Comprehensive assessment of meta-analysis and contingent valuation technique for sustainable management of wetland of Middle Ganga Plain

Main Article Content

Malabika Biswas Roy
Abhishek Kumar
Debanjana Chatterjee
Sudipa Halder

Abstract

In this study, the functions and threats of Suraha Tal Wetland are identified by the stated preference method and weightage is given according to their rank. The objective of the study is to determine the total economic value of Suraha Tal Wetland. The direct value can be drawn from the market price and from a survey of the stakeholders. Suraha Tal Wetland is also famous for the presence of the Jai Prakash Narayan Birds Sanctuary, which makes it a biodiversity-enriched area. The indirect value has been drawn from a review of the literature on Suraha Tal Wetland and the relevance of this literature is justified through the comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software. The total valuation of the wetland has been calculated. The paper concludes with suggestions for a few management strategies for better wetland management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roy, M. B., Kumar, A., Chatterjee, D., & Halder, S. (2022). Comprehensive assessment of meta-analysis and contingent valuation technique for sustainable management of wetland of Middle Ganga Plain. Quaestiones Geographicae, 41(2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2022-0015
Section
Articles

References

  1. Birol E., Karousakis K., Koundouri P., 2006. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece, 2-43. Paper to be presented at the Third World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.
  2. Biswas M., Samal N.R., Roy P.K., Mazumdar A., 2010. Human wetland dependency and socio-economic evaluation of wetland functions through participatory approach in rural India. Water Science and Engineering 3(4): 467-479.
  3. Biswas Roy M., Ghosh A., Kumar A., Roy P.K., 2021. Assessing the nature of seasonal meteorological change in people’s dependency on wetland: A case study of Bhagirathi-Hooghly floodplain system. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23(12). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01419-8.
  4. Biswas Roy M., Kumar A., Ghosh A., Kumar Roy P., 2020. Study to develop a co-relationship between water quality and landuse pattern as index of riverine wetland with statistical approach. Quaestiones Geographicae 39(1): 33-43. DOI https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0003.
  5. Biswas Roy M., Pal S., Pal M., Kumar Roy P., Kumar A., 2019. Study of conservation and wise use of two important Indian wetlands using contingent valuation technique. Environment Asia 12(2): 172-178. ISSN 1906-1714; Online ISSN: 2586-8861, UGC Journal No 19858.
  6. Biswas Roy M., Roy P.K., Sannal N.R., Majhumder M., 2012a. Socio-economic valuations of wetland based occupations of lower gangetic basin through participatory approach. Environment and Natural Resources Research 2: 30-44.
  7. Biswas Roy M., Roy P.K., Mazumdar A., Majumder M., Samal N.R., 2012b. Impact of land use and aquatic plants on the water quality of the sub-tropical alpine wetlands in India: A case study using neuro-genetic models. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 4(8): 576-589.
  8. Biswas Roy M., Roy P.K., Samal N.R., Mazumdar A., 2016. A comparative study of labour participation in three wetland Regions of West Bengal, India. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 97: 82-92.
  9. Borenstein M., Hedges L., Rothstein H., 2007. Meta-analysis fixed vs. random effects. Online: www.Meta-Analysis.com (accessed: 2007).
  10. Brouwer R., Langford I.H., Bateman J., Turner R.K., 1999. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change 1(1): 47-57.
  11. Bu M., Rosenberger R.S., 2014. Meta-analysis of wetland valuation study in North America: Modeling dependencies of welfare estimate across space. Online: http://recvaluation.forestry.oregonstate.edu/sites/dfault/files/WetlandSpatialMRA.pdf (accessed: 1 August 2021).
  12. Chaikumbung M., Doucouliagos H., Scarborough H., 2015. The economic value of wetlands in developing countries: A meta-regression analysis. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.022
  13. Clarkson B.R., Ausseil A.E., Gerbeaux P., 2013. Wetland ecosystem services. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/uploads/public/Publications/Ecosystem-services-in-New-Zealand/1_14_Clarkson.pdf.
  14. Costanza R., Ralph D.A., Rudolf G., Stephen F., Monica G., Bruce H., Karin L., Sahid N., Robert N., Jose P., Robert G., Raskin P.S., Marjan B., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
  15. Dymond J.R. (ed.), Ecosystem services in New Zealand: Conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand. https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/ecosystem-services-in-new-zealand/
  16. Freeman M. III,1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values. Resource for Future, Washington, D.C.
  17. Ghermandi A., Van den Bergh J.C., Brander L.M., de Groot H.L., Nunes P., 2009. The values of natural and constructed wetlands: A meta-analysis. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 7-24. DOI https://doi.org/102139/ssrn.1474751.
  18. IUCN, 1998. Economic values of protected areas: Guidelines for protected area managers. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
  19. Lakshman R., 1976. Suraha lake, its ecology and fisheries. The Indian Journal of zoology 27: 32-52.
  20. Mangal S.K., 2012. Statistics in psychology and education, 2nd Ed. PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi.
  21. Mishra S., Sharma M.P., Kumar A., 2015. Assessment of water quality in Surha Lake based on physiochemical parameters, India. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 6(9): 2446-2452.
  22. Mishra S., Sharma M.P., Kumar A., 2015. Physiological analysis of water quality in Surha Lake, India. Integrated Research Advances 2(2):22-26.
  23. Pal M., Biswas Roy M., Kumar Roy P., 2021. Study of Gumti Wetland in connection with its socio-economic status: A step towards sustainable management practices, advances in water resources management for sustainable use. Springer. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6412-7_26.
  24. Pandey K.C., Agarwal N., Sharma R.K., 2010. Fish fauna of Suraha Tal of District-Ballia (U.P.), India. Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences 2(2): 22-25.
  25. Pandey N., Lehri A., Mehrotra S., Srivastava J.B., 2015. Arsenic pollution scenario in Eastern U.P, India: A review. International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 4(2): 83-86.
  26. Rafiq R., Alam Md S., Rahman Md. M., Islam I., 2014. Conserving wetlands: Valuation of indirect use benefits of a Wetland of Dhaka. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 5(2): 64-68.
  27. Report on the economic value of wetlands: Wetlands’ role in flood protection in Western Washington 1997. Online: https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/97100.html (accessed: 1 August 2021).
  28. Report on Wetland Valuation Issues paper #2: May 2003. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303627072_Wetland_and_its_valuation_method (accessed: 1 August 2021).
  29. Rosenthal R., Di Matteo M.R., 2002. Meta-analysis, Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. Methodology in experimental psychology: 391-428. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  30. Sharma R., Soni D.K., 2013. Aqua status of Suraha Tal, located in district Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 7(4A): 2577-2585.
  31. Sharma R.K., Agrawal N., 2012a. Molluscan fauna Suraha Tal of District Ballia (U.P.), India. Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences 3(2): 295-297.
  32. Sharma R.K., Agrawal N., 2012b. Faunal diversity of aquatic insects in Suraha Tal of District Ballia (U.P.), India. Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences 4(2): 60-64.
  33. Shukla N.K., Markandeya Shukla V.K., 2015. Arsenic and physio-chemical calamity in the ground water samples of Ballia Districts, Uttar Pradesh, India. Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment 6(4): 328-333.
  34. Singh A.K., Sarkar U.K., Abidi R., Srivastava S.M., 2011. Fish biodiversity and invasion risks of alien species in some aquatic bodies under forest areas of Uttar Pradesh, National Conference on Forest Biodiversity: Earth’s Living Treasure. Online: http://www.upsbdb.org/pdf/Souvenir2011/6.pdf (accessed: 1 August 2021).
  35. Singh K., Agrawal N.C., Ahirwal R.P., Soni S., 2009. Biodiversity of fish fauna of Surha Tal, Ballia District (U.P.), India. Flora and Fauna (Jhansi) 25: 87-90.
  36. Srivastava P.K., Srivastava S.J., 2009. Checklist of fish species richness of Jal Prakash Narayan Bird Sanctuary, Suraha Lake, Ballia, U.P., India. Our Nature 7: 207-222.
  37. Srivastava P.K., Srivastava S.J., 2012a. Preliminary observations on Avifauna of the Jai Prakash Narayan Bird Sanctuary (Suraha Tal Lake), Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 47: 2727-2732.
  38. Srivastava P.K., Srivastava S.J., 2012b. Indigenous fishing gears in Suraha Lake, Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Wetlands Ecology 5: 73-78.
  39. Stanley T.D., 2002. Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25: 232-250.
  40. Swarup K., Singh S.R., 1975. The fisheries of Suraha Tal, Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Zoological Society of India 75: 280-284.
  41. Venkatachalam L., Jayanthi M., 2016. Estimating the economic value of ecosystem services of Pallikaranai Marsh in Chennai City: A contingent valuation approach. MIDS Working Paper No. 220.
  42. Voa Q.T., Kuenzerb C., Voc Q., Moderd F., Oppelte N., 2012. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 23: 432-446.
  43. Wattage P., 2012. Valuation of ecosystem services in coastal ecosystems: Asian and European perspectives. Ecosystem Services Economics (ESE), Working Paper Series 8: 2-27.