Abstract
Networking should be considered an important aspect of the history of pan-Asian thought. The Philippine Revolution (1896–98) and the Philippine-American War (1899–1902) provide an example of events that helped form unexpected links. Mariano Ponce’s stay in Japan to lobby for support of the revolution influenced Yamada Bimyō to publish a series of works in 1902–1903. This article provides an analysis of Yamada’s techniques for creating a discourse of Japanese-Filipino solidarity in Momoiroginu and Aginarudo: Firipin Dokuritsu Senwa. While Yamada is frequently mentioned in studies of the Japanese reception of the Philippine Revolution, there is no in-depth analysis of these texts. To fill this gap, I employ Gérard Genette’s concept of transtextuality to first, show how Yamada referenced/rewrote his sources while simultaneously inserting original ideas and second, to address the fact that one of Yamada’s texts was transtextually re-contextualized during the Pacific War.
References
Agoncillo, Teodoro A. 1990. History of the Filipino people. Quezon City: R. P. Garcia Publishing Co.
Allen, Graham 2022. Intertextuality. London and New York: Routledge.
Apacible, G., E. Riego, Celestino Rodriguez, Cayetano Lukban 1901. “Appeal of the central committee to the president of the United States”. The Public, 14 December: 572–575. URL: https://babel.hathitrust.org/
cgi/pt?id=njp.32101054790298&seq=578 [access date: 9 February 2025]
Boston Evening Transcript 1901. “The campaign in Luzon: A brief summary of the war in 1899”. 22 April. URL: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2249&dat=19010422&id=naY-AAAAIBAJ&sjid=nFk MAAAAIBAJ&pg=6350,2867544&hl=en [access date: 9 February 2025]
Bridgman, Raymond L. 1903. Loyal traitors: A story of friendship for the Filipinos. Boston: James H. West Company.
Constantino, Renato 1975. A history of the Philippines: from the Spanish colonization to the Second World War. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
CuUnjieng Aboitiz, Nicole 2020. Asian place, Filipino nation: A global intellectual history of the Philippine Revolution, 1887–1912. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/cuun19214
Genette, Gérard 1997. Palimpsests: A literature in the second degree. Trans. Channa Newman, Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hau, Caroline S., Takashi Shiraishi 2009. “Daydreaming about Rizal and Tetchō: On Asianism as network and fantasy”. Philippine Studies 57 (3): 329–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/2244-1638.1684
Hatano Masaru 1988. “Firipin dokuritsu undō to Nihon no taiō [Philippine independence movement and Japan’s responses]”. Ajia Kenkyū 34 (4): 69– 95. 波多野勝.「フィリピン独立運動と日本の対応」『アジア研究』.
Hayase, Shinzo 1999. “Japan and the Philippines”. Philippine Studies 47 (1): 30–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/2244-1638.4288
Hess, Jean 1899a. “Aux Philippines (de notre envoyé special) [in the Philippines (from our special correspondent)]”. Le Figaro, 28 July: 3. URL: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k284830x/f3.item [access date: 4 February 2025].
Hess, Jean 1899b. “A French view of the war in the Philippines”. The Public,
19 August: 13–16. URL: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101054790264&seq=323 [access date: 4 February 2025]
Ikehata Setsuho 2001. “Meiji-ki Nihon-ni okeru Firipin-e-no kanshin” [Japanese interest in the Philippines during the Meiji era]. Ajia Afurika Gengo Bunka Kenkyū 61: 203–230. 池端雪浦.「明治期日本におけるフィリピンへの関心」『アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究』.
Joaquin, Nick 1977. A question of heroes: Essays in criticism on ten key figures of Philippine history. Metro Manila: Filipinas Foundation.
Kennedy, Charles Stuart 1990. The American consul: A history of the United States consular service, 1776–1914. New York, Westport, London: Greenwood Press.
Kimura Ki 1942. Manira kikō: Minami-no shinju [travelogue from Manila: the pearl of the south]. Osaka: Zenkoku Shobō. 木村毅.『マニラ紀行 南の眞珠』. 大阪:全國書房.
Larned, Josephus Nelson 1901. History for ready reference: from the best historians, biographers, and specialists their own words in a complete system of history for all uses, extending to all countries and subjects, and representing for both readers and students the better and newer literature of history in the English language, vol. VI. Springfield, Mass.: The C.A. Nichols, Co.
McCullough, Helen Craig (trans.) 1959. The Taiheiki: A chronicle of medieval Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.
McCullough, Helen Craig (trans.) 1966. Yoshitsune: A fifteenth-century Japanese chronicle. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Nery, John 2011. Revolutionary spirit: Jose Rizal in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814345064
Nihon Kindai Bungakukan (ed.) 1992. Nihon kindai bungaku daijiten: kijōban [the great dictionary of modern Japanese literature: Desk edition]. Tokyo: Kōdansha. 日本近代文学館編.『日本近代文学大辞典 机上版』. 東京都:講談社.
Peattie, Mark R. 1988. Nan’yō: The rise and fall of the Japanese in Micronesia, 1885–1945. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824843090
Ponce, Mariano 1901. Nan’yō-no fūun: Firipin dokuritsu mondai-no shinsō [the situation in the South Seas: The truth about the problem of Philippine independence]. Translated by Miyamoto Heikurō, Fujita Suetaka. Tokyo: Hakubunkan. ポンセ、マリアノ.『南洋之風雲 比律賓獨立問題之真相』. 宮本平九郎、藤田季荘共訳. 東京都:博文館.
Serizawa, Takamichi 2015. “Japanese Solidarity Discourse on the Philippines during the Second World War”. Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints 63 (1): 71–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2015.0001
Shimizu, Hiromu 1998. “Imaging a revolution in the Philippines: Japanese dreams of expanding to the Southern Seas”. In: Elmer A. Ordoñez (ed.). Toward the first Asian republic: Papers from the Jakarta International Conference on the centenary of the Philippine Revolution and the first Asian republic. Manila: Philippine Centennial Commission. 208–218.
Shioda Ryōhei 1938. Yamada Bimyō kenkyū [study of Yamada Bimyō]. Kyoto: Jinbun Shoin. 塩田良平.『山田美妙研究』. 京都:人文書院.
Shioda Ryōhei 1990 [1942]. “Kaidai [commentary]”. In: Yamada Bimyō.
Aginarudo: Firippin dokuritsusenwa. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron. 269–289. 塩田良平.「解題」.山田美妙.『あぎなるど フィリッピン独立戦話』. 東京都:中央公論.
Tsuchiya Shinobu 2013. Nan’yō bungaku-no seisei: otozureru koto-to omou koto [the formulation of Nan’yō literature: visits and thoughts]. Tokyo: Shintensha. 土屋忍.『南洋文学の生成 訪れることと想うこと』. 東京都:新典社.
Tucker, Spencer C. (ed.) 2009. The encyclopedia of the Spanish-American and Philippine-American wars: A political, social, and military history. Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford: ABC-CLIO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400645662
Welch, Richard E., Jr. 1964. “Senator George Frisbie Hoar and the defeat of Anti-Imperialism, 1898–1900”. The Historian 26 (3): 362–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1964.tb00254.x
Wildman, Edwin 1901. Aguinaldo: A narrative of Filipino ambitions. Boston: Lothrop Publishing Company.
Yamada Bimyō 1902a. Aginarudo: Firipin dokuritsu senwa, zempen [Aguinaldo: The tale of the Philippine independence war, volume one]. Tokyo: Naigai shuppan kyōkai. 山田美妙.『あぎなるど 比律賓獨立戦話』前編. 東京都:内外出版協會.
Yamada Bimyō 1902b. Aginarudo: Firipin dokuritsu senwa, kōhen [Aguinaldo: The tale of the Philippine independence war, volume two]. Tokyo: Naigai shuppan kyōkai. 山田美妙.『あぎなるど 比律賓獨立戦話』後編. 東京都:内外出版協會.
Yamada Bimyō 1902c. Momoiroginu: Seiji shōsetsu [peach-colored silk. Political novel]. Tokyo: Aoki Sūzandō. 山田美妙.『桃色絹 政治小説』. 東京都:青木嵩山堂.
Yamashita Hiroaki (annotation) 1980. Taiheiki 2. Tokyo: Shinchōsha. 山下宏明 校注. 『太平記』二. 東京都:新潮社.
Yamashita Hiroaki (annotation) 1983. Taiheiki 3. Tokyo: Shinchōsha. 山下宏明 校注. 『太平記』三. 東京都:新潮社.
Yamashita Michiko 2000. “Nanshin-no manazashi: Meiji 20–30-nendai-ni okeru Firipin-no egakikata [views on southward advance: Portrayal of the Philippines in the second and third decade of Meiji period]”. Sōgō Bunka Kenkyū 3: 77–99. 山下美知子.「南進のまなざし 明治二〇~三〇年代におけるフィリピンの描き方」.『総合文化研究』
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Przemysław Sztafiej

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

