Keywords
environmental protection
public organisations
institutions
sustainability need awareness
Poland
How to Cite
Abstract
The quality of public organisations, which is highly dependent on the institutional quality, is one of the fundamental factors determining policy effectiveness and socio-economic growth trajectories in a long-term perspective. The article provides an insight into the topic of the informal institutions characterising Polish public organisations by paying special attention to informal institutions referring to the awareness of the need for sustainability and an attitude towards Cohesion Policy implementation in the field of environmental protection. Therefore, the main research goal was to verify the following hypothesis: “The staff of Polish public organisations are characterised by the awareness of the need for sustainability and a positive attitude towards Cohesion Policy implementation in the field of environmental protection”. To this end, a direct research technique (e-questionnaire) involving representatives of organisations responsible for Cohesion Policy implementation and for natural environment protection was applied. This made it possible to gather unique data and to elaborate the structure indicators describing the beliefs of staff employed in public organisations. Overall, their positive attitude towards the directions and assumptions of Cohesion Policy in the field of environmental protection was proved. The examined groups of organisations were characterised by a similar way of thinking about Cohesion Policy funds as an environmental protection factor, which seems to be an important institutional building block affecting Cohesion Policy effectiveness. Some of the respondents demonstrated critical thinking, and they developed their own ideas regarding the most important environmental protection factors including mainly both formal and informal institutional elements, such as legal regulations or ecological education.
Funding
This publication includes results of the re- search carried out as part of the project entitled ‘Significance of EU regional policy in shaping the environmental dimension of sustainable de- velopment in Poland’, financed by the National Science Centre (NCN 2016/21/N/HS4/00075).
References
Aiello V., Reverberi P.M., Brasili C., 2019. European identity and citizens’ support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach. Regional Science Policy and Practice 11(4): 673–693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12242
Aykac B., Metin H., 2012. The future of public organizations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 468–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.077
Babbie E., 2004. Badania społeczne w praktyce (Social research in practice). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.
Bachtler J., Mendez C., Oraže H., 2014. From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies 22(4): 735–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
Bachtrögler J., Fratesi U., Perucca G., 2020. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies 54(1): 21–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615
Bartniczak B., 2010. Zagraniczna pomoc ekologiczna jako przykład międzynarodowej współpracy w dziedzinie ochrony środowiska (Foreign ecological aid as an example of international co-operation in the field of environmental protection). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia 7(132): 11–20.
Becker P., 2019. The reform of European Cohesion Policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration 41(2): 147–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964
Boin A., Christensen T., 2008. The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership. Administration and Society 40(3): 271–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707313700
Boyne G.A., Meier J.M., O’Toole L. Jr., Walker R.M., 2005. Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui037
Capello R., Perucca G., 2018. Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: The role of the local context. Regional Studies 52(11): 1451–1463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1397273
Casson M.C., Giusta M.D., Kambhampati U.S., 2010. Formal and informal institutions and development. World Development 38(2): 137–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008
Chaumba J., 2013. The use and value of mixed methods research in social work. Advances in Social Work 14(2): 307–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/1858
Churski P., 2008. Czynniki rozwoju regionalnego i polityka regionalna w Polsce w okresie integracji z Unią Europejską (Factors of regional development and regional policy in Poland in the period of integration with the European Union). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
Churski P., Perdał R., 2016. Where do Cohesion Policy funds flow and do they have any impact? The Polish lesson. Barometr Regionalny 14(3): 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.489
Cichocki P., 2011. Polish attitudes towards the European Union. Przegląd Zachodni 3: 265–277.
Conyers D., 1983. Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration? Public Administration and Development 3(2): 97–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230030202
Crescenzi R., Giua M., 2020. One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies 54(1): 10–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174
Czyż T., 2016. Metoda wskaźnikowa w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej (The concept of indicator in socio-economic geography). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 34: 9–19.
Dąbrowski M., Spaans M., Fernandez-Maldonado A.M., Rocco R., 2021. Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: The role of communication and implementation. European Planning Studies 29(5): 827–843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413
Faludi A., Peyrony J., 2011. Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion – Future scenarios. European Journal of Spatial Development 9(2): 2–21.
Farole T., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2011. Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(5): 1089–1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x
Fiedor B., 2015. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne w kształtowaniu trwałego rozwoju (Formal and informal institutions in shaping sustainable development). Studia i Prace WNEiZ US (Studies and research of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the University of Szczecin) 40(2): 83–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/sip.2015.40/2-07
Fratesi U., Wishlade F.G., 2017. The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies 51(6): 817–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
Gruszewska E., 2017. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne. Skutki antynomii (Formal and informal institutions. Results of antinomy). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 493: 36–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.493.03
Hawrysz L., Foltys J., 2016. Environmental aspects of social responsibility of public sector organizations. Sustainability 8(1): 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010019
Herodowicz T., 2016. Interwencja środowiskowa polityki spójności w Polsce – merytoryczne ukierunkowanie i regionalne zróżnicowanie (Environmental intervention of cohesion policy in Poland – the substantive orientation and regional diversity). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 33: 95–116.
Herodowicz T., 2020. Znaczenie polityki regionalnej Unii Europejskiej w kształtowaniu środowiskowego wymiaru rozwoju zrównoważonego w Polsce (The importance of the European Union regional policy in shaping the environmental dimension of sustainable development in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
Hooghe L., 1996. Introduction: Reconciling EU-wide policy and national diversity. In: Hooghe L. (ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–24.
Hooghe L., Marks G., 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302786
Iacovino N.M., Barsanti S., Cinquini L., 2017. Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: The case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review 17: 61–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x
Komornicki T., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Degórska B., Goch K., Śleszyński P., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Siłka P., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. EUROPA XXI 35: 69–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.5
Maciejewska-Mieszkowska K., 2017. Stosunek Polaków do Unii Europejskiej a ich udział w wyborach do parlamentu europejskiego (The attitude of Poles towards the European Union and their participation in the elections to the European Parliament). Studia Wyborcze 24: 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26485/SW/2017/24/1
Medeiros E., 2014. Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies 22(9): 1960–1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.813910
Medeiros E., 2017. European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: A territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies 51(8): 1259–1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719
Niczyporuk J., 2009. Sfera publiczna (Public sphere). In: Blicharz J., Boć J. (eds), Prawna działalność instytucji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego (Legal activities of civil society institutions). Kolonia Ltd., Wrocław: 119–124.
North D.C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Quality of Government Institute, 2010. Measuring the quality of government and subnational variation. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Online: https://nicholascharron.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/final-report-parts-1-3.pdf (accessed 2 November 2022).
Rodríguez-Pose A., 2013. Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies 47(7): 1034–1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
Rodríguez-Pose A., Garcilazo E., 2015. Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies 49(8): 1274–1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
Romanelli M., 2017. Rethinking public organizations as knowledge-oriented and technology-driven organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy 5(4): 559–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/5.4.06
Shorten A., Smith J., 2017. Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing 20: 74–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699
Stachowiak K., Stryjakiewicz T., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae 27B(1): 7–2.
Surubaru N.C., 2017. Administrative and political embeddedness: How to improve the institutional environments dealing with the management and implementation of EU Structural and Investment Funds? The experience of new member states. In: Bachtler J., Berkowitz P., Hardy S., Muravska T. (eds), EU Cohesion Policy Reassessing performance and direction. Routledge, London and New York: 171–185.
Syssoeva N.M., 2010. Institutional problems of regional development in Russia. Quaestiones Geographicae 29(2): 19–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-010-0011-8
Wæraas A., Byrkjeflot H., 2012. Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal 15(2): 186–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.702590
Wytrążek W., 2011. Podstawowe pojęcia teorii organizacji i zarządzania w instytucjach publicznych (The main terms of organisation and management in public institutions). In: Kawalec P., Wodzisz R., Lipski P. (eds), Podstawy naukoznawstwa, t. 2 (Fundamentals of science, vol. 2). Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin: 315–337.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TOMASZ HERODOWICZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.