Faculty approaches to diversity in Eastern European education: implications for teaching sensitive topics

Main Article Content

Margaryta Rymarenko
Jekatyerina Dunajeva

Abstract

This article analyses the concept of diversity in education in the context of Eastern Europe, and how its meaning might differ from that used in Western-focused literature. The study explores the ways in which faculty interpret diversity based on their experience of teaching contexts as being homogenous, situational, or internationalized, for which interviews have been conducted with university educators in Eastern Europe. In a phenomenographic analysis, three different approaches to how teachers engage with diversity in the classroom were identified: (1) exposing students to diversity as an external phenomenon through teaching; (2) focusing on the diversities among students in a given classroom and learning how to navigate them; (3) using the diversities present in the classroom to facilitate inclusive teaching and learning. We argue that the meanings and intentions associated with the understanding of diversity are constitutive of how faculty see their role in facilitating student learning in diverse classroom, and especially of their strategies to address sensitive and controversial topics. Finally, we discuss the implications for teaching practice and academic development, in addition to the relevance of diversity in Eastern European classrooms.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rymarenko, M., & Dunajeva, J. (2022). Faculty approaches to diversity in Eastern European education: implications for teaching sensitive topics. Society Register, 6(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.1.07
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Margaryta Rymarenko, Central European University

Margaryta Rymarenko is an independent education consultant and researcher. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Teaching and Learning, Central European University, Austria.

Jekatyerina Dunajeva, Central European University

Jekatyerina Dunajeva is a SensiClass researcher at Central European University and assistant professor at Pazmany Peter Catholic University in Budapest, Hungary.

References

  1. Andrushchenko, Victor & Galyna Nesterenko. 2015. “Values discourse of diversity education: Dialogue of Eastern and Western European countries.” Pp. 25-40 in Inclusive Education in Different East and West European Countries, edited by Diana Soulber. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/project-resultcontent/34cd5e51-7598-49e1-a1bd-4e50fdeba30b/Inclusive%20Education%20in%20Different%20East%20and%20West%20European%20Countries.pdf
  2. Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2004. “A new dimension to understanding university teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 9(3): 363-75. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216679
  3. Åkerlind, Gerlese S. 2007. “Constraints on Academics’ Potential for Developing as a Teacher.” Studies in Higher Education 32(1): 21-37. doi: 10.1080/03075070601099416
  4. Ashwin, Paul. 2006. “Variation in academics’ accounts of tutorials.” Studies in Higher Education 31(6): 651-65. doi: 10.1080/03075070601004234
  5. Balint, Mária, Mihály Gubi, & Otto Mihaly. 1980. A polgári nevelés radikális alternatívái [Radical alternatives of the middle-class pedagogy]. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
  6. Berg, Carin & Lazãr Vlãsceanu. 1991. “The Europeanization of Higher Education: Integration and Diversity as Viewed from Eastern Europe.” Higher Education in Europe 16(4): 4-17. doi.org/10.1080/0379772910160402
  7. Berkes, Lilla. 2010. “The Development and Meaning of the Concept of Multiculturalism.” International Relations Quarterly 1(4): 1-6.
  8. Boeije, Hennie. 2002. “A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews.” Quality and Quantity 36: 391-409. doi: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
  9. Claeys-Kulik, Anna-Lena, Tomas E. Jørgensen, & Henriette Stöber. 2019. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in European Higher Education Institutions. Results from the INVITED project. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/web_diversity%20equity%20and%20inclusion%20in%20european%20higher%20education%20institutions.pdf).
  10. Csereklye, Erzsebet. 2014. “Multiculturalism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Hungarian story.” Multicultural Education Review 6(1): 102-127.
  11. Dorner, Helga, Gorana Misic, & Margaryta Rymarenko. 2021. “Online Mentoring for Academic Practice: Strategies, Implications, and Innovations.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1483(1): 98-111. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14301
  12. Dorner, Helga & Jelena Belic. 2021. “From an Individual to an Institution: Observations about the Evolutionary Nature of Conversations.” International Journal for Academic Development 26(3): 210-23. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2021.1947295
  13. Fox, Dennis. 1983. “Personal Theories of Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 8(2): 151-163. doi: 10.1080/03075078312331379014
  14. González, Carlos. 2011. “Extending Research on ‘Conceptions of Teaching’: Commonalities and Differences in Recent Investigations.” Teaching in Higher Education 16(1): 65-80. doi: 10.26466/opus.792272
  15. Holmes, Stephen & Ivan Krastev. 2019. “Explaining Eastern Europe: Imitation and its discontents.” Eurozine. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.eurozine.com/explaining-eastern-europe/).
  16. Kürti, László. 2020. “Orbánism: The Culture of Illiberalism in Hungary.” Ethnologia Europaea 50(2): 62-79. doi: 10.16995/ee.1055
  17. Kerr, Clark. 1990. “The Internationalization of Learning and the Nationalization of the Purposes of Higher Education: Two ‘Laws of Motion’ in Conflict?” European Journal of Education 25(1): 5-22. doi: 10.2307/1502702
  18. Korhonen, Vesa & Markus Weil. 2015. “The Internationalisation of Higher Education: Perspectives on Self-Conceptions in Teaching.” Journal of Research in International Education 14(3): 198-212. doi:10.1177/1475240915615447
  19. Kreber Carolin. 2010. “Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 35(2): 171-194. doi: 10.1080/03075070902953048
  20. Marton, Ference & Wing Y. Pong. 2005. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development 24(4): 335-48. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284706
  21. Pew Research Center. 2018. Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.pewforum.org/2018/10/29/eastern-and-western-europeans-differ-on-importance-of-religion-views-of-minorities-and-key-social-issues/).
  22. Prosser, Michael & Keith Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  23. Roche, Lawrence A. & Herbert W. Marsh. 2002. “Teaching self-concept in higher education. Reflecting on multiple dimensions of teaching effectiveness.” Pp. 179-218 in Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education, edited by N. Hativa & P. Goodyear. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  24. Rutakumwa, Rutakumwa, Joseph O. Mugisha, Sarah Bernays, Elizabeth Kabunga, Grace Tumwekwase, Martin Mbonye, & Janet Seeley. 2020. “Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis.” Qualitative Research 20(5): 565581. doi: 10.1177/1468794119884806
  25. Scherle, Dana A. & Daniel Heinrich. 2017. “Turkey, Hungary and Poland: The politics of school textbooks.” DW. Retrieved February 17, 2022 (https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-hungary-and-poland-the-politics-of-school-textbooks/a-41032191).