Extremism in a classroom: topics discussed and Estonian teachers' experiences and self-reflective choices

Main Article Content

Heidi Maiberg
Alar Kilp

Abstract

Violent acts motivated by extreme interpretations of ideologies (right-wing, left-wing, religions, etc.) catch a lot of attention and cause serious deep emotions such as fear, hate, uncertainty, support polarization of society, and stigmatization of certain people, things, and societal groups. However, little attention has been given to how educators have addressed issues of violent radicalisation, extremism and terrorism with their students. According to Vallinkoski et al., 2021 as schools are one of the primary settings where most children spend their time, educators are needed to help children foster these (critical media reading and interpreting skills) skills to support students in understanding the reasons behind and aftermath of extremist events.


This article gives overview of the results of a pilot study focusing on Estonian educators' experiences with discussing and tackling extremism in a classroom. The study examines educators' experiences in discussing topics related to extremism with students and colleagues and an overview of topics that students have raised. It also answers whether educators self-censorship themselves in discussing topics related to extremism and if so, what are the reasons for doing that. The study's questionnaire is created based on a similar study conducted in Finland by Vallinkoski, Koirikivi and Malkki (2021) with the permission of the authors and with adaptions for the Estonian context. The study results show that Estonian teachers discuss the extremism-related context in classroom by their and students' initiative. While doing it, they face difficulties in defining 'extremism', understanding how to interpret the students reactions and ideas, and when to contact further counterparts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maiberg, H., & Kilp, A. (2022). Extremism in a classroom: topics discussed and Estonian teachers’ experiences and self-reflective choices . Society Register, 6(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.1.06
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Heidi Maiberg, Royal Holloway, University of London

Heidi Maiberg is a PhD student at Royal Holloway, University of London, focusing on deradicalisation and disengagement of extremists and an employee of the University of Tartu. In her dissertation, she investigates the impact of the methods currently used to support deradicalisation and disengagement. She also researches developments of Estonian and Baltic right-wing milieu, and ways how education can support prevention of extremism. Her PhD is funded by Estonian Education and Youth Board through Kristjan Jaak scholarship. Previously, she has been a project manager in the third sector, head research assistant in several research at a project funded by CREST, worked at the Estonian Ministry of the Interior, and as a teacher of history, societal and religious studies. 

 

Alar Kilp, University of Tartu

Alar Kilp (PhD, 2012 in political science) has been a lecturer in Comparative Politics at the University of Tartu (Estonia) since 2004. His research specializes in religion and politics, comparative politics, scholarship of teaching and learning in Political Science. He has co-edited a special issue on ‘Religion, the Russian Nation and the State: Domestic and International Dimensions’ (Religion, State and Society 2013) and published articles in Religion, State and Society, Studies in Church History and Proceedings of Estonian National Defence College. His recent papers on religious nationalism, European normative power, religion and soft power, religious authority, Euro-secularism and legal regulation of same-sex relations have appeared in volumes published by Brill and Routledge. In Estonian academic journals he has published articles on feedback papers as a means of learning-centered teaching, democratic education and scholarly teaching. In international conferences he has presented papers on discussion-based teaching and teaching threshold concepts in Political Science.

 

References

  1. Ackerman, Gary A., & Michael Burnham. 2021. “Towards a Definition of Terrorist Ideology.” Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(6), 1160–1190. DOI:10.1080/09546553.2019.1599862.
  2. Andersson, Erik. 2016. “Producing and Consuming the Controversial – A Social Media Perspective on Political Conversations in the Social Science Classroom.” Journal of Social Science Education, 15(1), 6–16. DOI: 10.4119/jsse-773.
  3. Arthur, James. 2015. “Extremism and Neo-Liberal Education Policy: A Contextual Critique of the Trojan Horse Affair in Birmingham Schools.” British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 311–328. DOI:10.1080/00071005.2015.1069258.
  4. Bonnell, Joe, Phil Copestake, David Kerr, Rowena Passy, Chris Reed, Rachel Salter, Shama Sarwar, & Sanah Sheikh. “Teaching Approaches that help to build resilience to extremism among young people.” OPM and National Foundation for Educational Research, 11 May 2010, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182675/DFE-RR119.pdf
  5. Braun, Virginia, & Victoria Clarke. 2021. “One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
  6. Braun, Virginia, & Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  7. Braun, Virginia, & Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  8. Chamlee-Wright, Emily. 2019. “Self-Censorship and Associational Life in the Liberal Academy.” Society, 56 (6), 538–549. DOI:10.1007/s12115-019-00413-1.
  9. Davies, Lynn, & Zubeda Limbada. 2019. “Education and radicalisation prevention: Different ways governments can support schools and teachers in preventing/countering violent extremism.” Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN), 06 May. https://www.connectfutures.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ran_edu_different_ways_governments_can_support_schools_teachers_052019_en.pdf.
  10. Davies, Lynn. 2008. “Gender, education, extremism and security.” Compare, 38(5), 611–625. DOI:10.1080/03057920802351432.
  11. Davies, Lynn. 2009. “Educating Against Extremism: Towards a Critical Politicisation of Young People.” International Review of Education, 55(2-3), 183–203. DOI:10.1007/s11159-008-9126-8.
  12. Davies, Lynn. 2018. “Review of Educational Initiatives in Counter-Extremism Internationally: What Works?” The Segerstedt Institute, University of Gothenburg. Report 5. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2021-09/report5.pdf.
  13. Davies, Lynn. 2021. “Interrupting Hate Before It Starts.” Pp. 95-108 in Disuprting Hate in Education: Teacher Activists, Democracy, and Global Pedagogies of Interruption, edited by Rita Verma, & Michael W. Apple. New York and London: Routledge.
  14. ERR. 2017. “Kohus kaalub islamiterrorismi toetaja vanglast vabastamist.” 01 June, https://www.err.ee/599503/kohus-kaalub-islamiterrorismi-toetaja-vanglast-va-bastamist
  15. Falkenbach, Michelle, & Scott L. Greer (eds.) 2021. The Populist Radical Right and Health: National Policies and Global Trends. Cham: Springer.
  16. Fautré, Willy. 2020. “Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia: Legal Measures.” The Journal of CESNUR, 4(6), 41–57. DOI: 10.26338/tjoc.2020.4.6.4.
  17. Gielen, Amy-Jane. 2019. “Countering Violent Extremism: A Realist Review for Assessing What Works, for Whom, in What Circumstances, and How?” Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(6), 1149–1167. DOI:10.1080/09546553.2017.1313736.
  18. Hess, Diana E. 2005. “How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues?” Social Education, 69(1), 47–48.
  19. Jerome, Lee & Alex Elwick. 2020. “Teaching about terrorism, extremism and radicalisation: some implications for controversial issues pedagogy.” Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 222–237. DOI:10.1080/03054985.2019.1667318.
  20. Jerome, Lee, & Alex Elwick. 2019. “Identifying an Educational Response to the Prevent Policy: Student Perspectives on Learning about Terrorism, Extremism and Radicalisation.” British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(1), 97–114. DOI:10.1080/00071005.2017.1415295.
  21. Kello, Katrin. 2016. “Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: Teaching history in a divided society.” Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35–53. DOI:10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027.
  22. Kilp, Alar, & Heidi Maiberg. Forthcoming. “Preparedness of Estonian Teachers to Tackle Extremism in a Classroom: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies published in Estonian Journal of Education (2013–2021).” Manuscript accepted for publication in a volume (Bloomsbury) edited by Katarzyna Górak-Sosnowska
  23. and Urszula Markowska-Manista.
  24. Kolstø, Pål. 2016. “Symbol of the War—But Which One? The St George Ribbon in Russian Nation-Building.” Slavonic & East European Review, 94(4), 660–701. DOI:10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.94.4.0660.
  25. Laruelle, Marlene. 2021. Is Russia Fascist? Unraveling Propaganda East and West. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  26. Maasing, Helina, & Sander Salvet. 2018. Äärmuslik vägivald ja radikaliseerumine koolis – 10 vastust, mida õpetaja peab teadma. RITA-ränne projekt 2018. https://sisu.ut.ee/sites/default/files/ranne/files/maasing_ja_salvet_2020_aarmuslik_vagivald_ja_radikaliseerumine_koolis_juhend_opetajatele.pdf
  27. Malkki, Leena. 2020. “Radicalisation – myths and research findings.” Pp. 14-18 in Building Resilience – in Support of Democracy Education. Finnish National Agency for Education, www.edu.fi.
  28. Mercer, Mark. 2021. “Self-Censorship and the Academic Mission.” Academic Questions, 34(2), 74-80.
  29. Misco, Thomas. 2011. “Teaching about controversial issues: Rationale, practice, and need for inquiry.” International Journal for Education Law and Policy, (1-2), 13–24.
  30. Mudde, Cas. 2016. On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
  31. Nahkur, Oliver, & Helina Maasing. (2020). Etniliste konfliktide ja radikaliseerumise ennetamise soovitusi koolidele. RITA-ränne projekt 2020. https://sisu.ut.ee/sites/
  32. default/files/ranne/files/konfliktide_ja_radikaliseerumise_ennetamise_soovitused_koolidele.pdf
  33. Niemi, Pia-Maria, Saija Benjami, Arniika Kuusisto, & Liam Gearon. 2018. “How and why education counters ideological extremism in Finland.” Religions, 9(12): 420–435. DOI: 10.3390/rel9120420.
  34. Onursal, Recep, & Daniel Kirkpatrick. 2021. “Is Extremism the ‘New’ Terrorism? the Convergence of ‘Extremism’ and ‘Terrorism’ in British Parliamentary Discourse.” Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(5), 1094–1116. DOI:10.1080/09546553.2019.1598391.
  35. Pavlova, Jekaterina. 2022. “Radikaaliks tunnistatud mees jätkab kohtuvõitlust Eestisse naasmiseks.” 13 January, https://www.postimees.ee/7428846/radikaaliks-tunnistatud-mees-jatkab-kohtuvoitlust-eestisse-naasmiseks
  36. Raudsepp, Maaris, & Anna Zadora. 2019. “The sensitive scars of the second world war in teaching European history.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(1), 87–110. DOI:10.1080/14681366.2019.1566270.
  37. Rosvall, Per-Åke, & Elisabet Öhrn. 2014. “Teachers’ silences about racist attitudes and students’ desires to address these attitudes.” Intercultural Education, 25(5), 337–348. DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2014.967972.
  38. Salu, Mikk. 2020. “Kes on Komandör? Kapo tabas vägivaldse natsioorganisatsiooni eestlasest juhi.” https://ekspress.delfi.ee/artikkel/89488391/kes-on-komandor-kapo-tabas-vagivaldse-natsiorganisatsiooni-eestlasest-juhi
  39. Salu, Mikk. 2021. “Kohtutoimik paljastab: vägivaldsest ideoloogiast vaimustunud neonatsid püüavad EKRE Sinisesse Äratusse imbuda.” Eesti Ekspress, 03 March. https://ekspress.delfi.ee/artikkel/92962993/suur-lugu-kohtutoimik-paljastab-vagivaldsest-ideoloogiast-vaimustunud-neonatsid-puuavad-ekre-sinisesse-
  40. aratusse-imbuda.
  41. Savenije, Geerte M., & Tsafrir Goldberg. 2019. “Silences in a climate of voicing: teachers’ perceptions of societal and self-silencing regarding sensitive historical issues.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(1), 39–64. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2019.1566162
  42. Sukarieh, Mayssoun, & Stuart Tannock. 2016. “The deradicalisation of education: terror, youth and the assault on learning.” Race & Class, 57(4), 22–38. DOI: 10.1177/0306396815621236.
  43. UNESCO. 2016. A Teacher’s Guide on the prevention of Violent Extremism. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000244676_eng
  44. Vallinkoski, Katja, Pia-Maria Koirikivi, & Leena Malkki. 2021. “What is this ISIS all about?’Addressing violent extremism with students: Finnish educators’ perspectives.” European Educational Research Journal. DOI:14749041211010074.
  45. Vergani, Matteo, Muhammad Iqbal, Ekin Ilbahar, & Greg Barton. 2020. “The Three Ps of Radicalization: Push, Pull and Personal. A Systematic Scoping Review of the Scientific Evidence about Radicalization Into Violent Extremism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(10), 854–885. DOI:10.1080/1057610X.2018.1505686.
  46. Viilma, Urmas. 2018. “Usundiõpetuse puudumine ajab eestlased esoteerika rüppe.” ERR News, 13 November. https://www.err.ee/876591/urmas-viilma-usundiope-tuse-puudumine-ajab-eestlased-esoteerika-ruppe
  47. Wansink, Bjorn, Beatrice de Graaf, & Elke Berghuis. 2021. “Teaching under attack: The dilemmas, goals, and practices of upper-elementary school teachers when dealing with terrorism in class.” Theory & Research in Social Education. DOI:10.1080/00933104.2021.1920523.