Language change and morphological processes

Main Article Content

Camiel Hamans

Abstract

Morphological change is not a result of mechanical, predictable processes, but of the behavior of language users. Speakers reinterpret opaque data in order to assign a more transparent structure to them. Subsequently successful reinterpretation may form the basis of new derivations. The moment such a derivative word formation process becomes productive a language change has taken place.


In addition, this paper shows how language change obscures the distinction between separate morphological processes such as compounding and derivation and thus between morphological categories. Moreover, the data under discussion show that there is not a preferred natural direction of language change. Most of the examples are taken from English and Dutch, but also a few French, Frisian, German and Afrikaans data are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamans, C. (2017). Language change and morphological processes. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2017-0001
Section
Articles

References

  1. Adams, V. 1973. An introduction to Modern English word-formation. London: Long-man.
  2. Bauer, L. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Bauer, L. 2004. “The borderline between derivation and compounding”. In: Dressler, W.U., D. Kastovsky, O.E. Pfeiffer and F. Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its de-marcations. Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 97–108.
  4. Bauer, L. 2014. “Concatenative derivation”. In: Lieber, R. and P. Štekauer (eds.), Deri-vational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 118–135.
  5. Bauer, L., R. Lieber and I. Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphol-ogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Booij, G. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Booij, G. 2012. The grammar of words. An introduction to linguistic morphology. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Booij, G. and M. Hüning. 2014. “Affixoids and constructional idioms”. In: Boogaart, R., T. Colleman and G. Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Gram-mar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 77–106.
  9. Donalies, E. 2000. “Das Konfix. Zur Definition einer zentralen Einheit der deutschen Wortbildung”. Deutsche Sprache 28. 144–159.
  10. Donalies, E. 2002. Die Wortbildung des Deutschen. Ein Überblick. Tübingen: Narr.
  11. Elsen, H. 2005. “Deutsche Konfixe”. Deutsche Sprache 33. 133–140.
  12. Elsen, H. 2011. Grundzüge der Morphologie des Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  13. Hamans, C. 1988. “De overeenkomst tussen literama en actreutel. Zabrocki‘s diacrise als oplossing voor enige klassieke morfologische problemen”. Spektator 17. 289–299.
  14. Hamans, C. 1993. “Van epicentrum tot episch centrum: enige notities over distinctieve morfologie”. Tabu 23. 63–73.
  15. Hamans, C. 2010. “The productivity of blending: linguistic or cognitive? Or how to deal with administrivia and ostalgia”. In: Stanulewicz, D., T.Z. Wolański and J. Re-dzim¬ska (eds.), Lingua Terra Cognita II. A Festschrift for professor Roman Kalisz. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. 467–490.
  16. Hamans, C. 2014. “What makes a blend – a reading report and some observations”. In: Kleparski, G.A., E. Konieczna and B. Kopecka (eds.), Linguistics and methodolo-gy. (The Subcarpathian studies in English language, literature and culture. Vol. 1.) Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. 240–256.
  17. Hamans, C. Submitted. “Between stub compounds and blends”.
  18. Hamans, C. Forthcoming. “The superiorty of the right part. About syllabic and prosodic characteristics of blends”.
  19. Hamans, C., J. Fisiak and E.H. Jahr. 2009. “Degrammaticalization and reanalysis”. In: Łobacz, P., P. Nowak and W. Zabrocki (eds.), Language, science and culture. Es-says in honor of Professor Jerzy Bańczerowski on the occasion of his 70th birthday Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. 145–168.
  20. Haspelmath, M. 2004. “On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization”. In: Fischer, O., M. Norde and H. Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – The nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–44.
  21. Heine, B., U. Claudi and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual frame¬work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Hopper, P.J. and E. Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Hüning, M. 1993. “Visies op taalverandering”. Forum der Letteren 34(4). 281–302.
  24. Jespersen, O. 1928. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. (Part VI: Mor-phology.) London: Allen & Unwin.
  25. Keller, R. 1994. Sprachwandel. Tübingen: Francke.
  26. Lass, R. 1990. “How to do with junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26(1). 79–102.
  27. Lehmann, C. 1989. “Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42. 11–19.
  28. Lehrer, A. 1996. “Identifying and interpreting blends: An experimental approach”. Cognitive Linguistics 7(4). 359–390.
  29. Maiden, M. 2008. “Effects of word-formation processes in Italian. Reflections on Ma-ria Grossmann and Franz Rainer (Eds) 2004. La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer”. Rivista di Linguistica 20(2). 375–400.
  30. Maciuszak, K. 2008. “The Persian suffix -(e)stan ‘the land of’”. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 13. 119–140.
  31. Marchand, H. 1969. The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation. München: Beck.
  32. Mattiello, E. 2013. Extragrammatical morphology in English. Abbreviations, blends, re-duplicatives and related phenomena. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  33. Mattiello, E. 2017. Analogy in word-formation. A study of English neologisms and occa-sionalisms. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  34. Meesters, G. 2002. Marginale morfologie in het Nederlands: paradigmatische samen-stellingen, neoklassieke composita en splintercomposita. (PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.)
  35. Norde, M. 2006. “Van suffix tot telwoord tot bijwoord: Degrammaticalisering en (re)grammaticalisering van tig”. Tabu 35. 33–60.
  36. Norde, M. and K. Van Goethem. 2015. “Emancipatie van affixen en affixoïden: de-grammaticalisatie of lexicalisatie?” Nederlandse Taalkunde 20. 109–148.
  37. Olsen, S. 2014. “Delineating derivation and compounding”. In: Lieber, R. and P. Štekauer (eds.), Derivational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 26–49.
  38. Plag, I. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Schmid, H.U. 1998. -lîh-Bildungen: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Herkunft, Ent-wicklung und Funktion eines althochdeutschen Suffixes. Göttingen: Vandenhoekc & Ruprecht.
  40. Ramat, P. 2001. “Degrammaticalization or transcategorization?” In: Schaner-Wolles, C., J. Rennison and F. Neubarth (eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolf-gang Ulrich Dressler. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier. 393–401.
  41. Schuchardt, H. 1922. In: Spitzer, L. (ed.), Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier. Halle: Max Nie-meyer.
  42. Van Goethem, K. 2008. “Oud-leerling versus ancient élève: A comparative study of ad-jectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French”. Morphology 18(1). 27–49.
  43. Van Goethem, K. and H. De Smet. 2014. “How nouns turn into adjectives. The emer-gence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding process-es”. Languages in Contrast 14(2). 251–277.
  44. Van den Toorn, M.C. 1983. “Morfeemsplinters”. Gramma 7. 81–85.
  45. Warren, B. 1990. “The importance of combining forms”. In: Dressler, W.U., H.C. Lus-chützky, O.E. Pfeiffer and J.R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary morphology. Ber-lin: Mouton de Gruyter. 111–132.
  46. Zabrocki, L. 1969. “Phonologie und distinctive Morphologie”. In: Graur, A. (ed.), Actes du Xe Congrès International des Linguistes Bucarest 1967. Bucarest: Editions de l’Académie de la République socialiste de Roumanie. 367–375. (Also in Zabrocki (1980). 105–112.)
  47. Zabrocki, L. 1980. U podstaw struktury i rozwoju języka [At the foundation of lan-guage structure and development]. Warszawa/Poznań: Państowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  48. Zwicky, A. 2010. Libfixes. <http://arnoldzwicky.org/2010/01/23/libfixes/>