In search of phonotactic preferences

Main Article Content

Paula Orzechowska

Abstract

The objective of this contribution is to provide an analysis of consonant clusters based on the assumption that phonotactic preferences are encoded in phonological features of individual segments forming a cluster. This encoding is expressed by a set of parameters established for the following features: complexity, place of articulation, manner of articulation and voicing. On the basis of empirically observed tendencies of feature distribution and co-occurrence, novel phonotactic preferences for English word-initial consonant clusters are proposed. Statistical methods allow us to weigh the preferences and determine a ranking of phonological features in cluster formation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Orzechowska, P. (2016). In search of phonotactic preferences. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 2(1), 197-195. https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2016-0008
Section
Articles

References

  1. Clements, G.N. 1985. “The geometry of phonological features”. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.
  2. Clements, G.N. 1990. “The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabifcation”. In: Kingston, J. and M.E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: CUP. 283–333.
  3. Dresher, B.E. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2009. “NP extension: B&B phonotactics”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(1). 55–71.
  5. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2014. “Explaining phonotactics using NAD”. Language Sciences 46. 6–17.
  6. Gimson, A.C. 2014. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. (8th ed.) London: Edward Arnold.
  7. Goad, H. 2011. “The representation of sC clusters”. In: van Oostendorp, M., C. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 898–923.
  8. Goad, H. 2012. “sC Clusters are (almost always) coda-initial”. The Linguistic Review 29(3). 335–373.
  9. Goldsmith J.A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phrenology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  10. Greenberg, J.H. 1978. “Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters”. In: Greenberg, J.H. (ed.), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 243–279.
  11. Hayes, B. 1989. “Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology”. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253–306.
  12. Hall, T.A. 1997. The phonology of coronals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  13. Harris, J. 1990. “Segmental complexity and phonological government”. Phonology Yearbook 7. 255–300.
  14. Hoole, P., ‎L. Bombien, M. Pouplier, C. Mooshammer and B. Kühnert (eds.). 2012. Consonant clusters and structural complexity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  15. Hyman, L. 1977. “On the nature of linguistic stress”. In: Hyman, L. (ed.), Studies in stress and accent. (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.) Los Angeles: USC Department of Linguistics. 37–82.
  16. Jespersen, O. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. (2nd ed.) Leipzig, Berlin: Teubner.
  17. Jones, D. 2011. Cambridge English pronouncing dictionary. (18th ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Ladefoged, P. 2011. A course in phonetics. Boston: Thomson Higher Education.
  19. Leben, W. R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)
  20. Kaye, J. 1992. “Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences”. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 293–313.
  21. Kaye, J., J. Lowenstamm and J-R. Vergnaud. 1990. “Constituent structure and government in phonology”. Phonology 7. 193–231.
  22. Maddieson, I. 2011. “Syllable structure”. In: Dryer, M. and M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Plank Digital Library. <http://wals.info/>.
  23. McCarthy, J.J. 1986. “OCP effects: gemination and antigemmination”. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 207–263.
  24. Morelli, F. 1999. The phonotactics and phonology of obstruent clusters in Optimality Theory. (PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.)
  25. Orzechowska, P. and R. Wiese. 2011. “Reconstructing the sonority hierarchy”. Proceedings of ICPhS 2011, Hong Kong.
  26. Orzechowska, P. and R. Wiese. 2015. “Preferences and variation in word-initial phonotactics: A multi-dimensional evaluation of German and Polish”. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 439–486.
  27. Paradis, C. and J-F. Prunet (eds.). 1991. The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.
  28. Parker, S. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. (PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.)
  29. R Core Team. 2015. The R project for Statistical Computing. <http://www.R-project.org/>.
  30. Roach, P. 2004. “British English: Received Pronunciation”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34(2). 239–245.
  31. Roach, P. 2006. English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Rochoń, M. 2000. Optimality in complexity: The case of Polish consonant clusters. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
  33. Selkirk, E.O. 1984. “On the major class features and syllable theory”. In: Aronof, M. and R.T. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 107–136.
  34. Steriade, D. 1982 Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)
  35. Trnka, B. 1966. A phonological analysis of present-day standard English. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
  36. Vennemann, T. 1988. Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
  37. Wells, J.C. 2009. Longman pronunciation dictionary. (3rd ed.) London: Pearson.
  38. Wiese, R. 1988. Silbische und Lexikalische Phonologie. Studien zum Chinesischen und Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  39. Zec, D. 1995. “Sonority constraints on syllable structure”. Phonology 12. 85–129.