., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Oureilidou E., Luches D., Spórna T., Brauer R., 2017a. Landscapes with different logics: A physicalistic approach to semantic conflicts in spatial planning. Quaestiones Geographicae 36(4): 29–45. Doi: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0034
  44. Krzysztofik R., Dymitrow M., Grzelak-Kostulska E., Biegańska J., 2017b. Poverty and social exclusion: An alternative spatial explanation. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 35: 45–64.
  45. Lefebvre H., 1991. The production of space. Blackwell, Oxford.
  46. Lobao L.M., Hooks G., Tickamyer A.R., 2008. Poverty and inequality across space: Sociological reflections on the missing-middle subnational scale. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1: 89–113.
  47. Mormont M., 1990. Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In: Marsden T., Lowe P., Whatmore S. (eds), Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses. David Fulton, London: 21–44.
  48. Pasieka A., 2012. Resurrected pigs, dyed foxes and beloved cows: Religious diversity and nostalgia for socialism in rural Poland. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 72–80.
  49. Pile S., 1999. What is a city? In: Massey D., Allen J., Pile S. (eds), City worlds. Routledge, New York: 3.
  50. Porta J., Parapara J., Doalloa R., Barbosab V., Santéb I., Crecenteb R., Díaz C., 2013. A population-based iterated greedy algorithm for the delimitation and zoning of rural settlements. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 39: 12–26.
  51. Psyk-Piotrowska E., 1996. Postawy pracowników byłych PGR i dzierżawców wobec przemian w rolnictwie (Attitudes of former State Agricultural Farms’ employees and tenants towards changes in agriculture). Wieś i Rolnictwo 2.
  52. Psyk-Piotrowska E., 1998. Bezrobocie i pauperyzacja środowisk dawnych PGR w Polsce (Unemployment and pauperisation of former State Agricultural Farms’ communities in Poland). Wieś i Rolnictwo 3.
  53. Psyk-Piotrowska E., 2004. Społeczne konsekwencje przekształceń własnościowych w rolnictwie państwowym (Social consequences of ownership transformation in state agriculture). Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź.
  54. Psyk-Piotrowska E., 2011. Aktywizacja i rozwój lokalny jako program i metoda działania na rzecz zmian (Activation and local development as a program and a method of changes). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Sociologica 37: 149–169.
  55. Rank M., 2004. One nation, underprivileged. Oxford University Press, New York.
  56. Reilly M.D., 1990. Free elicitation of descriptive adjectives for tourism image assessment. Journal of Travel Research 28(4): 21–26.
  57. Ritchie J.R.B, Crouch G.I., 2003. The competitive destination. CABI Publishing, Cambridge: 304.
  58. Rosner A., 2002 (ed.). Wiejskie obszary kumulacji barier rozwojowych (Rural areas as cumulative developmental barriers), IRWiR PAN, Warszawa: 214.
  59. Rosner A., 2007 (ed.). Zróżnicowanie poziomu rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego obszarów wiejskich a zróżnicowanie dynamiki przemian (Differences in the socio-economic development of rural areas and the dynamics of change), IRWiR PAN, Warszawa: 279.
  60. Ruzicka M., 2005. Continuity or rapture? Roma/Gypsy communities in rural and urban environments under post-socialism. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 81–88.
  61. Sakson A., 2003. Kształtowanie się nowej społeczności powiatu słupskiego po 1945 roku na tle przemian społecznych na Ziemiach Zachodnich i Północnych (The creation of new communities in the Słupsk district after 1945 to the background of societal transformations in Western and Northern Territories). In: Czarnik A. (ed.), Obrazy Ziemi Słupskiej. Społeczeństwo-administracja-kultura, Materiały z VII Konferencji Kaszubsko-Pomorskiej, Słupsk: 132–139.
  62. Schiller B.R., 2004. The economics of poverty and discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  63. Sokołowski D., 1999. Zróżnicowanie zbioru małych miast i większych osiedli wiejskich w Polsce w ujęciu koncepcji kontiuum wiejsko-miejskiego (Differences between small towns and larger villages in Poland according to the concept of the rural-to-urban continuum). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
  64. Suliborski A., Kulawiak A., 2017. Transformacja Państwowych Gospodarstw Rolnych Sarnów i Bełdów w województwie łódzkim w prywatne przedsiębiorstwa. Konsekwencje społeczne (Trasformation of State Agricultural Farms Sarnów and Bełdów in Łódzkie voivodship into private enterprises. Social consequences). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica 29: 5−26. Doi:
  65. Szarfenberg R., 2011 (ed.). Krajowy Raport Badawczy “Pomoc i integracja społeczna wobec wybranych grup – diagnoza standaryzacji usług i modeli instytucji” (National Research Report “Social assistance and integration for selected groups – a diagnosis of the standardisation of services and institutions’ models”). Wrzos, Warszawa.
  66. Szymańska D., Biegańska J., 2011. Fenomen urbanizacji i procesy z nim związane (Phenomenon of urbanisation and processes connected with it). Studia Miejskie 4: 13–38.
  67. Tarkowska E., 2001. An underclass without ethnicity: The poverty of Polish women and agricultural laborers. In: Emigh R., Fodor E., Szelényi I. (eds), Poverty, ethnicity & gender in Eastern Europe during the market transition. Praeger, Westport: 83–122.
  68. Tickamyer A.R., 2009. Poverty, rural. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds), Handbook of rural studies. Sage, London: 416–420.
  69. Wilkin J., 1997. Przekształcenia sektora państwowych gospodarstw rolnych w Polsce w opinii władz lokalnych i mieszkańców „osiedli pegeerowskich” (Transformation of the former State Agricultural Farms in Poland according to local authorities and the local residents of postSAF estates). In: Korab K. (ed.), Ludzie i ziemia po upadku pegeerów (People and land after the fall of State Agricultural Farms). Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa: 44–75.
  70. Williams R., 1975. The country and the city. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  71. Woods M., 2005. Rural geography. Sage, London.
  72. Woods M., 2008 (ed.). New Labour’s Countryside: British Rural Policy since 1997. Policy Press, Bristol.
  73. Woods M., 2011. Rural. Routledge, New York.
  74. Woodward R., 1996. ‘Deprivation’ and ‘the rural’: An investigation into contradictory discourses. Journal of Rural Studies 12(1): 55–67.