Main Article Content

Aprilia Riszi Indah Dewi Shara
Umi Listyaningsih
Sri Rum Giyarsih


The study set out to analyse the differences in the characteristics and spatial distribution of urban beggars in Sanglah, Denpasar City. It employed survey research for data collection by observation, structured interviews with a questionnaire, and documentation. These data were later processed and analysed in a quantitative descriptive manner. The results show that, based on religion, there were two groups of beggars, namely Muslim and Hindu. Spatially, the Hindu beggars disregarded the religion of the people they implored, whereas the Muslim beggars would only target the houses and shops owned by Muslims. Those two class of beggars differ in languages, bagging duration, daily-earning, clothing, and sympathy-drawing strategy during the panhandling


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shara, A. R. I. D., Listyaningsih, U., & Giyarsih, S. R. (2020). DIFFERENCES IN THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN BEGGARS: THE CASE OF THE SANGLAH DISTRICT IN DENPASAR (INDONESIA). Quaestiones Geographicae, 39(4), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0036


  1. Andriotis K., 2016. Beggars–tourists’ interactions: An unobtrusive typological approach. Tourism Management 52: 64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.006.
  2. Bernstein J.D., 2019. Begging to travel: Begpacking in Southeast Asia. Annals of Tourism Research 77: 161–163.
  3. Broun, Idiege B., Ube M., Bisong MD, 2010. Counseling youth against drug abuse: Implication for human development. Conference proceeding. 34th Annual SCASSON conference.
  4. Bukoye R.O., 2015. Case study: Prevalence and consequences of streets begging among adults and children in Nigeria, Suleja metropolis. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 171: 323–333.
  5. Endrayani N.K.E., Dewi M.H.U., 2016. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Bali (Analysis of factors influencing poverty in regency/cities in Bali Province, Indonesia). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Undayana 5(1): 63–88.
  6. Erlandsson A., Nilsson A., Tinghög G., Andersson D., Västfjäll D., 2019. Donations to outgroup charities, but not ingroup charities, Predict helping intentions toward street-beggars in Sweden. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 48(4): 814–838.
  7. Frederick A., Joseph D., Srivastava H., 2016. Begging in India: Barricading the sustainable financial development. IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences (ISSN 2455-2267) 3(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v3.n3.p4.
  8. Fuseini T., Daniel M., 2018. Exploring the stressors and resources of Muslim child beggars in Dagbon of Northern Ghana in the context of child rights and existing realities. Cogent Social Sciences 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/233118 86.2018.1542955.
  9. Graham C., Grisard C., 2019. Rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief: Accounting and the stigma of poverty. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 59: 32–51.
  10. Hartomo and Aziz, 1997. Ilmu Sosial Dasar (Social Science). Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
  11. Iqbali S., 2005. Studi Kasus Gelandangan-Pengemis (Gepeng) Di Kecamatan Kubu Kabupaten Karangasem (Study on the case of urban beggars in the Kubu District, Karangasem Regency, Bali). Jurnal Kependudukan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia 4(1). Universitas Udayana, Jimbaran.
  12. Kamruzzaman Md., Hakim Md.A., 2015. Socio-economic status of child beggars in Dhaka City. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1(5). Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.
  13. Khan I., 2018. Socio-economic disparities among beggars in different locations of district Lahore_Pakistan. International Journal of European Studies 2(1): 1–7. doi: 10.11648/j. ijes.20180201.11.
  14. Khan M.M., Hossain M.K., Hasina N., Uddin S., Ferdousi M., 2016. Status and social evaluation towards beggars in Bangladesh: Context of Sylhet City. International Journal of Social Science Studies 4(6). E-ISSN 2324-8041.
  15. Kongoley P.S., 2017. The impact of street begging on the freetown municipality. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication 7(7): 2250–3153.
  16. Lestari P., 2014. Studi Tentang Kategorisasi Pengemis Dikota Pekanbaru (Categorisation of urban beggars (Case: Pekanbaru, Riau)). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa, FISIP Universitas Riau 2(1): 1–13.
  17. Malarvizhi V., Geetha K.T., 2016. Socio-economic issues of beggary: A study of beggars in Coimbatore City. IRA-International Journal of Management and Social Sciences 3(2): 2455–2267. https://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v3.n2.p8.
  18. Mansour E., 2017. An explanatory study into the information seeking-behaviour of Egyptian beggars. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 49(1): 91–106.
  19. Mirjat A.J., Wassan A.A., Shaikh S., 2017. Beggary in Hyderabad Division: A sociological analysis. Grassroots 51(2). Online: https://research-advances.org/index.php/RAJMSS/article/view/139/153 (accessed: 25 September 2019).
  20. Paksi A.K., Budi N.N., Susanto N.N., 2006. Motivasi Non-Ekonomi Pengemis di Kota Yogyakarta (Non-economic motivation of urban beggars in Yogyakarta). Jurnal PKMP 3(18). Jurusan Hubungan Internasional Universitas Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta.
  21. Paramita D.A.M., Suresmiathi A.A., 2012. Sektor Informal, Pengangguran Dan Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Bali Tahun 2004–2012 (Informal sector, unemployment, and poverty in Bali Province 2004–2012). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Undayana 29–38.
  22. [Perda] Peraturan Daerah Kota Denpasar Nomor 5 Tahun 2016 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Semesta Berencana Kota Denpasar Tahun 2016–2021 ([Local Regulation] Denpasar City Local Regulation Number 5, 2016 regarding the Temporary Local Middle-Period Development Planning 2016–2021).
  23. [Perda] Peraturan Daerah Kota Denpasar Nomor 27 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Den pasar Tahun 2011–2031. ([Local Regulation] Denpasar City Local Regulation Number 27, 2011 regarding the Spatial Planning of Denpasar City 2011–2031).
  24. Pérez-Muñoz C., 2018. Beneficence, street begging, and diverted giving schemes. Political Research Quarterly 71(4): 923–935.
  25. Putri I.A.S.M., Yuliarmi N.N., 2011. Beberapa Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Tingkat Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Bali (Factors influencing the poverty rate in Bali, Indonesia). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Undayana 2(10): 441–448.
  26. Qiao G., Chen N., Prideaux B., 2017. Understanding interactions between beggars and international tourists: The case of China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22(3): 272–283.
  27. Saputra I.P.E., Dewi N.P.M., 2010. Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Struktur Ekonomi Dan Belanja Pembangun Terhadap Kemiskinan Provinsi Bali (The impact of education, economic structure and development expenditure on the poverty rate in Bali, Indonesia). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Undayana 4(2): 105–112.
  28. Sekyere E.O., Jengre E., Alhaasan E., 2018. Begging in the city: Complexities, degree of organization, and embedded risks. Child Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9863410.
  29. Setyaningrum N., 2014. Fenomena Pengemis Anak Di Pasar Klewer Surakarta (Phenomenon of child beggars in Klewer Market, Surakarta). Sosialitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sosiologi-Antropologi 1–22.
  30. Shara A.R.I.D, 2019. Karakteristik Dan Sebaran Pengemis Di Kawasan Sanglah Kota Denpasar (The characteristics and spatial distribution of beggars in the Sanglah Region, Denpasar, Bali). Thesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  31. Shara A.R.I.D., 2015. Studi Kasus Eksistensi Pengemis Tipe Baru di Kecamatan Denpasar Barat (The case of new beggars category emergence in West Denpasar District). Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja.
  32. Sirojuzilam, 2006. Teori Lokasi. USU Press, Medan.
  33. Social Service of Denpasar City, 2018. Daftar Gepeng yang Telah Dipulangkan Tahun 2018 (List of Homeless and Beggars Sent Home, 2018). Dinas Sosial Kota Denpasar, Denpasar.
  34. Thamrin H., Ritonga F.U., 2018. Cutting off beggars spread in Medan. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 126(1): 012162. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012162.
  35. Thomassen B., 2015. Begging Rome: Norms at the margins, norms of the in-between. Critique of Anthropology 35(1): 94–113.
  36. Tribunenews.com 2018. “Para Pengemis di Bali Sanggup Setor Rp 1,5 Juta Per Bulan Agar Tak Diciduk” (Beggars in Bali to pay 1.5 million rupiahs (100USD) to prevent themselves of being arrested). Online: http://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2018/02/05/para-pengemis-di-bali-sanggup-setor-rp-15-juta-per-bulan-agar-tak-di-ciduk?page=all. (accessed: 25 November 2018).
  37. Yunus H.S., 2010. Metode Penelitian Wilayah Kontemporer (Contemporary spatial study method). Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.