WHEN UNIVERSITY BECOMES THE ENEMY: HATE SPEECH ATTACKS ON FACEBOOK
PDF

Keywords

Critical discourse analysis
Hate speech
Facebook
Brazil
ultra right

Number of views: 503


Number of downloads: 321

Abstract

The extreme right hate speech propagated currently in Brazil addresses a broad social spectrum, from feminist movements to traditional communities. The academic community and higher education institutions are also targets, as they are identified as poles of democratic resistance. Specific hate speech towards academy in Brazil is the subject of this paper. The persecution of academic community and knowledge itself occurs through the discursive dispute especially on social networks, and thus in this analytical exercise, we looked up at Facebook’s largest bolsonarista’s group – the “Jair Bolsonaro Presidency Support Group”, which brings together 317,000 members. We analyzed the memetic discourse on the page, focusing memes that were published between April and June 2019, thematizing higher public education, and presenting a bimodal verb-visual composition. These criteria led to the collection of 115 memes analyzed with the support of a QDA package. Analysis reveals the disqualification of university institutions and their actors through ironies, negative associations including stereotypes, simplification of debate to the shallower. Students are often associated with nudity as immorality, professors of indoctrination and ridicule, protesters of ignorance, or bad character. Political debate is reduced to extreme left-right polarization, with the criminalization of the left.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.1.03
PDF

References

Ballestrin, Luciana. 2018. “Desafios à democracia e as experiências do Sul Global.” Keynote Speech at 4º Simpósio Nacional sobre Democracia e Desigualdade. Brasília, Brasil.

Barbosa, Muryatan. 2018. “Desafios à democracia e as experiências do Sul Global.” Keynote Speech at 4º Simpósio Nacional sobre Democracia e Desigualdade. Brasília, Brasil.

Benesch, Susan. 2012. “Dangerous Speech: A Proposal to Prevent Group Violence.” World Policy Journal XXIX/3. Retrieved November 20, 2019 (https://worldpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Dangerous-Speech-Guidelines-Benesch-January-2012.pdf).

Brugger, Winfried. 2007. “Proibição ou proteção do discurso do ódio? Algumas observações sobre o direito alemão e o americano.” Direito Público 4(15): 117-136.

Chagas, Viktor, Fernanda Freire, Daniel Rios and Dandara Magalães. 2017. “A política dos memes e os memes da política: proposta metodológica de análise de conteúdo de memes dos debates eleitorais de 2014.” Intexto 38 (1): 173-196.

Dawkins, Richard. 2001. O gene egoísta. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia.

Fausto, Boris. 1998 “Ensaio bibliográfico: a interpretação do nazismo, na visão de Norbert Elias.” Mana 4 (1): 141-152.

Freitas, Riva and Matheus Castro. 2013. “Liberdade de Expressão e Discurso do Ódio: um exame sobre as possíveis limitações à liberdade de expressão.” Sequência 34(66): 227-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2013v34n66p327

Gagliardone, Iginio, Danit Gal, Thiago Alves nad Gabriela Martinez. 2015. Countering online hate speech. Unesco Publishing. Retrieved November 20, 2019 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284157227).

Junqueira, Antolo. 2016. “Os memes e sua apropriação pelo marketing digital.” Signos do Consumo 8(2): 19-29. https://www.bing.com/search?q=junqueira%2C+a.+h.+os+memes

Kaysel, André. 2018. “Desafios à democracia e as experiências do Sul Global.” Keynote Speech at 4º Simpósio Nacional sobre Democracia e Desigualdade. Brasília, Brasil.

Silva, Andréa. 2018. “Memes, educação e cultura de compartilhamento nas redes sociais.” Artefactum 17(2): 1-19. http://artefactum.rafrom.com.br/index.php/artefactum/article/view

Silva, Rosane, Andressa Nichel, Anna Clara, Lehmann Martins and Carlise Borchardt. 2011. “Discursos de ódio em redes sociais: jurisprudência brasileira.” Revista Direito GV 7(2): 445-465. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/revdireitogv/article/view

Waldron, Jeremy. 2017. “Dignity and defamation: the visibility of hate.” Harvard Law Review 123 (7): 1597-1654.