Abstract
Older adults have a long-time perspective when it comes to the perception of changes in local climate and are uniquely vulnerable to these developments in terms of health. The discussed in-depth, qualitative study is based on interviews with people from the age group over 65 years (N = 10; five females), who live in different regions of Poland, concerning their views on climate change and its mitigation. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to create a map of their observations and attitudes. Results indicate the importance of perceiving climate change in specific and local categories as well as show frequent identification of this issue with traditional environmentalism focussed on pollution and littering. This foregrounds difficulties in understanding invisible greenhouse gases and how they work. In terms of mitigation, the study has revealed little faith in climate action undertaken by fellow citizens and the government, as well as a sense of limited agency, which is also disproportionally projected onto children and young adults. However, through everyday observations, older adults appear to be profoundly aware of how climate change impacts the environment. Contrary to stereotypes, they also declare high emotional engagement in this issue. Consequently, despite being overlooked with respect to this subject, older adults can play an important role in promoting climate awareness and climate-friendly policies.
Funding
This work was supported by the Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, from the funds awarded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in the form of a subsidy for the maintenance and development of research potential in 2023 r (501-D125-01-1250000 zlec 5011000229).
References
Amel E., Manning C., Scott B., Koger S., 2017. Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356(6335): 275-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1931
Ayalon L., Senjooti R., Omer A., Norah K., 2023. A scoping review of research on older people and intergenerational relations in the context of climate change. The Gerontologist 63(5): 945-958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac028
Ballew M., Marlon J.S., Rosenthal S., Gustafson A., Kotcher J., Maibach E., Leiserowitz A., 2019. “Do Younger Generations Care More about Global Warming? Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.” Online: climateaccess.org/resource/do-younger-generations-care-more-about-global-warming (accessed 15 February 2024).
Bieńkowska Z., Drygas P., Sadura P., 2021. Nie nasza wina, nie nasz problem. Katastrofa klimatyczna w oczach Polek i Polaków podczas pandemii, Warszawa: Fundacja im. Heinricha Bölla.
Braun V., Clarke V., 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Budziszewska M., Kałwak M., 2022. Climate depression. Critical analysis of the concept. Psychiatria Polska 56(1): 171-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/127900
Byrka K., Wójcik A., 2016. Jak promować politykę prośrodowiskową i energetykę odnawialną w Polsce (Raport o docieraniu z przekazem do grupy docelowej life_wzrost_pl). Online: energiaodnowa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2-Raport-o-docieraniu-z-przekazem-do-grupy-docelowej.pdf (accessed 15 February 2024).
Carstensen L.L., Fung H.H., Charles S.T., 2003. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion 27(2): 103-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
CBOS. 2018. Polacy wobec zmian klimatu, Warszawa 2018. Online: www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2018/K_158_18.PDF (accessed 28 June 2023).
Dabla-Norris E., Helbling T., Khalid S., Khan H., Magistretti G., Sollaci A., Srinivasan K., 2023. Public perceptions of climate mitigation policies: Evidence from cross-country surveys. 2023(002). Online: www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2023/02/07/Public-Perceptions-of-Climate-Mitigation-Policies-Evidence-from-Cross-Country-Surveys-528057 (accessed 15 February 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400229756.006
Gifford R., 2011. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. The American Psychologist 66(4): 290-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Glenn A., 2011. Chronic environmental change: Emerging ‘psychoterratic’ syndromes. In: International and cultural psychology. Springer New York, New York, NY: 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3
Griffin L., 2018. Wisdom from the past, hope and fear for the future: An exploration of older age adults coping with the threat of climate change. search.proquest.com. Online: search.proquest.com/openview/904ce896c928891ce39b3ced372fa473/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750 (accessed 15 February 2024).
Haq G., 2010. Older people and climate change: The case for better engagement. Online: policycommons.net/artifacts/1359620/older-people-and-climate-change/1972856/ (accessed 28 June 2023).
Kantar (2019) Raport “Ziemianie Atakują” Online: odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ziemianie-atakuja.pdf (accessed 15 February 2024).
Kahn P.H., 2000. The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Choice 37(05): 37-3059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.37-3059
Kemkes R.J., Akerman S., 2019. Contending with the nature of climate change: Phenomenological interpretations from northern Wisconsin. Emotion, Space and Society 33(2019): 100614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100614
Kundzewicz Z., Matczak P., 2012. Climate change regional review: Poland. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change 3(4): 297-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.175
Lamb W.F., Mattioli G., Levi S., Roberts J.T., Capstick S., Creutzig F., Steinberger J.K., 2020. Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability 3(17): 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
Majchrowicz M., 2021. Postrzeganie zmiany klimatu z perspektywy osób po 65 roku życia, Interpretacyjna Analiza Fenomenologiczna. MS.
Milfont T.L., Zubielevitch E., Milojev P, Sibley C.G., 2021. Ten-year panel data confirm generation gap but climate beliefs increase at similar rates across ages. Nature Communications 12(1): 4038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24245-y
Norgaard, K.M., 2011. Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press, London, England. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015448.001.0001
Old People Don’t Care, 2016. Online: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FpihogHAQMs (accessed 28 June 2023).
Pietkiewicz I., Smith J., 2014. A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal 20(1): 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
Swim J., Clayton S., Doherty T., Gifford R., Howard G., Reser J., Stern P., Weber E., 2009. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-Faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. A Report by the American Psychological Association’s Task Force on the Interface between Psychology and Global Climate Change. American Psychological Association, Washington. Online: www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.pdf (accessed 15 February 2024).
Trope Y., Liberman N., 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117(2): 440-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Weber E., 2010. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change 1(3): 332-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
Weintrobe S., 2013. The difficult problem of anxiety in thinking about climate change. In: Engaging with climate change: Psychoanalytic and interdisciplinary perspectives. 33-47. UK: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094402
Wójcik A., 2023. Postawy wobec zmiany klimatu w Polsce. In: Budziszewska M., Kardaś A., Bohdanowicz B. (eds), Klimatyczne ABC. Interdyscyplinarne podstawy współczesnej wiedzy o zmianie klimatu. Wydanie 2. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa. 106-111.
Wójcik A.D., Jurgiel D., Strzałkowski M., in press. Disruption to end the destruction – Support for the circular economy within and against the economic system. In: Glińska Neweś A., Ulkuniemi P. (eds), The human dimension of the circular economy. Reframing the Mindset at Macro, Organizational and Individual Levels. Elgar. 284-303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035314225.00024
Worek B., Kocór M., Micek D., Lisek K., Szczucka A., 2021. Społeczny wymiar rozwoju energetyki rozproszonej w Polsce – kluczowe czynniki i wyzwania. Energetyka Rozproszona 5-6: 105-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7494/er.2021.5-6.105
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Magdalena Budziszewska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.