Exploring new barriers to the implementation of frugal innovation projects among Spanish NGDOs
Journal cover Quaestiones Geographicae, volume 44, no. 4, year 2025, title Quaestiones Geographicae
PDF

Keywords

frugal innovation
development cooperation
project implementation
project management
implementation difficulties
frugal innovation attributes
innovation diffusion
sustainable development

How to Cite

Delfa Rodríguez, B., Gomez, G. M., & Ballesteros, C. (2025). Exploring new barriers to the implementation of frugal innovation projects among Spanish NGDOs. Quaestiones Geographicae, 44(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2025-0041

Abstract

The concept of frugal innovation has attracted significant academic interest over the last decade, but its diffusion among non-governmental organisations (NGOs) with technology transfer programmes in the Global South has been insufficiently examined. This is despite the intuitive benefits these organisations could derive from simplicity, cost reduction and a human-centred approach related to frugal innovations. This research addresses that gap through a multiple-case study of innovation projects implemented by a Spanish NGO across three Latin American countries: Bolivia, Honduras, and Peru. The study first assesses the degree of frugality in these projects and subsequently focuses on the dissemination of frugal innovations, as well as the challenges encountered during project implementation in the field. Our findings indicate that core frugal attributes, such as simplicity and a human-centred approach, face fewer implementation hurdles and tend to facilitate project success. Nevertheless, the results reveal a mismatch between the envisioned ex ante frugality levels and those observed ex post in interviews with end-users and other agents after implementation. This research identifies the frugal innovation characteristics that contribute to improved project management and implementation success, as well as the implementation barriers that persist or emerge unexpectedly during the diffusion of frugal innovation. These include institutional misalignments, limited local ownership, and insufficient consideration of end-user practices.

https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2025-0041
PDF

References

Ayúdame3D, 2024. ¿Qué es Ayúdame3D? Online: https://ayudame3d.org/ (accessed 1 January 2024).

Basu R.R., Banerjee P.M., Sweeny E.G., 2013. Frugal innovation: Core competencies to address global sustainability. Journal of Management for Global sustainability 1(2): 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/2244-6893.1023

Berrueta V.M., Serrano-Medrano M., García-Bustamante C., Astier M., Masera O.R., 2017. Promoting sustainable local development of rural communities and mitigating climate change: The case of Mexico’s Patsari improved cookstove project. Climatic Change 140(1): 63-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1523-y

Bhaduri S., Sinha K.M., Knorringa P., 2018. Frugality and cross-sectoral policymaking for food security. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 84: 72-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.08.002

Bhatti Y.A., 2012. What is frugal, what is innovation? Towards a theory of frugal innovation (working paper). SSRN, Said Business School, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005910

Bhatti Y.A., Ventresca M., 2013. How can “frugal innovation” be conceptualized? (working paper). SSRN, Said Business School, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203552

Coccia M., 2023. New perspectives in innovation failure analysis: a taxonomy of general errors and strategic management for reducing risks. Technology in Society 75: 102384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102384

Creswell J.W., Poth C.N., 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications.

Douthwaite B., Keatinge J.D.H., Park J.R., 2001. Why promising technologies fail: The neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy 30(5): 819-836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00124-4

European Commission, 2004. Líneas directrices de gestión del ciclo del proyecto (Guidelines for Project Cycle Management). EuropeAid Cooperation Office, Brussels.

Fahrudi A.N., 2020. Alleviating poverty through social innovation. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal 14(1): 71-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.7

Fowler A., 2000. NGO futures: Beyond aid: NGDO values and the fourth position. Third World Quarterly 21(4): 589-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713701065

Fuertes-Fuertes I., Maset-Llaudes A., 2007. Las ONGD españolas: Retos en su actuación. Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación 20: 41-54.

Gaye M., Diallo F., 1997. Community participation in the management of the urban environment in Rufisque (Senegal). Environment and Urbanization 9(1): 9-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789700900110

Hägerstrand T., 1967. Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (Original work published in 1953 in Swedish).

Hancock B., Weaver A., Algar L., 2003. Qualitative research: Quality assurance briefing papers. Trent Focus Group. Nottingham, UK.

Hossain M., 2018. Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 182: 926-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.091

Jain S., Bhaduri S., 2021. The many facets of frugality: Insights from a quasi-comprehensive literature survey. Journal of Scientometric Research 10(2): 265-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.10.2.41

Kapoor R., Dwivedi Y.K., Piercy N.F., 2014. Innovation adoption attributes: A review and synthesis of research. European Journal of Innovation Management 18(3): 327-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2012-0083

Laprie J.C., 1995. Dependable computing and fault tolerance: Concepts and terminology. In: Siewiorek D.P. (ed.), Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing — Highlights from Twenty-Five Years. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA: 2-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCSH.1995.532603

Le Bas C., 2017. Sustainable innovation and frugal innovation: Exploring the relationships between innovation and sustainability. Revue d’économie industrielle 159: 113-137 (Open Edition). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.6617

Levänen J., Lindeman S., Baldassarre B., Kuvaja K., 2015. Frugal innovation and sustainable development – A case study in Kenyan agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 59-69.

McMurray A.J., Rim A., Michael N., 2019. The risk of frugal innovation: A management perspective. Journal of Risk Research 22(4): 484-500.

Meagher K., 2018. Cannibalizing the informal economy: Frugal innovation and economic inclusion in Africa. The European Journal of Development Research 30(1): 17-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4

Meyer S.G., 2007. La cooperación española para el desarrollo: ¿Aspiraciones hechas realidad? FRIDE (Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior).

Opola F.O., Klerkx L., Leeuwis C., Kilelu C.W., 2021. The hybridity of inclusive innovation narratives between theory and practice: A framing analysis. The European Journal of Development Research 33(3): 626-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00290-z

Oturakci M., 2020. A new approach to Rogers’ innovation diffusion theory: Critical and future perspectives. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: A Administration and Management 20(3): 17-25.

Pansera M., 2018. Frugal or fair? The unfulfilled promises of frugal innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review 8(4): 6-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1148

Pansera M., Martinez F., 2017. Innovation for development and poverty reduction: An integrative literature review. Journal of Management Development 36(1): 2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0013

Rao B.C., 2013. How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society 35(1): 65-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.003

Rao B.C., 2018. Science is indispensable to frugal innovations. Technology Innovation Management Review 8(4): 49-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1152

Rogers E.M., 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York.

Rogers E.M., 2003. Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, Tampa, FL.

Social Solver – ingeniería para un mundo más justo. (2025). Ennomotive. Online: https://www.ennomotive.com/social-solver-ecosystem/ (accessed 21 October 2025).

Sorensen I.M., McBean E.A., 2015. Beyond appropriate technology: Social considerations for the sustainable use of arsenic-iron removal plants in rural Bangladesh. Technology in Society 41: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.10.003

Tiwari R., Kalogerakis K., 2016. A bibliometric analysis of academic papers on frugal innovation (Working Paper 93). Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management (TIM), Hamburg.

Vellema S., Schouten G., Knorringa P., 2023. Connecting the concepts of frugality and inclusion to appraise business practices in systems of food provisioning: A Kenyan case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 36(3): 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-023-09913-x

Weyrauch T., Herstatt C., 2017. What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation 2(1): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y

Williams L.D., 2013. Three models of development: Community ophthalmology NGOs and the appropriate technology movement. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 12(4): 449-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341267