OWN EXPERIENCES OF ABORTION IN DESCRIPTIONS OF PEOPLE ASSOCIATED IN PRO-CHOICE GROUPS ON FACEBOOK IN POLAND

Main Article Content

KLEMENTYNA KULETA

Abstract

A restrictive anti-abortion law is in force in Poland. However, many people terminate pregnancy in cases other than those specified in the Act. Public discourse on this subject is dominated by philosophical and legal issues, and it lacks the voices of those who terminated the pregnancy. Abortion is often presented as a sad necessity, as always difficult or traumatic. I conducted research on describing own abortion experiences by people from Facebook pro-choice groups. 99 respondents who had 102 abortions completed an anonymous online questionnaire. From the material of answers, I selected categories that were used to analyze the results of the study: positive emotions, negative emotions, pregnancy as a burden, good experience, difficulty experience, stigmatization, support. It turned out that the experiences of termination of pregnancy were diverse. Respondents, describing their experiences, discussed topics rarely present in the discourse, such as the fact that abortion can be a good experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
KULETA, K. (2020). OWN EXPERIENCES OF ABORTION IN DESCRIPTIONS OF PEOPLE ASSOCIATED IN PRO-CHOICE GROUPS ON FACEBOOK IN POLAND. Society Register, 4(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.1.07
Section
Articles by early stage researchers
Author Biography

KLEMENTYNA KULETA, The Maria Grzegorzewska University

Klementyna Kuleta holds an MA in Education. She obtained the title at the Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland.

References

  1. Abrams, Paula. 2015. “The Bad Mother: Stigma, Abortion and Surrogacy.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43(2): 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12231
  2. Budgał, Karina. 2011. „Jestem za prawem do aborcji, ale sama nigdy bym jej nie zrobiła. O sabotażu językowym.” Pp. 9-10 in A jak hipokryzja. Antologia tekstów o aborcji, władzy, pieniądzach i sprawiedliwości, edited by C. Snochowska-Gonzalez. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo O matko!
  3. CBOS. 2013. Komunikat z badań. Doświadczenia aborcyjne Polek. Warszawa: Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Publicznej. BS/60/2013. Retrieved November 15, 2019 (https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2013/K_060_13.PDF).
  4. Donath, Orna. 2017. Żałując macierzyństwa. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Kobiece.
  5. Grzywacz, Anka et al. 2013. 20 lat tzw. ustawy antyaborcyjnej w Polsce. Warszawa: Federacja na Rzecz Kobiet i Planowania Rodziny. Retrieved November 15, 2019 (http://federa.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/raport_federacja_2013.pdf).
  6. Hanschmidt, Franz. 2016. “Abortion Stigma: A Systematic Review.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 48(4): 169-177. doi: 10.1363/48e8516
  7. Jesudason, Sujatha and Tracy Weitz. 2015. “Eggs and Abortion: ‘Women-Protective’ Language Used by Opponents in Legislative Debates over Reproductive Health.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43(2): 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12241
  8. Kligman, Gail. 2010. Polityka obłudy. Kontrola rozrodczości w Rumunii pod rządami Ceausescu. Kraków: Universitas.
  9. Millar, Erica. 2017. Happy abortions. Our bodies in the era of choice. London: ZED.
  10. Nowicka, Wanda. 2007. „Prawa reprodukcyjne w Polsce.” Pp. 663-679 in Czarna księga kobiet, edited by Ch. Ockrent. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.
  11. Szczuka, Kazimiera.2004. Milczenie owieczek. Rzecz o aborcji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.
  12. Wejbert-Wąsiewicz, Ewelina. 2009. „Wokół aborcji. O konflikcie wartości i emocji.” Pp. 201-224 in Emocje a kultura i życie społeczne, edited by P. Binder, H. Palska, W. Pawlik. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  13. Wejbert-Wąsiewicz, Ewelina. 2012. Aborcja w dyskursie publicznym. Monografia zjawiska. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  14. Wejbert-Wąsiewicz, Ewelina. 2017. Bez retuszu czy po liftingu? Obrazy starości i aborcji w filmie. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  15. WHO. 2011. Unsafe abortion. Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Genewa: World Health Organization.
  16. Ziegler, Mary. 2013. “Women’s Rights on the Right: The history and Stakes of Modern Pro-Life Feminism.” Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 28: 232-268.
  17. Żuk, Piotr and Paweł Żuk. 2017. “Women’s health as an ideological and political issue: Restricting the right to abortion, access to in vitro fertilization procedures, and prenatal testing in Poland.” Health Care for Women International 38(7): 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1322595