Abstract
By considering a specific scenario of early language evolution, here I advocate taking into account one of the most obvious players in the evolution of human language capacity: (sexual) selection. The proposal is based both on an internal reconstruction using syntactic theory, and on comparative typological evidence, directly bringing together, formal, typological, and evolutionary considerations. As one possible test case, transitivity is decomposed into evolutionary primitives of syntactic structure, revealing a common denominator and the building blocks for crosslinguistic variation in transitivity. The approximations of this early grammar, identified by such a reconstruction, while not identical constructs, are at least as good proxies of the earliest stages of grammar as one can find among tools, cave paintings, or bird song. One subtype of such “living fossils” interacts directly with biological considerations of survival, aggression, and mate choice, while others clearly distinguish themselves in fMRI experiments. The fMRI findings are consistent with the proposal that the pressures to be able to master ever more and more complex syntax were at least partly responsible for driving the selection processes which gradually increased the connectivity of the Broca’s-basal ganglia network, crucial for syntactic processing, among other important functions.
References
Aboh, E. 2009. Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry 40.1–33.
Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ardila, A., B. Bernal and M. Rosselli. 2016. Why Broca’s area damage does not re-sult in classical Broca’s aphasia? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
Baker, M. C. and N. Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of Case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28. 593–642.
Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi. 2000. An interview on minimalism, with Noam Chomsky. The University of Siena, November 8–9, 1999. Revised 16 Mar 2000.<http://www.media.unisi.it/ciscl/pubblicazioni.htm>
Bergen, B. K. 2016. What the F: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
Berwick, R. and N. Chomsky. 2011. The biolinguistic program. The current state of its development. In A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic en-terprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R. and N. Chomsky. 2016. Why only us? Language and evolution. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bickerton, D. 2007. Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists. Lingua 117. 510–526.
Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understand-ing the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neurosci-ence 25. 151–188.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2002. On nature and language. (Edited by Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Citko, B. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, Move, and labels. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Darwin, C. M. A. 1874. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. (New edition.) New York: Hurst and Company.
Deacon, T. W. 2003. Multilevel selection in a complex adaptive system: The problem of language origins. In W. H. Bruce and D. J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. (A Bradford Book.) 81–106. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dediu, D. 2015. An Introduction to genetics for language scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.
Fitch, W. T. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fitch, W. T. 2017a. Preface to the special issue on the biology and evolution of lan-guage. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 24. 1–2.
Fitch, W. T. 2017b. Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution. Psy-chonomic Bulletin Review 24. 3–33.
Franks, B. and K. Rigby. 2005. Deception and mate selection: Some implications for relevance and the evolution of language. In M. Tallerman (ed.), Language ori-gins: Perspectives on evolution. 208–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gleeson, B.T. 2018. Masculinity and the mechanisms of human self-domestication. BioRxiv preprint.
Greenfield, P. M. and S. Savage-Rumbaugh. 1990. Language and intelligence in monkeys and apes. In S. T. Parker and K. R. Gibson (eds.), Grammatical com-bination in Pan paniscus: Process of learning and invention in the evolution and development of language. 540–579. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hare, B., V. Wobber and R. Wrangham. 2012. The self-domestication hypothesis: Evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Animal Behavior 83(3). 573–585.
Harris, E. E. 2015. Ancestors in our genome: The new science of human evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar. A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, A. K., D. H. Bailey and D. A. Puts. 2017. Gorillas in our midst? Human sexual dimorphism and contest competition in men. In F. J. Ayala (ed.), On human na-ture. 235–249. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hillert, D. 2014. The nature of language: Evolution, paradigms and circuits. New York: Springer.
Jackendoff, R. 1999. Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Science 3. 272–279.
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolu-tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196. 1161–1166.
Kański, Z. 1986. Arbitrary reference and reflexivity: A generative study of the Polish pronoun się and its English equivalents. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.
Kemmer, S. 1994. Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events. In B. Fox and P. J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Ben-jamins, 179–230.
Kitagawa, Y. 1985. Small but clausal. Chicago Linguistic Society 21. 210–220.
Lightfoot, D. 1991. Subjacency and sex. Language & Communication 11. 67–69.
Locke, J. L. 2009. Evolutionary developmental linguistics: Naturalization of the fac-ulty of language. Language Sciences 31. 33–59.
Marantz, A. 1991. Case and licensing. In G. Westphal, B. Ao and H.-R. Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8). 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Marcus, G. 2008. Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Marsh, P. 1978. Aggro: The illusion of violence. London: Dent.
Mihajlović, V. 1992. Ime po zapovesti [Name by Command]. Beograd: Nolit.
Miller, G. A. 2000. The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: William Heinemann.
Müller, F. M. 1861. The theoretical stage, and the origin of language. Lectures on the science of language. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.
Newmeyer, F. J. 1991. Functional explanation in linguistics and the origin of lan-guage. Language and Communication 11. 1–28.
Nichols, J., D. A. Peterson and J. Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 149–211.
Nóbrega, V. and S. Miyagawa. 2015. The precedence of syntax in the rapid emer-gence of human language in evolution as defined by the integration hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00271.
Okanoya, K. 2015. Evolution of song complexity in Bengalese finches could mirror the emergence of human language. Journal of Ornithology 156(1). 65–72.
Patterson, F. and W. Gordon, W. 1993. The case for the personhood of gorillas. In P. Cavalieri and P. Singer (eds.), The great ape project. 58–77. New York, NY: St. Martins Griffin.
Progovac, L. 2009. Sex and syntax: Subjacency revisited. Biolinguistics 3(2–3). 305–336.
Progovac, L. 2013. Nonsentential vs. ellipsis approaches: Review and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 7/11. 597-617.
Progovac, L. 2015. Evolutionary syntax. (Oxford Studies in the Evolution of Lan-guage.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Progovac, L. 2016a. A gradualist scenario for language evolution: Precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and Neandertal) grammars. Frontiers in Psychol-ogy 7.1714. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01714.
Progovac, L. 2016b. Review of Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky’s 2016 book Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Language 92(4). 992–996.
Progovac, L. 2017. Where is continuity likely to be found? Commentary on ‘The so-cial origins of language’ by Robert M. Seyfarth and Dorothy L. Cheney. Edited and introduced by Michael Platt. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 46–61.
Progovac, L. 2019a. A Critical Introduction to Language Evolution: Current Contro-versies and Future Prospects. Springer Expert Briefs in Linguistics. Switzerland: Springer.
Progovac, L. 2019b. Minimalism in the light of biology: What to retain and what to discard? Frontiers in Psychology 10.1303. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01303.
Progovac, L., and A. Benítez-Burraco. 2019. From physical aggression to verbal be-havior: Language evolution and self-domestication feedback loop. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02807.
Progovac, L. and J. L. Locke. 2009. The urge to merge: Ritual insult and the evolu-tion of syntax. Biolinguistics 3(2–3). 337–354.
Progovac, L., N. Rakhlin, W. Angell, R. Liddane, L. Tang and N. Ofen. 2018a. “Diversity of grammars and their diverging evolutionary and processing paths: Evidence from functional MRI study of Serbian. Frontiers in Psychology 9.278. (Special issue: Languages as adaptive systems, edited by E. Aboh and U. Ansaldo.)
Progovac, L., N. Rakhlin, W. Angell, R. Liddane, L. Tang and N. Ofen. 2018b. Neural correlates of syntax and proto-syntax: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Psy-chology 9.2415. 1–16. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02415.
Rivero, M.L. and M. Milojević-Sheppard. 2003. “(Indefinite) reflexive clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 89–155.
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. (Cambridge, MA: Massachu-setts Institute of Technology PhD Dissertation.)
Stanyon, R. and F. Bigoni. 2014. Sexual selection and the evolution of behavior, morphology, neuroanatomy and genes in humans and other primates. Neurosci-ence & Biobehavioral Reviews 46(4). 579–590.
Steels, L. 2011. Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews 8. 339–356.
Stone, L. and P. F. Lurquin. 2007. Genes, culture, and human evolution: A synthesis. Blackwell Publishing.
Stowell, T. 1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2/3. 285–312.
Tallerman, M. 2013. Kin selection, pedagogy, and linguistic complexity: Whence protolanguage? In R. Botha and M. Everaert (eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language. 77–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tchekhoff, C. 1973. Some verbal patterns in Tongan. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 82(3). 281–292.
Toya, G. and T. Hashimoto. 2015. Computational study on evolution and adaptabil-ity of recursive operations. The 20th (AROB) International Symposium on Artifi-cial Life and Robotics. Beppu, Japan. 68–73.
Ullman, M. T. 2006. Is Broca’s area part of a basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit? Cortex 42. 480–485.
Van Leynseele, H. 1975. Restrictions on serial verb constructions in Anyi. Journal of West African Languages X. 189–217.
Weekley, E. 1916. Surnames. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co.
Yip, M., J. Maling and R. Jackendoff. 1987. Case in tiers. Language 63. 217–250.
License
All papers published by the Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting are published in an Open Access model using the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 Creative Commons licence.