SKOLOMBO AND THEIR CONTINUED EXISTENCE: REVISITING LOST HUMANISM AND PARENTIFICATION IMPULSE

Main Article Content

CHINYERE L. OKAM

Abstract

This paper examines the Skolombo-street children of Calabar. It also investigates the reason for their continued existence, the derivatives in form of social and economic insecurity, inequality and other monstrosities visible in their presence. It questions the oblivious role of the institutions responsible for the care of the child, and parentification impulse as well as the lost humanism which existed in high premium in traditional African society resisted and reflected by text and language. The study is anchored upon Theo Van Leeuwen’s perspective on Critical Discourse Analysis which primarily studies the way social-power abuse and inequality are enacted, reproduced, legitimized, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. The study is a qualitative research conducted with the eclectic research methodologies such as biography, Participant Observation and Conversation. Among other findings, this study reveals that the Cross river state government has not provided enough fair ground to fully tackle the social and economic needs of the street child, that the desired comfort has not been provided for the girl child and that they have not been able to fully integrate the Skolombo into the echelon of the privileged. Conclusively, this has created spaces for youth delinquency, thievery, moral laxity and decadence. In the light of the findings, it is recommended that the government needs to put alternative and effective measures to play with the aim to curbing the menace of Skolombo and the street child culture. There ought to be an implementation of the child right boy and girl child. Stringent punishment should be meted on parents, religious leadact in the global space in order to reduce the molestation and marginalization of the ers and guardians who subject children to unnecessary molestation. Religious leaders and parents should be sensitized about the need to integrate their children within the family, intervention should be made compulsory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
OKAM, C. L. (2020). SKOLOMBO AND THEIR CONTINUED EXISTENCE: REVISITING LOST HUMANISM AND PARENTIFICATION IMPULSE. Society Register, 3(4), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.4.05
Section
Articles
Author Biography

CHINYERE L. OKAM, University of Calabar

Chinyere L. Okam , PhD, Lecturer at Faculty of Arts, University of Calabar Calabar, Cross River, Nigeria. Interested in Development and Pedagogical Theatre especial in the use of diverse methodologies.

References

  1. Abah, Steve, Okwori, Jenkeri. 2009. “Participatory theatre and video: Acting against violence in Northern Nigeria.” IDS Bulletin 40 (3): 19-26.
  2. Allagbe, Ayodele and Franck Ammousu. 2018. “Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis.” International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature 6(1): 11-18. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/23473134.0601002).
  3. Allman, Dan. 2013. “The sociology of Social-Inclusion.” SAGE Open 3(1): 1-16. DOI: 1177/2158244012471957.
  4. Akpan, Aniette. 2015. “Skolombo, the Story of Calabar Street Children.” Sunday Magazine-The Guardian Nigerian Newspaper-Nigeria and World News. Retrieved June 11, 2018 (https://guardian_ng/sunday-magazine/skolombo-the story-of-calabar-street-children/).
  5. Amos, Patricia. 2013. “Parenting and Culture – Evidence from Some African Communities.” IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/56967.
  6. Chojnacka, Barbara. 2018. “Destructive sense of responsibility in individuals with experience of parentification: A biographical perspective.” Pp 33-39 in Social Pedagogy and Social Education: Bridging Traditions and Innovations Social Pedagogy Association, edited by D. Keller, K. O’Neil, H. Nicolaisen, D. Schugurensky, and K. Villaseñor. Phoenix, Arizona.
  7. Cioban, Smaranda. 2018. “Exploring how Children Perceive their Work, Case Study Salaj County, Romania.” Pp. 79-118 in Children and Youth in varied Socio-Cultural Contexts: Theory, Research, Praxis, edited by U. Markowska-Manista. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
  8. Dijk, Teun. 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis. USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  9. Engelhardt, Jennifer. 2012. “The Developmental Implications of Parentification: Effects on Childhood Attachment.” Graduate Student Journal of Psychology 14: 45-52.
  10. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical discourse analysis.” Pp. 258–84 in Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by T. Dijk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Geertz, Clifford. 1975. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books Inc.
  12. Gidley, Jennifer, Hampson, Gary, Wheeler, Leone & Bereded-Samuel, E. 2010. “Social Inclusion: Co text, Theory and Practice.” The Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement 5(1):6-36.
  13. Goonesekere, Savitri and Alwis Rangita. 2005. Women’s and children’s rights in a human rights based approach to development. New York: UNICEF.
  14. Guba, Egon, & Yvonna Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  15. Guest, Greg, Emily E. Namey and Marilyn L. Mitchell. 2013. “Participant Observation.” Pp. 75-112 in Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research, edited by G. Guest, E. E. Namey and M. L. Mitchell. Retrieved January 22, 2019 (https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/48454_ch_3.pdf).
  16. Hamzaj, Enkelejda. 2015. “Jurgen Habermas and the critical theory of the society.” WEI International academic conference proceedings. Retrieved October 4, 2019
  17. (http://westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Enkelejda-Hamzaj.pdf).
  18. Kumar, Chinta. 2013. “The eclectic method-Theory and its application to the learning of English language.” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3(6): 1-4.
  19. Lamont, Corliss. 1997 [1949]. The Philosophy of Humanism. 8th Ed. Amherst, New York: Humanist Press.
  20. Louai, Habib. 2012. “Retracing the concept of the subaltern from Gramsci to Spivak: Historical developments and new applications.” African journal of history and culture 4(1): 4-8. DOI: 10.5897/AJHC11.020.
  21. Mehta, Neeta. 2019. “Parentification: A Disguised Form of “Child Labour.” in the Family System.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) (8): 8-11.
  22. Odrowaz-Coates, Anna. 2017. “Revisiting Power and Supremacy in the Post-Colonial World. Globalisation as a Refined Phase of Colonization.” Pp. 13-23 in Symbolic Violence in Socio-Economic Contexts: A Post-colonial Critique, edited by A. Odrowaz-Coates and G. Sribas. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
  23. Okam, Chinyere Lilian. 2014. “Theatre for Development as Participatory Evaluation Methodology.” in A study of the Millennium Village Project, Pampaida-Nigeria. An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria-Nigeria.
  24. Okam, Chinyere, Lilian. 2019. “A pedagogic complexus on the knowledge and impact of economic recession on secondary school students.” International Journal of Pedagogy Innovation and New Technologies 6(1): 37-44.
  25. Onuekwe, C. E and Okam Chinyere, Lilian 2017. “Gender Disparity and Psycho-sexual Violence: An X-ray of How Imbalance is perpetuated by Sexual Behavior.” Journal of Gender and Power. Faculty of Educational Studies 8(2): 35-54.
  26. Ozumba, G. O. 2010. Philosophy of Integrative Humanism. Calabar, Nigeria: Joschrisam Publishers.
  27. Ozumba, G.O. and Chimakonam J.O. 2014. Njikoka Amaka: Further Discussions on the Philosophy of Integrative Humanism. Logic Option Publishing, Calabar. Print.
  28. Partnership Initiative in the Niger Delta (PIND) Briefing. 2017. “The Street Kids of Calabar: A Punitive Approach is Not Enough.” Retrieved January 22, 2019 (https://fundforpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PIND-Briefing-TheStreet-Kids-of-Calabar-February-2017.pdf).
  29. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Sen, Amartya. 2000. “Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny.” Social Development Papers 1. Office of Environment and Social Development Asian Development. Bank, June. 2000. Social Exclusion. Retrieved January 22, 2019 (https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29778/social-exclusion.pdf).
  31. Shortall, Sally and Mark Shucksmith. 1998. “Integrated Rural Development: Issues arising.” The Scottish Experience. European Planning Studies 6(1): 73-88.
  32. Spivak, Gyatari. 1988. “Can the subaltern speak?” Pp. 271-313, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Urbana,Chicago: University of Ilinois Press.
  33. Zakir, A., Abubakar, U., Lawal, U.S., Imrana, H., Habibu, I. T., Hassan, I. H., and Harande M. M. 2014. “The practice of Almajiri: Prospect and socio-medical Challenges in Northern Part of Nigeria.” Journal of African Studies and Development 6(7): 128- 131. DOI: 10.5897/JASD20014.0273.