Keywords
English Language
Power
Education
Gender
Communication
Discourse.
Number of views: 593
Number of downloads: 459
Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines the influence and power of language in education in Nigeria from the precolonial to colonial and post-colonial times. This is with regards to the effect of language on gender issues within the country. Nigeria, a country on the west coast of Africa is multi-ethnic with over 150 (one hundred and fifty) ethnic groups with their different indigenous languages and cultures. As a colony of the British, the Christian missionaries who first introduced western form of education in Nigeria used the British English language as a medium of communication and subsequently with the establishment of colonial administration in the country, English language was made the official language of the country. This paper contains a critical analysis of the use of English Language in the country and its implications on communication in social and economic interactions of individuals within the various communities across the country. It argues that the proliferation of the English language was through education of which the male gender benefitted more than their female counterparts due to the patriarchal dominance in the country. The data for the study was collated from random interviews and other written sources. The research discovered that the knowledge and ability to speak fluently and write the English language had a direct influence on the socio-political and economic status of individuals within the country. The women who benefitted from this were comparatively fewer than the men due to some prevailing conditions of what could be called in the present the subjugation of women the society. Critical discourse analysis is adopted for this study. It argues that English language dependency by Nigerians shows that forms of the colonial experience is still evident and these were all initiated during the past interactions with west through the transatlantic slave trade and colonial rule. This is because discourse as a social construct is created and perpetuated by the persons who have the language power and means of communication. The Nigerian family being of a conservative orientation derives its power directly from the father who is the patriarch of the family as obtained in the traditional set up of communities and the Nigerian society in general. This has grave effect on the opposite gender
References
Agayi, Ade. 1965. Christian Missionay in Nigeria 1841-1891: The Making of a new Elite. London: Longman.
Akpan, Charles, P. 1996. “Gender imbalance in Access to Education implication for development in South eastern. Nigeria.” Pp. 171-180 in Women development and the Nigerian environment, edited by Y. Oruwari. Ibadan: Vintage publishers.
Ayandele, Emmanuel. 1966. The missionary impact on modern Nigeria: A political and social Analysis. London: Longman.
Aye, Efiong. 1967. Old Calabar Through the centuries. Calabar.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Jeane-Claude Paserson. 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Breseall, Victoria et al. 2013. “The effect of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(6): 891-908.
Cordier, Bernard. 2012. “Gender, betwixt biology and society.” Sexologies 21(4): 192- 194.
Corson, David. 1995. Discourse and power in educational organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Effah-Attoe Stella A. 2018. “Gender Mainstreamism in Nigeria’s Political Development. From Hindsight to Foresight.” 79th Inaugural Lecture, University of Calabar.
Fatunwa, Babs. 2004. History of Education in Nigeria. Ibadan: NPC Educational Pub. Ltd.
Foucault, Michael. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse language. New York: Partheon.
Foucault, Michael. 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Panthom.
Good, Carter. 1959. Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Idyorough, A. 2005. Gender: concepts and issues in Nigeria. Makurdi, Aboki Pub.
Ikime, Obauro. 1980. Government of Nigerian History. Ibadan Heinemann.
Ikpe, E. B. 2004. “The Historical Legacy of Gender Inequality in Nigeria.” in Paradox of Gender Equality in Nigerian politics, edited by S. O. Akinboye. Lagos: Concept Pub. Ltd.
Imam, Hauwa. 2012. “Educational Policy in Nigeria from the Colonial Era to the Post-Independence Period.” Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 1.
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Sussex: Rowman and Allanheld.
Mba, Nina, Emma. 1982. Nigeria women mobilized: Women political activity in southern Nigeria, 1900-1965. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.
Mojekuru-Chikezie, Neamaka. 2012. African Women sentenced by tradition. Lagos: Nwokebi A.A. and Coy.
Nigeria. 2010. Nigeria at 50: A Compendium: The Official and Authoritative Book about Nigeria: 1st October Publishing.
Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft power: The mears to success in world politics. New York Public Affairs Press.
Ocitti, J. 1973. African indigenous Education: As practice by the Acholi of Uganda. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.
Odrowąż-Coates Anna. 2019. Socio-educational factors and the soft power of language: the deluge of English in Poland and Portugal. London: Lexington Books [Rowman & Littlefield].
Odrowąż-Coates, Anna. 2015. “Gender Crisis in Poland, Catholic Ideology and the Media.” Sociology Mind 5: 27-34.
Odrowąż-Coates, Anna. 2018. “Soft power of language in social inclusion and exclusion and the unintended outcomes in Language.” Discourse and Society 6 (2):15-30.
Pereira Charmaine. 2007. Gender in the Making of the Nigerian University System. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books.
Piscoe, Victor., Moeketsi. Letseka. 2013. “Fourcault’s Discourse and power implications for structionist classroom management.” Open Journal of Philosophy 3(1): 23-28.
Pocock John. Greville. Agard. 2018. “Theory in History Problems of Context and Narrative.” in The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by R. E. Goodin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popkewitz, Thomas S. 1997. “Restricting of social and political theory in education four fowcault and a social epistemology of school practices.” Educational theory 47: 287-313.
Silberschmidt, Margrethe. 1999. Women Forget that Men are their Masters. UPPSALA, Sweden. Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
Talbari, Aziz. 1996. “Pedagogy, Power and discourse: Transformation of Islamic Education.” Comparative Education Review 40: 66-82.
Weedon, Chris. 1997. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Woolman, David. 2001. “Educational Reconstruction and Post-colonial Curriculum Development: A Comparative study of four African Countries.” International Education Journal 2(5): 27-46.
License
Manuscript authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permissions for any copyrighted materials included within manuscripts. The authors must provide permission letters, when appropriate, to the Society Register Editors.
In addition, all published papers in Society Register are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern CC BY-NC 4.0 as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.