JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN IN ARGENTINA: A BACKLASH TO CONSERVATIVE DISCOURSES

Main Article Content

YAMILA VANESA RODRIGUEZ

Abstract

The author uses Critical Discourse Analysis to compare two legal documents of critical relevance for the rights of children in conflict with the law in Argentina: the current law no. 22,278, called Régimen Penal de la Minoridad, and the project named Sistema de Responsabilidad Penal Juvenil which was under consideration by the National Congress during 2019. This project was proposed by the government so as to stablish a new juvenile justice system in Argentina, following a widely spread tendency in the Latin American region. The purpose of the article is to show that, even though the language of human rights is used in official discourse and in the legal text submitted to Parliament, many of its features represent a clear backlash to a more conservative regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
RODRIGUEZ, Y. V. (2019). JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN IN ARGENTINA: A BACKLASH TO CONSERVATIVE DISCOURSES. Society Register, 3(4), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.4.10
Section
Discussions and research notes
Author Biography

YAMILA VANESA RODRIGUEZ, University of Buenos Aires

Yamila Vanessa Rodriguez, MA, Department of Law, University of Buenos Aires in Argentina. She is a lawyer and children’s rights activists.

References

  1. Argentina. Base general de datos de niños, niñas y adolescentes. Informe de 2016. Available at https://www.csjn.gov.ar/bgd/verMultimedia?data=1430
  2. Argentina. Base general de datos de niños, niñas y adolescentes. Informe de 2017. Available at https://www.csjn.gov.ar/bgd/verMultimedia?data=2210
  3. Argentina. Base general de datos de niños, niñas y adolescentes. Informe de 2018. Available at https://www.csjn.gov.ar/bgd/verMultimedia?data=2210 https://www.csjn.gov.ar/bgd/verMultimedia?data=3110
  4. Argentina. Exposición de motivos. Available at https://www.justicia2020.gob.ar/eje-penal/sistema-penal-juvenil/
  5. Baratta, Alessandro. 2001. Criminología crítica y crítica del derecho penal. Introducción a la sociología jurídico penal. Translated by Búnster, A. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
  6. Bassel, Leah, & Emejulu, Akwugo. 2014. “Solidarity Under Austerity: Intersectionality in France and the United Kingdom.” Politics & Gender 10 (01): 130–136.
  7. Beloff, Mary & Langer, Máximo. 2015. “Myths and Realities of Juvenile Justice in Latin America” in Juvenile Justice in Global Perspective, edited by F. Zimring, M. Langer & D. Tanenhaus. New York and London: New York University Press.
  8. Committee on the Rights of the Child. 2019. General comment No. 24 on children’s rights in the child.
  9. De Melo Resende, Viviane. “Dessemelhança e expurgo do outro no debate acerca do rebaixamento da maioridade penal no brasil: uma análise discursiva crítica” in Forma y Función 22, 1: 145-159.
  10. Donaldson, Sue & Kymlicka, Will. 2016. “Rethinking Membership and Participation in an Inclusive Democracy” in Disability and Political Theory edited by B. Arneil & N. Hirschmann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Emejulu Akwugo & Konstantoni, Kristina. 2016. “When intersectionality met childhood studies: the dilemmas of a travelling concept” Children's Geographies: 1-17.
  12. Erikson, Erik. 1965. Childhood and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  13. Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
  14. Graham, Jesse; Haidt, Jonathan & Nosek, Brian. 2009. “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029-1046.
  15. Haidt, Jonathan & Graham, Jesse. 2007. “When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize”. Social Justice Research, 20: 98-116.
  16. Hunt Federle, Katherine. 1993. “On the Road to Reconceiving Rights for Children: A Postfeminist Analysis of the Capacity Principle”. DePaul Law Review 42 (3): 983- 1028.
  17. Hulsman, Louk H. C. 1986. “Critical criminology and the concept of crime”. Crime, Law and Social Change 10 (1): 63-80.
  18. Interamerican Court of Human Rights. Mendoza and others v Argentina. Judgment of May 14th, 2013. (Preliminary Objections, Merits and Reparations).
  19. Mayall, Berry. 2000. “The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights”. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 8: 243–259.
  20. Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna; Honkatukia, Päivi & Ruuskanen, Minna. 2007. “Legal Texts as Discourses” in Exploiting the Limits of Law, edited by Gunnarsson, A., Svensson, E. & Davis, M. Hampshire: Ashgate.
  21. Odrowasz- Coates, Anna. 2019. “Gender equality and children`s equality in liberal and conservative discourses. Implications towards language and society” in this volume.
  22. Steiner, Gary. 2013. Animals and the Limits of Postmodernism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  23. Taylor, Ian; Walton, Paul & Young, Jock. 1974. “Advances towards a critical criminology”. Theory and Society 1 (4): 441-476.
  24. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights. 2018. Committee on the Rights of the Child considers report of Argentina. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23088&LangID=E