CHILD PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY DECISION-MAKING: THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RUSSIAN PARENTS’ FORUM
PDF

Keywords

Children’s rights
CDA
child’s participation in family design-making
site discussion
parent’s discourse
parent’s forum

Abstract

The topic of children's participation in various issues was updated in the second half of the last century. It was largely due to the adoption of an important international document such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children are as important participants in social life as adults so they have the right to express their opinions on various issues related to their activities, as well as to take into account these opinions by adults in decision-making in the family, in school, in the community, etc. Russian society is dominated by the traditional discourse of the perception of children as human becoming, socially and mentally immature, not-yet-an-adult. To study the parental discourse of children's participation in family issues, empirical material of the network discussion organized at the parental forum called Vladmama (Vladivostok, Russia) is used. In order to organize the discussion, an information injection was carried out. It was the description of the imagined problematic situation of child-parental relations on the issue of child’s participation in family affairs. The 81 messages received from 25 users were analyzed according to James Gee approach.  Seven Gee’s “building tasks” (Activities; Identities; Relationships; Politics; Connections; Sign Systems and Knowledge) are researched on the materials of mother’s forum. The process of creating value is always connected with the exercise of power. In our case, mothers using their power as parents redefine the meanings of children's participation. The main resource that opens the way for adults to power is money. Earning money is interpreted by the participants of the forum as a way for a child to involve in the adult’s world, an opportunity to legalize the child’s right to express his/her own opinion and defend this opinion. Other sources of parent’s power are their own life experience, knowledge and social skills.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.4.09
PDF

References

Abrosimova, E.E. Ardal'yanova A.Yu. Filipova A.G. Setevaya diskussiya na roditel'skom forume kak istochnik empiricheskih dannyh: osobennosti sbora i analiza materialov. V sbornike: "ZHizn' na chemodanah": mobil'nost' sem'i i social'noe blagopoluchie Vladivostok, 2018. S. 169-180.

Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. In: Journal of the American Planning Association. 35: 4, p. 216 - 224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Access date: September 10, 2019.

Gee, J. 2011. How to do discourse analysis: A tool kit. New York: Routledge.

Handley, G. 2005. Children’s rights to participation. In: Waller, T. 2005. Early childhood: a multidisciplinary approach. London: Paul Chapman.

Hart, R. A. 1999. Children’s Participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.

Holland, S. O’Neill, S. 2006. We Had to be there to make Sure it Was What We Wanted. Enabling Children’s Participation in Family Decision-making through the Family group Conference. In: Childhood. 13 (1). p. 91-111.

Jones, P., Walker, G. (Eds.). 2011. Children’s Rights in Practice. London: Sage.

Lansdown, G. 2005. The evolving capacities of the child. Florence: The Unicef Innocenti Research Centre.

Metodicheskie rekomendacii po razvitiyu uchastiya detej v prinyatii reshenij, zatragivayushchih ih interesy, v municipal'nyh obrazovaniyah / pod red. I. E. Kalabihinoj. Moskva.: Fond podderzhki detej, nahodyashchihsya v trudnoj zhiznennoj situacii, 2014. 114 s.

Sinclair, R. 2004. Participation in Practice: Making it meaningful, effective end sustainable. In: Children& Society. 18. p. 106-118.

Wyness, M.G. 2012. Children’s participation and intergenerational dialogue: Bringing adults back into the analysis. In: Childhood. 120 (4). p. 429-442.