Female-based urban poverty in parts of Sehore city, India
PDF

Keywords

urban poverty
female-based urban poverty
urban poverty modelling
Sehore city
analytical hierarchy process

How to Cite

Siddiqui, F., & Parveen, S. (2024). Female-based urban poverty in parts of Sehore city, India. Quaestiones Geographicae, 43(2), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0017

Abstract

Female-based urban poverty has been a widely researched topic fitting into the pursuit of gender equality since the Beijing 1995 Conference for Women. However, the criteria for measuring female-based urban poverty assume a direct role in reducing various urban poverty manifestations amongst females. Nevertheless, standard domains such as economic and educational statuses show some noticeable characteristics in smaller townships located in the low-urbanised states of India. The city under concern—Sehore Municipal Council (M.C. hereafter)—furnishes an example of an emerging urban area in a low-urbanised state of Madhya Pradesh (27.6% of the urban population compared to the national average of 31.16%) where domain-wise spatial manifestations of female-based urban poverty are noticeable. In addition to the financial aspect of urban poverty, the study attempts to identify local area determinants related to the socio-economic and the cultural environment of Sehore M.C., using standard variables and indicators for the spatial manifestation of female-based urban poverty through a GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making technique of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Female-based urban poverty in Sehore M.C., lying within the urban sphere of influence of two metro cities of Bhopal and Indore, is analysed across six domains of economic, educational, social, health, lack of decision-making and time poverty, for 17 selected localities across four wards. Out of the six selected domains, the economic poverty domain turns out to be the strongest, while time poverty is the least dominant. The present model of female-based urban poverty may apply to similar newly urbanising areas falling within the ambit of metro cities in India.

https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0017
PDF

References

Aguilar G.R., 2015. An exploration of the multidimensional poverty of women at household and individual level. The case of Ethiopia 2011. OPHI.

Alkire S., Oldiges C., Kanagaratnam V., 2020. Multidimensional poverty reduction in India 2005/6-2015/16: Still a long way to go but the poorest are catching up. Oxford Poverty and Human Initiative (OPHI) 54b: 1-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105454

Alkire, S., Robles G., 2015. Poverty maps: Mapping multidimensional poverty so policies can fight it efficiently. OPHI Briefing 37.

Alkire S., Santos M.E., 2010. Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. OPHI working paper 38, Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1815243

Angemi D., 2011. Measuring household vulnerability in the context of poverty education: Evidence from Uganda. Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano Development Studies Working Paper 317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992535

Baker J., 2004. Analyzing urban poverty: A summary of methods and approaches 3399. World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3399

Beijing Conference on Women, 1995. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Fourth%20World%20Conference%20on%20Women%20in%20Beijing%2C%20China%20was,legal%20advances%20aimed%20at%20securing

Betti G., Ferretti C., Gagliardi F., Lemmi A., Verma V., 2009. Proposal for new multidimensional and fuzzy measures of poverty and inequality at national and regional level 83. Working Paper.

Bradshaw S., 2002. Gendered poverties and power relations: looking inside communities and households. Puntos de Encuentro, Nicaragua.

Bradshaw S., Chant S., Linneker B., 2017. Gender and poverty: What we know, don’t know, and need to know for Agenda 2030. Gender, Place & Culture 24(12): 1667-1688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1395821

Bradshaw S., Chant S., Linneker B., 2019. Challenges and changes in gendered poverty: The feminization, de-feminization, and re-feminization of poverty in Latin America. Feminist Economics 25(1): 119-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2018.1529417

Cagatay N., 1998. Gender and poverty. UNDP, Social Development and Poverty Elimination Division, New York.

Census of India, 2011. Provisional population totals. New Delhi: Government of India: 409-413.

CGIAR Gender Platform, 2021. Summary Report 2020-2021. Online: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/21b8e72b-fb7e-45d4-ae26-57a966cab7ae/content (accessed 23 March 2024)

Chant S., 2013. Cities through a “gender lens”: A golden “urban age” for women in the global South? Environment and Urbanization 25(1): 9-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813477809

Chant S., 2016. Women, girls, and world poverty: Empowerment, equality or essentialism? International Development Planning Review 38(1): 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2016.1

Chatterjee E., Desai S., Vanneman R., 2018. Indian paradox: Rising education, declining womens’ employment. Demographic Research 38: 855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.31

Chaudhary R., Verick S., 2014. Female labour force participation in India and beyond. ILO, New Delhi: 1-32.

Davidson P.M., DiGiacomo M., McGrath S.J., 2011. The feminization of aging: How will this impact on health outcomes and services? Health Care for Women International 32(12): 1031-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.610539

Durbin E., 1999. Towards a gendered human poverty measure. Feminist Economics 5(2): 105-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135457099338003

Gordon D., 2005. Indicators of poverty & hunger. In: Expert group meeting on youth development indicators 1(1): 12-14. United Nations Headquarters, New York.

Hyde E., Greene M.E., Darmstadt G.L., 2020. Time poverty: Obstacle to women’s human rights, health and sustainable development. Journal of Global Health 10(2): 020313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.020313

IIPS (Indian Institute of Population Studies), ICF, 2017. India national family health survey NFHS-4 2015-16. Mumbai: IIPS and ICF: 1255-1259.

IIPS (Indian Institute of Population Studies), ICF, 2021. National family health survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India. National Family Health Survey, India.

Kapsos S., Silbermann A., Bourmpoula E., 2014. Why is female labour force participation declining so sharply in India? ILO, Geneva: 1-51.

Klasen S., Pieters J., 2015. What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India? The World Bank Economic Review 29(3): 449-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv003

Kumar R., Pathinathan T., 2015. Sieving out the poor using fuzzy decision-making tools. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 8(22): 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i22/79161

Lahoti R., Swaminathan H., 2016. Economic development and women’s labor force participation in India. Feminist Economics 22(2): 168-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1066022

Larson E.L., 1996. United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for equality, development, and peace (Beijing, China: September 1995). Emory International Law Review 10: 695.

Lawson S., 2008. Women hold up half the sky. Goldman Sachs Global Economic Working Paper 164. Online: http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/investing-in-women/bios-pdfs/women-half-sky-pdf.pdf (accessed 15 September 2017).

Lemanski C., Marx C., Chant S., Datu K., 2015. Women in cities: Prosperity or poverty? A need for multi-dimensional and multi-spatial analysis. The city in urban poverty: 39-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367433_3

Louis-Weinstein F.S., 2019. Women’s empowerment as a policy for poverty reduction in Haiti. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University.

Marois G., Zhelenkova E., Ali B., 2022. Labour force projections in India until 2060 and implications for the demographic dividend. Social Indicators Research 164(1): 477-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02968-9

Montoya Á.J.A., Teixeira K.M.D., 2017. Multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: Are female-headed households better off? Social Indicators Research 132(3): 1037-1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1345-y

NFHS-5 (National Family Health Survey-5), 2019-2020. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Online: https://rchiips.org/nfhs/Factsheet_Compendium_NFHS-5.shtml (accessed 24 March 24).

O’Neil T., Domingo P., 2015. The power to decide: Women, decision-making and gender equality. Overseas Development Institute Report. Online: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/9848.pdf (accessed 24 March 2024).

Oxaal Z., Cook S., 1998. Health and poverty gender analysis. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.

Parveen S., Siddiqui F., 2020. Spatial regularity in the distribution of female population and female workers: A study of Sehore Municipal Council, Madhya Pradesh (India). GeoJournal 85: 731-745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-09989-x

Pearce D., 1978. The feminization of poverty: Women, work and welfare. Urban and Social Change Review 11(1-2): 28-36.

Rubio C., Rubio M.C., Abraham E., 2018. Poverty assessment in degraded rural drylands in the Monte Desert, Argentina. An evaluation using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Social Indicators Research 137: 579-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1606-4

Saaty T., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. In: Kobe, Japan 1: 69.

Sen G., Grown C., 2013. Development crises and alternative visions: Third world women’s perspectives. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070179

Sulaiman J., Azman A., Khan Z., 2014. Re-modeling urban poverty: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice 2(2): 64-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ijrh.2014.020209

Townsend P., 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520325760

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2009. Human Development Report 2009. UNDP, New York. Online: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/human-development-report-2009-english.human-development-report-2009-english (accessed 24 March 2024).

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2010. Human Development Report 2010. UNDP, New York. Online: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/human-development-report-2010-complete-english.human-development-report-2010-complete-english (accessed 24 March 2024).

UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund), 1994. Women empowerment. Retrieved from https://www.unfpa.org/resources/issue-7-women-empowerment (accessed 24 March 2024)

UNIFEM (United Nations Development Fund for Women), 2005. The progress of the world’s women: Women, work & poverty. Online: https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Media/Publications/UNIFEM/PoWW2005_eng.pdf (accessed 24 March 2024).

URDPFI (Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation), 2014. Guideline, Vol. 1. Ministry of Urban Development Government of India.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development), 2023. 2023 Gender equality and women’s empowerment policy. Online: https://www.usaid.gov/document/2023-gender-equality-and-womens-empowerment-policy (accessed 24 March 2024).

Verick S., 2014. Female labor force participation in developing countries. IZA World of Labor. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.87

Zahra K., Zafar T., 2015. Marginality as a root cause of poverty: A case of Punjab. The Pakistan Development Review 54(4): 629-648.