Keywords
inner peripheries
functional urban areas
SARS-CoV-2
European Union
Poland
How to Cite
Abstract
The EU’s cohesion policy is a fundamental component of intervention policies in united Europe. Its primary goal is to reduce the scale of spatial differences in development by striving to improve economic, social, and territorial cohesion. The outcomes of the actions implemented to date have been unsatisfactory. This underperformance is the basis for the ongoing discussion in Europe about the future paradigm of post-2027 cohesion policy. This article systematises the challenges and proposes recommendations concerning the actions of EU cohesion policy that should be considered in the new paradigm of this public intervention, enhancing its effectiveness and efficiency during a period of strong pressure from external development shocks, especially in less-developed areas such as inner peripheries. Its unique value is constructed on two fundamental factors. Firstly, the presented results are the outcome of qualitative field research, providing unique empirically factual material. Secondly, they concern the processes occurring in relation to the territories of the member state that is the largest beneficiary of EU cohesion policy, Poland, which is often regarded as a specific laboratory for cohesion policy.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Science Centre in Poland under the project ‘The trajectories and challenges of the development of inner peripheries in the new conditions of cohesion post SARS-CoV-2’ no. 2020/37/B/HS4/01034 (http://tiperico.web.amu.edu.pl/en/). The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on earlier versions of the article.
References
Alibašić H., Casula M., 2023. Navigating collaborative governance in Florida: An analysis of local governments resilience amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2890
Angelopoulos S., Silva A., Navon Y., Sinclair S., Yanotti M., 2023. Economic resilience in a pandemic: Did COVID-19 policy effects override industry diversity impacts in Australia? Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 42(2): 153-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12384
Artelaris P., Mavrommatis G., 2022. Territorial cohesion, the COVID-19 crisis and the urban paradox: Future challenges in urbanization and economic agglomeration. Region: the journal of ERSA 9(1): 135-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i1.403
Auzina-Emsina A., Ozolina V., 2022. Two-speed or three-speed recovery in post-COVID era: Regional and sectoral development. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2022.861
Ballantyne P., Singleton A., Dolega L., Macdonald J., 2023. Integrating the who, what, and where of US retail center geographies. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113(2): 488-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2098087
Barca F., 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Online: migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2010-12/docl_17396_240404999.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52(1): 134-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
Bartik T.J., 2020. Using place-based jobs policies to help distressed communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives 34(3): 99-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.99
Bartik A.W., Bertrand M., Cullen Z., Glaeser E.L., Muca M., 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. PNAS 117(30): 17656-17666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117
Boschma R., 2015. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies 49(5): 733-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
Brada J., Gajewski P., Kutan A.M., 2021. Economic resiliency and recovery, lessons from the financial crisis for the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis 74: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101658
Brakman S., Garretsen H., Van Marrewijk C., 2015. Regional resilience across Europe: On urbanization and the initial impact of the great recession. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 8(2): 225-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv005
Camagni R., 2008. Regional competitiveness: Towards a concept of territorial capital. In: Capello R., Camagni R., Chizzolini B., Fratesi U. (eds), Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe: European competitiveness and global strategies. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 33-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3
Capello R., Caragli A., Fratesi U., 2015. Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: Are cities sources of regional resilience? Journal of Economic Geography 15(5): 951-972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu053
Cerasoli M., Amato C., Ravagnan C., 2022. An antifragile strategy for Rome post-COVID mobility. Transportation Research Procedia 60: 338-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.044
Churski P., Adamiak C., Szyda B., Dubownik A., Pietrzykowski M., Śleszyński P., 2023. Nowa delimitacja miejskich obszarów funkcjonalnych w Polsce i jej zastosowanie w praktyce zintegrowanego podejścia terytorialnego (place-based approach) (A new delimitation of Functional Urban Areas in Poland and its application in the practice of the place-based approach), Przegląd Geograficzny 95(1): 29-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2023.1.2
Churski P., Adamiak C., Dubownik A., Komornicki T., Pietrzykowski M., Szyda B., Śleszyński P., 2024. The changing role of functional urban areas in regional policy: New challenges for place-based policy. 01/2024 – Working Paper of TIPERICO Project. Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań. Online: https://tiperico.web.amu.edu.pl/pl/publikacje/79-the-changing-role-of-functional-urban-areas-in-regional-policy-new-challenges-for-place-based-policy (accessed 12 June 2024).
Copus A., Mantino F., Noguera J., 2017. Inner peripheries: An oxymoron or a real challenge for territorial cohesion? Italian Journal of Planning Practice 7(1): 24-49.
Cotella G., Vitale Brovarone E., 2020. Questioning urbanisation models in the face of COVID-19. TeMA. Journal of Land Use. Mobility and Environment. Special Issue 105-118.
Davenport A., Zaranko B., 2020. Levelling up: Where and how? London. Online: https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/CH7-IFS-Green-Budget-2020-Levelling-up.pdf (accessed 13 June 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/ex.ifs.2024.0067
Diemer A., Iammarino S., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2022. The regional development trap in Europe. Economic Geography 98(5): 487-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655
Dijkstra L., Poelman H., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2020. The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies 54(6): 737-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
Dzigbede K., Gehl S., Willoughby K., 2020. Disaster resiliency of US local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review 80(4): 634-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13249
European Commission: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. The future of social protection and of the welfare state in the EU, 2023. Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. Forging a sustainable future together – Cohesion for a competitive and inclusive Europe – Report of the High-Level Group on the Future of Cohesion Policy, February 2024. Publications Office of the European Union.
Farole T., Goga S., Ionescu-Heroiu M., 2018. Rethinking lagging regions: Using cohesion policy to deliver on the potential of Europe’s regions. World Bank Report on The European Union. Washington. Online: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/739811525697535701-0080022018/original/RLRFULLonline20180501.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
Floerkemeier M.H., Spatafora M.N., Venables A., 2021. Regional disparities, growth, and inclusiveness. IMF Working Papers3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3799630
Friedman T.L., 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Fritsch M., Kahila P., Nemeth S., Scott J., W. (eds), 2023. Spatial justice and cohesion. The role of place-based action in community development (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229681-1
Giannakis E., Bruggeman A., 2020. Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban-rural divide. Regional Studies 54(9): 1200-1213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720
Hadjimichalis C., 2021. An uncertain future for the post-Brexit, post-COVID-19 European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies 28(1): 8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420968961
Harvey D., 2005. Space of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.
Hertrich T.J., Brenner T., 2024. When the past becomes the future: The problem of policies in ‘left behind’ places. No. 02.24. Working Papers on Innovation and Space. Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Iammarino S., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2019. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography 19(2): 273-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby021
Jagódka M., Snarska M., 2022. Should we continue EU cohesion policy? The dilemma of uneven development of Polish regions. Social Indicators Research 165: 901-917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03048-8
Kang W., Wang Q., 2021. What are the impacts of COVID-19 on small businesses in the U.S.? Early evidence based on the largest 50 MSAs. Geographical Review 111(4): 528-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1927731
Kang W., Wang Q., 2023. The impact of COVID-19 on small businesses in the US: A longitudinal study from a regional perspective. International Regional Science Review 46(3): 235-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176221132230
Kilmer M.E., Horesh L., Avron H., Newman E., 2021. Tensor-tensor algebra for optimal representation and compression of multiway data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(28): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015851118
Kowalski T., 2024. Macroeconomic implications of the COVID-19 revisited. In: Mińska-Struzik E., Jankowska B. (eds), Is there any “new normal”? Economics of the turmoil. University of Economics and Business Press: Poznań 39-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-217-7/2
Lange B., Hülz M., Schmid B., Schulz C. (eds), 2021. Post-growth geographies. Spatial relations of diverse and alternative economies. Social and Cultural Geography. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839457337
Lee S., Park J., Cha S., Kim D., 2022. A regional economy’s resistance to the COVID-19 shock: Sales revenues of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises in South Korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 13(2): 190-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00402-9
Letta E., 2024. Much more than a market. Speed, security, solidarity. Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU Citizens. Institut Jacques Delors. Paris. Online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/ny3j24sm/much-more-than-a-market-report-by-enrico-letta.pdf (accessed 10 June 2024).
MacKinnon D., Kempton L., O’Brien P., Ormerod E., Pike A., Tomaney J., 2022. Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 15(1): 39-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
MacLeod G., Jones M., 2020. Explaining ‘Brexit capital’: Uneven development and the austerity state. In: Boyle M., Paddison R., Shirlow P. (eds), Brexit geographies. Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429281303-2
Marchigiani E., Bonfantini B., 2022. Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning. Questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-minute city. Sustainability 14(9): 5468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095468
Martin R., 2010. The local geographies of the financial crisis: From the housing bubble to economic recession and beyond. Journal of Economic Geography 11(4): 87-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq024
Martin R., 2011. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography 12(1): 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr019
Martin K., Lee K.E., Hall J.P., 2021. Public policy. Origins, practice, and analysis. Dahlonega, Georgia: University of North Georgia Press.
Martin R., Sunley P., 2020. Regional economic resilience: Evolution and evaluation. In: Bristow G., Healy A. (eds), Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience: Edward Elgar Publishing: 10-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785360862.00007
Martin R., Sunley P., Gardiner B., Tyler P., 2016. How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies 50(4): 561-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
Mattinson D., 2020. Beyond the Red Wall: Why Labour lost, how the Conservatives won and what will happen next? Biteback Publishing. London.
Mbah R.E., Wasum D.F., 2022. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A review of the economic impact of Russian-Ukraine crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 9(3): 144-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.93.12005
McCann P., 2008. Globalization and economic geography: The world is curved, not flat. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 1(3): 351-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn002
McCann P., 2023. How have place-based policies evolved to date and what are they for now? In: Background paper for the OECD-EC High-Level Expert Workshop Series on ‘Place-Based Policies for the Future’. Workshop 1: 14. Online: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/place-based-policies-for-the-future.htm (accessed 10 June 2024).
Milly D.J., 2023. Multilevel governance, community and emergency management during the pandemic: Migrants in Japan. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 43(3/4): 384-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2022-0172
Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion, 2020. Territorial agenda 2030. Online: http://www.bmi.bund.de (accessed 17 June 2024).
Moreno C., 2020. Droit de cité: De la ‘ville-monde’ à la ‘ville du quart d’heure’ (Freedom of the city: From the ‘world city’ to the ‘quarter-hour city’). Edition de l’Observatoire, Paris.
Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D., Gall C., Pratlong F., 2021. Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities 4: 93-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
Muro M., 2023. Biden’s big bet on place-based industrial policy. Brookings Institution. United States of America. Online: https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/2dh9ms on 25 Oct 2024 (accessed 13 July 2024).
Ninth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. March 2024. Regional and Urban Policy. European Commission. Luxembourg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information-sources/cohesion-report_en (accessed 15 May 2024).
OECD, 2020. The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of governments. OECD tackling coronavirus (COVID-19): Contributing to a global effort. Online: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-COVID-19-managing-the-crisis-across-levels-of-government-d3e314e1/ (accessed 17 June 2024).
OECD Regional Outlook, 2023. The longstanding geography of inequalities. OECD Publishing, Paris. Online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-regional-outlook-2023_92cd40a0-en.html (accessed 13 June 2024).
Pike A., Béal V., Cauchi-Duval N., Franklin R., Kinossian N., Lang T., Leiber T., MacKinnon D., Rousseau M., Royer J., Servillo L., Tomaney J., Velthuis S., 2023. ‘Left behind places’: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies 58(6): 1167-1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972
Pinheiro F.L., Balland P.-A., Boschma R., Hartmann D., 2022. The dark side of the geography of innovation: Relatedness, complexity and regional inequality in Europe. Regional Studies: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106362
Pinto F., Akhavan M., 2021. Scenarios for a post-pandemic city: Urban planning strategies and challenges of making “Milan 15-minutes city”. European Transport/ Trasporti Europei 85(12): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2021.85.12
Ray D.M., MacLachlan I., Lamarche R., Srinath K.P., 2017. Economic shock and regional resilience: Continuity and change in Canada’s regional employment structure, 1987-2012. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(4): 952-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16681788
Rocco R.K.F., Faludi A., 2022. Faludi blogging: Chasing territorialism: Short essays by Andreas Faludi. TU Delft Open Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34641/MG.41
Rodríguez-Pose A., Bartalucci F., Lozano-Gracia N., Davalos M., 2024. Overcoming left-behindedness. Moving beyond the efficiency versus equity debate in territorial development. Urban, Disaster Risk Management, Resilience and Land Global Practice & Poverty and Equity Global Practice. March 2024. Policy Research Working Paper 10734: Online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099224303262426681/pdf/IDU17dc414d91a08a142ad1a8da1e2c5bf4ade41.pdf (accessed 13 June 2024).
Rodríguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R., 2008. Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still maters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 1(3): 371-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn011
Rodríguez-Pose A., Dijkstra L., Poleman H., 2023. The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Working Papers. A series of short papers on regional research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy WP 03/2023. European Commission, European Union, Luxembourg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/reports/Geography_of_Discontent_and_development_trap_forlay-out.pdf (accessed 20 May 2024).
Sabirin A., Adiyaksa F.D., Herfian R.H., 2022. Perspective between central and regional government relations in legal problems to handle COVID-19 pandemic. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 3(2): 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i2.22040
Servillo L., Russo A.P., Barbera F., 2016. Inner peripheries: Towards an EU place-based agenda on territorial peripherality. Italian Journal of Planning Practice 6(1): 42-75.
Tomaney J., Pike A., Natarajan L., 2021. Land-use planning, inequality and the problem of ‘left-behind places’ – A ‘provocation’ for the UK2070 Commission. The UK2070 Papers. Online: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10125613/7/Natarajan_UK2070PapersSeries3_extracted.pdf (accessed 20 May 2024).
UNCDF, 2020. COVID-19 Emergency Response. Local Government Finance. Guidance Note for Immediate Action. Online: https://www.local2030.org/library/764/Local-Government-Finance-Guidance-Note-for-Immediate-Action.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
Zhai W., Liu M., Fu X., Peng Z.R., 2021. American inequality meets COVID-19: Uneven spread of the disease across communities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111(7): 2023-2043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1866489
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PAWEŁ CHURSKI, CZESŁAW ADAMIAK, ANNA DUBOWNIK, MACIEJ PIETRZYKOWSKI, BARBARA SZYDA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.