‘CITTASLOW’: AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OR JUST A MYTH? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF TARAKLI (TURKEY)

Main Article Content

Öznur Akgiş İlhan
Erdal Karakaş
Büşra Özkaraman

Abstract

This research attempts to answer whether Cittaslow is a myth or an effective model for development for Taraklı, a small town in the Sakarya province of Turkey. The study was designed and analysed using the mixed method research model. The results are as follows. Since Taraklı became a Cittaslow, the number of tourists increased which ultimately helped to fight against unemployment and also increased income of people. Women’s participation in the labour force had increased and their representation in public places was enhanced. Important steps were taken towards the preservation of cultural heritage. Along with quantitative and qualitative improvements in green areas, the local people’s awareness of environmental protection has increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
İlhan, Öznur A., Karakaş, E., & Özkaraman, B. (2020). ‘CITTASLOW’: AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OR JUST A MYTH? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IN THE CASE OF TARAKLI (TURKEY). Quaestiones Geographicae, 39(4), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0029
Section
Articles

References

  1. Aktaş S.G., 2016. Serbest Zaman, Seyahat ve Turizm (Leisure, Travel and Tourism). In: Aktaş S.G. (ed.), Turizm Coğrafyası Kitabı Içinde (Tourism Geography). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir: 3–36.
  2. Ashley C., Mitchell J., 2006. Can tourism reduce poverty in Africa? Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Briefing Paper. London, UK.
  3. Aslan E., 2015. Sakarya-Taraklı Örneğinde Avrupalı Seçkin Destinasyonlar (EDEN) ve Sürdürülebilir Turizm (European destinations of excellence (EDEN) and sustainable tourism: The Sakarya-Taraklı case), Atılım Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  4. Baldemir E., Kaya F., Şahin T.K., 2013. A management strategy within sustainable city context: Cittaslow. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 99: 75–84.
  5. Başarangil İ., Ulaş Ş., 2017. A research on the perceptions, attitudes and life satisfaction of the Cittaslow citizens — sample of Vize county. International Journal of Business and Social Science 8(1): 107–116.
  6. Batyk I., Woźniak M., 2019. Benefits of belonging to the Cittaslow network in the opinion of residents of member cities. Economic and Regional Studies/Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne 12(1): 56–67.
  7. Bauman Z., 2012. Küreselleşme, Toplumsal Sonuçları (Globalisation, social consequences). Çev. Abdullah Yılmaz, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
  8. Bekar A., Yozukmaz N., Sürücü Ç., Gövce A.M., 2015. The concept of Cittaslow as a marketing tool for destination development: The case of Muğla, Turkey. American International Journal of Social Science 4(3): 54–64.
  9. Bird A., 2011. Wine + Food = Record Year: Event’s Economic Impact Highest Ever, Analysis Finds. Online: https://www.crda.org/news/local_news/wine-food-record year-events-economic-impact-highest-ever-analysis finds/ (accessed: 10 January 2020).
  10. Botta M., 2016. Evolution of the slow living concept within the models of sustainable communities. Futures 80: 3–16.
  11. Cantek F.Ş., Ulutaş Ç.Ü., Çakmak Ş., 2014. Evin İçindeki Sokak, Sokağın İçindeki Ev: Kamusal ile Özel ‘ara’sında Kalanlar (The street inside the house, the house inside the street: People remaining between public and private). In: Cantek F.Ş. (ed), Kenarın Kitabı:‘Ara’da Kalmak, Çeperde Yaşamak içinde (The book of the edge: Staying between, living on the edge). İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul: 121–159.
  12. Çavaç Z., 2008. Sakarya İli Taraklı İlçesinde El Sanatları Ve Zanaatları (Hand crafts and arts specific to Taraklı a district of Sakarya), Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Türk Dili Ve Edebiyatı Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  13. Creswell J., 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, London.
  14. Creswell J.W., Clark V.L.P., 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
  15. Crouch G.I., Ritchie J.R.B., 1999. Tourism competitiveness and societal prosperity. Journal of Business Research 44(3): 137–152.
  16. Daly K.J., 2001. Introduction: Minding the time: Toward a theoretical expansion of time in families. In: Daly K.J. (ed.), Minding the time in family experience: Emerging perspectives and issues (1st Ed., Vol. 3). JAI, Amsterdam; New York.
  17. Değirmenci İ., Sarıbıyık M., 2015. Tarihi Mekanlarda Sürüdürülebilirlik Bağlamında Cittaslow Hareketi: Taraklı Örneği (Cittaslow movement at historical places in the context of sustainability: Example of Taraklı), 2nd International Buildings Symposium, 612–620, Ankara, Türkiye.
  18. Dickinson J.E., Lumsdon L.M., Robbins D., 2011. Slow travel: Issues for tourism and climate change. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19(3): 281–300.
  19. Doyduk H.B.B., Okan E.Y., 2017. Sustainable city branding: Cittaslow – the case of Turkey. In Advertising and Branding: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global: 1013–1032.
  20. Dwyer L., Forsyth P., Spurr R., 2004. Evaluating tourism’s economic effects: New and old approaches. Tourism Management 25(3): 307–317.
  21. Ekinci M.B., 2014. The Cittaslow philosophy in the context of sustainable tourism development; the case of Turkey. Tourism Management 41: 178–189.
  22. Gearing C.E., Swart W.W., Var T., 1974. Establishing a measure of touristic attractiveness. Journal of Travel Research 12(4): 1–8.
  23. Hall C.M., 2006. Introduction: Culinary tourism and regional development: From slow food to slow tourism? Tourism Review International 9(4): 303–305.
  24. Han J.H., Kim J.S., Lee C.K., Kim N., 2019. Role of place attachment dimensions in tourists’ decision-making process in Cittáslow. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 11: 108–119.
  25. Harvey D., 1989. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford Blackwell.
  26. Heitmann S., Robinson P., Povey G., 2011. Slow food, slow cities and slow tourism, In: Robinson P., Heitmann S., Dieke P. (eds), Research themes for tourism. CAB International, Wallingford: 114–127.
  27. Hekimci F., 2014. Sürdürülebilir Bir Yerel Kalkınma Modeli: ‘’Yavaş Şehirler’’ Ve Ekoturizm (Sustainable Local Development and Slow Cities). Kalkınmada Anahtar Verimlilik Dergisi, T.C. Bilim Sanayi Ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, Verimlilik Genel Müdürlüğü (Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology, General Directorate of Productivity), Ankara.
  28. Howard C., 2012. Speeding up and slowing down. In: Fullagari Markwell and Wilson (eds), Slow tourism: Experi ences and mobilities. Channel View, Bath UK: 11–24.
  29. Kan H., 2009. Taraklı Yerleşimindeki Tarihi Dokunun Sürdürülebilirliği Bağlamında Kentsel Koruma ve Geliştirme Stratejileri (Urban conservation and development strategies for sustainable historical heritage in Taraklı), Bartın Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  30. Karabağ O., Yucel F., İnal M.E., 2012. Cittaslow movement: An opportunity for branding small towns and economic development in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Research 313: 64–75.
  31. Lee C.K., Taylor T., 2005. Critical reflections on the economic impact assessment of a mega-event: The case of 2002 FIFA World Cup. Tourism Management 26(4): 595–603.
  32. Lin L.P., 2017. Industrial tourists’ behavioral intention toward slow travel in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25(3): 379–396.
  33. Losada N., Mota G., 2019. ‘Slow down, your movie is too fast’: Slow tourism representations in the promotional videos of the Douro region (Northern Portugal). Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 11: 140–149.
  34. Lumsdon L.M., McGrath P., 2011. Developing a conceptual framework for slow travel: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19(3): 265–279.
  35. Marin D., 1992. Is the export-led hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Review of Economics and Statistics 74: 678–688.
  36. Mayer H., Knox P., 2006. Slow cities: Sustainable places in a fast world. Journal of Urban Affairs 28: 321–334.
  37. McElroy J.L., 2003. Small Island tourist economies across the lifecycle, Paper prepared for The International Conference, Beyond MIRAB: The Political Economy of Small Islands in the 21st Century, School of Economics and Finance, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand, 23–25 February 2003.
  38. McKinnon R.I., 1964. Foreign exchange constraints in economic development and efficient aid allocation. Economic Journal 74: 388–409.
  39. Nilsson J.H., Svard A.C., Widarsson A., Wirell T., 2007. ‘Slow’ destination marketing in small Italian towns, Paper presented to the 16th Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality Research, Helsingborg, 2007.
  40. Nilsson J.H., Svärd A.C., Widarsson Å., Wirell T., 2011. ‘Cittáslow’eco-gastronomic heritage as a tool for destination development. Current Issues in Tourism 14(4): 373–386.
  41. Özkan S., 2008. Taraklı’nın Fiziksel ve Tarihsel Dokusu, Sivil Ve Anıtsal Mimarlık Örnekleri Hacı Rıfatlar Konağı Restorasyonu (Physical and historical properties of Taraklı, civil and monumental architecturel samples, restoration of Hacı Rıfatlar mansion). Yıldız Teknik Univer sity, Institute of Science, İstanbul.
  42. Pablo-Romero M.D.P., Molina J.A., 2013. Tourism and economic growth: A review of empirical literature. Tourism Management Perspectives 8: 28–41.
  43. Park E., Kim S., 2016. The potential of Cittaslow for sustainable tourism development: Enhancing local community’s empowerment. Tourism Planning & Development 13(3): 351–369.
  44. Petrini C., 2001. Slow food: The case for taste, Columbia University Press, New York.
  45. Pink S., 2008. Sense and sustainability: The case of the slow city movement. Local Environment 13: 99–106.
  46. Presenza A., Abbate T., Micera R., 2015b. The Cittaslow movement: Opportunities and challenges for the governance of tourism destinations. Tourism Planning & Develop ment 12(4): 479–488.
  47. Presenza A., Abbate T., Perano M., 2015a. The Cittaslow certification and its effects on sustainable tourism governance. Enlightening Tourism. A Pathmaking Journal, 5(1): 40–64.
  48. Radstrom S., 2011. A place-sustaining framework for local urban identity: An introduction and history of Cittaslow. Italian Journal of Planning Practice 1(1): 90–113.
  49. Rogers T., 2008. Conferences and conventions: A global industry (2nd Ed.). Elsevier Ltd, Burlington, MA.
  50. Semmens J., Freeman C., 2012. The value of Cittaslow as an approach to local sustainable development: A New Zealand perspective. International Planning Studies 17(4): 353–375.
  51. Senetra A., Szarek-Iwaniuk P., 2020. Socio-economic development of small towns in the Polish Cittaslow network — A case study. Cities 103: 102758.
  52. Sugiyama M., Nobuoka S., 2007. From slow food to slow tourism. Tokai Women’s Junior College: 1–8.
  53. Taraklı Municipality. 2017. Taraklı’da Turizm (Tourism in Taraklı). Online: http://www.tarakli.bel.tr/kultur_turizm.asp (accessed: June, 2017)
  54. Tuncer S., 2015. Dışarı Çıkmak: Özelden Kamusala Feminist Bir Saha Hikâyesi (Going out: A feminist field story from the private to the public). Moment Dergi 2(2): 30–58.
  55. UN 2015. Integrating the Three Dimensions of Sustainable Development: A Framework and Tools. Online: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Integrating%20the%20three%20dimensions%20of%20sustainable%20development%20A%20framework.pdf (accessed: 28 June 2020).
  56. Vegenas M. Sr, Croes R., 2007. Tourism, economic expansion and poverty in Nicaragua: Investigating cointegration and causal relations. Online: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/7306/ (accessed: 10 January 2020).
  57. WCED 1987. Our common future. Online: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/152/WCED_v17_doc149.pdf?sequence (accessed: 28 June 2020).
  58. Wilson S., Hannam K., 2017. The frictions of slow tourism mobilities: Conceptualising campervan travel. Annals of Tourism Research 67: 25–36.
  59. Yurtseven H.R., Kaya O., 2011. Slow tourists: A comparative research based on Cittaslow principles. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 1(2): 91–98.
  60. Zuzanek J., Smale B.J.A., 1997. More work – Less leisure? Changing allocations of time in Canada. Society and Leisure 20(1): 73–106.
  61. Zuzanek J., 2004. Work, leisure, time-pressure and stress. In Haworth J.T., Veal A.T. (eds), Work and leisure. Routledge, East Sussex: 123–144.