PERCEPTION OF MARGINALITY AND PERIPHERALITY IN AN IRISH RURAL CONTEXT

Main Article Content

Lucia Máliková
Maura Farrell
John McDonagh

Abstract

The existence of marginal regions is closely linked to the socio-spatial polarisation of our society. Although marginality and peripherality can be considered a multidimensional phenomenon, the literature as well as social discourses often address only some of its dimensions, in particular on the basis of objective approaches. Such a research is usually based on the quantification of a wide range of statistical indicators, whether of a social, environmental or economic nature. This study aims to capture another equally important dimension of this phenomenon, namely the perception of marginality and peripherality. Drawing on a series of interviews carried out with experts in the field of Irish rurality, this research points to the various perceptions of this phenomenon in rural Ireland. The results once again confirm the complexity of marginality and peripherality, and highlight many differences but also similarities that exist with regard to this phenomenon in the Irish rural context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Máliková, L., Farrell, M., & McDonagh, J. (2016). PERCEPTION OF MARGINALITY AND PERIPHERALITY IN AN IRISH RURAL CONTEXT. Quaestiones Geographicae, 35(4), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0037
Section
Articles

References

  1. Andersson L., 2007. Forty years later. A retrospect on marginality and local development. In: Jones G., Leimgruber W., Nel E. (eds), Issues in geographical marginality. General and theoretical aspect. International Geographical Union: 13–28.
  2. Andreoli M., 1994. Development and marginalisation in Liguria region. In: Chang-Yi D., Ching Jou S., Yuh Lu Y. (eds), Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. National Taiwan University, Taipei: 41–60.
  3. Bell S., 2009. Mental map. In: Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds), International encyclopedia of human geography. Elsevier Ltd: 70–75. ISBN 978-0-08-044910-4.
  4. Buchta S., 2003. Slovenský vidiek na konci dvadsiateho storočia. Sociológia-Slovak Sociological Review 2: 125–140.
  5. CEDRA report. Report of the Commission for the Economic Development of Rural Areas Energising Ireland’s rural economy. Online: http://ruralireland.ie/index.php/cedra-reports (accessed 20 Sept. 2015).
  6. CEDRA report. Research report of the Commission on the Economic Development of Rural Ireland. Online: http://ruralireland.ie/index.php/cedra-reports (accessed 20 Sept. 2015).
  7. Che D., 2006. Developing ecotourism in First World, resource-dependent areas. Geoforum 37: 212–226.
  8. Chromý P., 2003. Historical-geographical and cultural-geographical research on the development in border, marginal and peripheral regions in Czechia. In: Kowalczyk
  9. A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Theoretical and methodological challenges. Warsaw: 187–192.
  10. Chromý P., Janů H., 2008. Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential of the development of peripheral regions. In: Svatoňová H. (ed.), Geography in Czechia and Slovakia. Theory and practice at the onset of 21st century. Masaryk University, Brno: 105–107.
  11. Conway T., Cawley M., 2012. Organisational networking in an emerging ecotourism destination. Tourism Planning & Development 9(4): 397–409.
  12. Creamer C., Blair N., Keaveney K., O’Keeffe B., Driscoll J., 2009. Rural restructuring: Local sustainable solutions to the rural challenge. International Centre for Local and Regional Development.
  13. Crewe J., 1991. Defining marginality? Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 10 (1): 121–130.
  14. Cullen B.T., Pretes M., 2000. The meaning of marginality: Interpretations and perceptions in social science. The Social Science Journal 37(2): 215–229.
  15. Dingsdale A., 1999. Redefining Eastern Europe: A new regional geography of post-socialist Europe? Geography 84(3): 204–221.
  16. Džupinová E., Halás M., Horňák M., Hurbánek P., Káčerová M., Michniak D., Ondoš S., Rochovská A., 2008. Periférnosť a priestorová polarizácia na území Slovenska. Geografika, Bratislava: 186.
  17. Falťan Ľ., Gajdoš P., Pašiak J., 1995. Sociálna marginalita území Slovenska. Social Marginality of Territories of Slovakia. SPACE Centrum pre analýzu sociálnej politiky: 223.
  18. Ferrão J., Lopes R., 2004. Understanding peripheral rural areas as contexts for economic development. In: Labrianidis L. (ed.), The future of Europe’s rural peripheries. Ashgate, Aldershot: 31–61.
  19. Gregory D., Johnston R., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S., 2009. The dictionary of human geography. 5th edition, Wiley-Blackwell.
  20. Havlíček T., 2003. Are border regions peripheral territories? In: Kowalczyk A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Theoretical
  21. and methodological challenges. Warsaw: 193–198.
  22. Havlíček T., Chromý P., Jančák V., Marada M., 2005. Vybrané teoreticko-metodologické aspekty a trendy geografického výzkumu periferních oblastí. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta,
  23. Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 6–24.
  24. Hoggart K., Paniagua A., 2001. What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies 17: 41–62.
  25. Hurbánek P., 2004a. Zmeny úlohy priestorového aspektu v interpretáciách pojmov periférnosť (marginalita) a vidiek. Geografie a proměny poznání prostorové reality. Sborník z příspěvků z Mezinárodní geografické konference (Ostrava 30–31.08.2004). Přírodovědecká fakulta, Ostravská Univerzita: 102–110.
  26. Hurbánek P., 2004b. Priestorový aspekt periférnosti v rurálno-geografickej a sídelno-geografickej interpretácii vidieka. Acta Universitatis Purkynianae 100: 49–60.
  27. Jackson P., 2001. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Limb M., Dwyer C. (eds), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates. Arnold, London: 199–214.
  28. Jakešová L., Vaishar A., 2012. Sustainable inner peripheries? A case study of the Olešnice micro-region (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports 20(4): 13–25.
  29. Jeřábek M., Dokoupil J., Havlíček T., 2004. České pohraničíbariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Praha.
  30. Johnston R.J., Gregory D., Pratt G., Watts M., Smith D.M. (eds), 2000. The dictionary of human geography (4th ed.). Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
  31. Labrianidis L., 2004. The future of Europe’s rural peripheries. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  32. Leimgruber W., 1994. Marginality and marginal regions: Problems of definition. In: Chang-Yi D. (ed.), Development issues in marginal regions. Marginality and development
  33. issues in marginal regions. Proceedings of the IGU Study Group. Taipei: 1–18.
  34. Leimgruber W., 2004. Between global and local: Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalisation and deregulation. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  35. Limb M., Dwyer C. (eds), 2001. Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates. Arnold, London.
  36. Máliková L., 2013. Theoretical and methodological aspects of identifying marginal rural areas in the Slovak and Czech studies. In: Zborník príspevkov medzinárodnej konferencie doktorandov MendelNet 2013 (Brno, 20–21.11.2013). Agronomická fakulta, Mendelova Univerzita: 459–464.
  37. Máliková L., Spišiak P., 2013. Vybrané problémy marginality a periférnosti rurálnych regiónov na Slovensku. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 57(1): 51–70.
  38. Máliková L., Klobučník M., Bačík V., Spišiak P., 2015. Socioeconomic changes in the borderland of the Visegrad group (V4) countries. Moravian Geographical Reports 23(2):
  39. –37.
  40. Marada M., 2001. Vymezení periferních oblastí Česka a studium jejich znaků pomocí statistické analýzy. Geografie – Sborník ČGS 106(1): 12–24.
  41. McDonagh J., 2002a. Peripherality and the West of Ireland: The need for reevaluation? In: McDonagh J. (ed.), Economy, society, and peripherality: experiences from the West of Ireland. Arlen House, Galway: 97–112.
  42. McDonagh J. 2002b. Peripheral location, human resource deficit and sustainable rural communities. In: McDonagh J. (ed.), Economy, society, and peripherality: experiences from the West of Ireland. Arlen House, Galway: 165–180.
  43. Mehretu A., Pigozzi B.W., Sommers L.M., 2000. Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler 82 B (2): 89–101.
  44. Musil J., Müller J., 2008. Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 2: 321–348.
  45. Newman D., 2006. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in a ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography 30(1): 143–161.
  46. Perlín R., Kučerová S., Kučera Z., 2010. Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie 115(2): 61–187.
  47. Relph E., 1976. Place and placelessness. Pion, London.
  48. Schmidt M.H., 1998. An integrated systemic approach to marginal regions: From definition to development policies. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception
  49. of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 45–66.
  50. Seidl T., Chromý P., 2010. Problémy integrace marginálního území do regionálného systému: Příklad vojenského újezdu Boletice. Geografie 115(1): 44–63.
  51. Shobe H., Banis D., 2010. Music regions and mental maps: Teaching cultural geography. Journal of Geography 109(2): 87–96.
  52. Sommers L.M., Mehretu A., 1998. International perspectives on socio-spatial marginality. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 135–145.
  53. Šebová L., 2013. Identifikácia marginálnych regiónov na Slovensku. Dizertačná práca. Prírodovedecká fakulta Univerzity Komenského, Bratislava.
  54. Tuan Y.F., 1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
  55. Tykkyläinen M., 1998. From territorial marginality to marginality in cybersociety. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 123–132.
  56. Vaishar A., Zapletalová J., 2005. Marginalizace moravsko-slovenského pohraničí. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze. Přírodovědecká
  57. fakulta. Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 167–176.
  58. Woods M., 2005. Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. Sage, London.
  59. Woods M., 2007. Engaging the global countryside: Globalisation, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography 31(4): 485–507.
  60. Woods M., 2011. Rural. Routledge, London.