POLITICAL THEORY'S IMAGINATION. A FEW REMARKS ON WIKTOR MARZEC BOOK
PDF

Keywords

sociological imagination
the political
political subjectivity
political theories imagination

How to Cite

Ozimek, M. (2017). POLITICAL THEORY’S IMAGINATION. A FEW REMARKS ON WIKTOR MARZEC BOOK. Society Register, 1(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2017.1.1.14

Abstract

Social sciences, understood as critical and not neutral by nature, they should be equipped with specific competencies and sensivity. C.  W. Mills these comptence define as sociological imagination – which is study of the relationship of history and biography, Giddens interpreted it as three basic senses: historical, anthropological, critical. The translation into political science would be a political theories imagination, it consist,, among over things like a: historicity of political phenomena, antisubstansialism, research self-awareness. Definition of political theories imagination I propose in the context of Wiktor Marzec’s paper Rebelion and Reaction, which is a study from field of historical sociology, it’s in itself a lot of inspiration for theorists of politics: research, theoretical and methodological. It is worth considering – in this context – fundamental categories of political science, like political subjectivity and the political, also revalidate in their range.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2017.1.1.14
PDF

References

Austin, John L. 1993. Jak działać słowami? [w:] Mówienie i poznawanie. Rozprawy i wykłady filozoficzne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 535-708.

Cymbrowski, Borys. 2015. Od historyzmu do socjologii historycznej. Szkic o metodologii [w:] Socjologia historyczna. Wokół wyzwań teoretycznych i praktyki badawczej, red. B. Cymbrowski, K. Frysztacki. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 61-75.

Cymbrowski, Borys i Krzysztof Frysztacki. 2015. Socjologowie patrzą wstecz. Socjologia historyczna między teorią społeczną a splotem subdyscyplin szczegółowych, [w:] Socjologia historyczna. Wokół wyzwań teoretycznych i praktyki badawczej, red. B. Cymbrowski, K. Frysztacki, Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 11-20.

Giddens, Anthony. 1998. Socjologia. Zwięzłe, lecz krytyczne wprowadzenie. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo.

Karwat, Mirosław. 1996. Cecha polityczności i dziedzina teorii polityki [w:] Carl Schmitt i współczesna myśl polityczna, red. R. Skarzyński, Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa, 107-135.

Karwat, Mirosław. 1989. Człowiek polityczny. Próba interpretacji marksistowskiej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Karwat, Mirosław. 1980. Podmiotowość polityczna. Humanistyczna interpretacja polityki w marksizmie. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Karwat, Mirosław. 2013. Podmiotowość polityczna [w:] Leksykon pojęć politycznych, red. M. Karwat, J. Ziółkowski. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa, 228-232.

Karwat, Mirosław. 2010. „Polityczność i upolitycznienie. Metodologiczne ramy analizy.” Studia Politologiczne 17: 63-87.

Karwat, Mirosław. 2009. Syndromatyczny charakter przedmiotu nauki o polityce, [w:] Demokratyczna Polska w globalizującym się świecie. I Ogólnopolski Kongres Politologii, Warszawa, 22-24 września 2009, red. K. A. Wojtaszczyk, A. Mirska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

Kozłowski, Michał. 2017. Rebelia a przełom, http://www.lewica.pl/?id=31482&tytul=Micha%B3-Koz%B3owski:-Rebelia-a-prze%B3om [dostęp: marzec 2017]

Marzec, Wiktor. 2016. Rebelia i reakcja. Rewolucja 1905 roku i plebejskie doświadczenie polityczne. Łódź-Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Universitas.

Mucha, Janusz. 1986. Socjologia jako krytyka społeczna. Orientacja radykalna i krytyczna we współczesnej socjologii zachodniej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Mills, Charles W. 2007. Wyobraźnia socjologiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Młyńczyk, Łukasz. 2015. „Analiza u źródeł poznania teorii polityki i metodologii badań politologicznych w Polsce. Czy można i należy odseparować naukę od ideologii?” Annales. Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 22(2): 85-100.

Młyńczyk, Łukasz. 2013. „Politolog w sporze z metodą. Quasi-badacz a quasi-ekspert.” Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne 39: 9-19.

Polityczność plebsu. Rozmowa M. Roszkowskiej z W. Marcem (2016), http://notesna6tygodni.pl/?q=polityczno%C5%9B%C4%87-plebsu-wiktor-marzec [dostęp: marzec 2017].

Rancière, Jacques. 2007a. Dzielenie postrzegalnego. Estetyka i polityka. Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art.

Rancière, Jacques. 2007b. Estetyka jako polityka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Rancière, Jacques. 2008. Na brzegach politycznego. Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art.

Siermiński, Michał. 2016. Dekada przełomu. Polska lewica opozycyjna 1968-1980. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.

Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.

In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.

1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the  legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.

1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.

2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:

2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including  printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;

2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;

2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting,  made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;

2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);

2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;

2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of  the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;

2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;

2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.

3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.

4. The  Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.

5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:

5.1.  allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;

5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;

5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).

6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).

7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis

7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.

7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.