Negotiating gender, religious and professional identities. Exploring some of the challenges of non-veiled Muslim women at work

Main Article Content

Farhana Abdul Fatah
Stephanie Schnurr

Abstract

Due to the increasing Islamisation, in contemporary Malaysia, non-veiled Muslim women have become the minority in many domains of public life, including the workplace (Hochel 2013; Izharuddin 2018; Mouser 2007). As the veil is widely regarded as a signifier of a Muslim woman’s identity and her level of piety (Ruby 2006; Stirling & Shaw 2004), a woman’s decision to not wear it can result in discriminatory treatment, such as exclusion from the religious community (Othman 2006).  In this paper we give these often discriminated against women a voice and describe some of the challenges that they experience at work. Our particular focus is how these non-veiling women construct their identities – as religious Muslims, “good” women, and successful professionals – in a socio-cultural context where veiling is the norm (Hochel 2013; Izharuddin 2018; Khalid and O’Connor 2011). Drawing on 20 interviews with such women and using Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005) relationality principle, we demonstrate how through their stories of personal experience these women mobilise and orient to a range of different identities – including gender, religious and professional – which are intertwined  with each other in complex ways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abdul Fatah, F., & Schnurr, S. (2020). Negotiating gender, religious and professional identities. Exploring some of the challenges of non-veiled Muslim women at work. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 6(1), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.2478/yplm-2020-0012
Section
Articles

References

    Abdul Fatah, F. 2019. Discourses of the non-veiled: Exploring discursive identity constructions among Malaysian Muslim women who do not veil. (PhD disserta-tion, University of Warwick.)
    Abdul Hamid, A.F. & M.T. Ismail. 2014. Islamist conservatism and the demise of Islam Hadhari in Malaysia. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 25(2). 159–180.
    Abu-Lughod, L. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist 104(3). 783–790.
    Ahmed, L. 1992. Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    AR, Z. 2014, January 18. To tudung or not to tudung? Malay Mail. Retrieved from .
    Awang Chik, H. 2016. September 18. Drama akhir berhijab, pelakon lama terkejut Uqasha Senrose buka tudung [Last drama veiled, veteran actors surprised Uqa-sha removed her veil]. Projek MM. Retrieved from .
    Azhar, S. & C. Zulkiflee. 2016. June 12. Kelantan’s hauling up of Muslim women raising public worry. The Star. Retrieved from .
    Aziz, A. and A. B. Shamsul. 2004. The religious, the plural, the secular and the modern: A brief critical survey on Islam in Malaysia. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 5(3). 341–356.
    Bakar, H. A., B. Mohamad & C.S. Mustafa. 2007. Superior–subordinate communi-cation dimensions and working relationship: Gender preferences in a Malaysian organization. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36(1). 51–69.
    Barlas, A. 2002. Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Quran. London: Saqi Books.
    Beh, Y. H. 2016. June 11. 31 nabbed in Kelantan Ops Aurat. The Star. Retrieved from .
    Benwell, B. & E. Stokoe. 2006. Theorising discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edin-burgh University Press
    Beta, A.R. 2014. Hijabers: How young urban muslim women redefine themselves in Indonesia. International Communication Gazette 76(4–5). 377–389.
    Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton & A. Radley. 1988. Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. Sage Publica-tions, Inc.
    Boo, S.-L. 2015. May 10. Tudung industry in Malaysia: Cashing in on conservative Islam. Malay Mail. Retrieved from .
    Brubaker, R. & F. Cooper. 2000. Beyond “identity”. Theory and Society 29(1). 1–47.
    Bucholtz, M. & K. Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 585–614.
    Chong, H. 2017. November 13. Hijab ban by hotels discriminatory [Editorial]. News Straits Times. Retrieved from .
    Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black femi-nist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist poli-tics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1). 139–167.
    Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6). 1241–1299.
    Darquennes, J. & W. Vandenbussche. 2011. Language and religion as a sociolinguis-tic field of study: Some introductory notes. Sociolinguistica 25(1). 1–11.
    Department of Statistics Malaysia 2011. Population distribution and basic demo-graphic characteristic report 2010. Retrieved from the Department of Statistics website: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/ctheme&menu_id= L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09
    Droogsma, R.A. 2007. Redefining hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research 35(3). 294–319.
    El Guindi, F. 1999. Veil: Modesty, privacy and resistance. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Eltahawy, M. 2009. Ban the burqa [Editorial]. New York Times. Retrieved from .
    Fadil, N. 2011. Not-/unveiling as an ethical practice. Feminist Review 98(1). 83–109.
    Gee, J.P. 2014. An introduction to discourse analysis : Theory and method. (4th edn.) New York: Routledge.
    Habibu, S. 2016. July 2. Take part in sessions or face charges, those caught under Ops Aurat warned. The Star. Retrieved from .
    Hammami, R. 1990. Women, the hijab and the Intifada. Middle East Report 20(164/165). 24–28.
    Hochel, S. 2013. To veil or not to veil: Voices of Malaysian Muslim women. Inter-cultural Communication Studies 22(2). 40–57.
    Hoffstaedter, G. 2011. Modern Muslim identities: Negotiating religion and ethnicity in Malaysia. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
    Hoodfar, H. 1992. The veil in their minds and on our heads: The persistence of colo-nial images of Muslim women. Resources for Feminist Research 22(3/4). 5–18.
    Husin, W.N.W. 2013. Business dominance among the Malays and Chinese in Ma-laysia from a civilizational perspectives. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 3(4). 360.
    Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and identity – The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Izharuddin, A. 2018. “Free hair”: Narratives of unveiling and the reconstruction of self. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44(1). 155–176.
    Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, pp. 13–31. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Jennings, R. 2018. January 02. Why high-end Malaysian hotels are banning head-scarves. Forbes. Retrieved from .
    Jule, A. 2007. Language and religious identity: women in discourse. In: A. Jule (ed.), Language and religious identity: Women in discourse. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Jule, A. (ed.). 2005. Gender and the language of religion. London: Palgrave MacMil-lan.
    Khalid, R. & M. O’Connor. 2011. The hijab: Representation among the Muslim women in Malaysia. In: The Second Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities, Osaka, Japan: The International Academic Forum (IAFOR). Retrieved from .
    Khalife, L. 2019. January 03. When will people stop comparing hijabis to wrapped candy and sealed letters? [Blog post]. Retrieved from .
    Lee, J.C.H. 2010. Islamization and activism in Malaysia. Singapore: ISEAS Publica-tions.
    Litosseliti, L. & J. Sunderland (eds.). 2002. Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Marshall, G.A. 2005. Ideology, progress, and dialogue: a comparison of feminist and Islamist women’s approaches to the issues of head covering and work in Turkey. Gender & Society 19(1). 104–120.
    Mohamad, Z. 2019. February 06. Emma sah buka tudung. Berita Harian. Retrieved from .
    Mouser, A.E. 2007. Defining “modern” Malay womanhood and the coexistent mes-sages of the veil. Religion 37(2). 164–174.
    Nair, S. 1999. Colonial “others” and national politics in Malaysia. Akademika 54(1). 55–79.
    Noor, N.M. 2009. The future of Malay–Chinese relations in Malaysia. In Peace psychology in Asia, pp. 161–172. New York, NY: Springer.
    Ong, A. 1990. State versus Islam: Malay families, women’s bodies, and the body politic in Malaysia. American Ethnologist 17(2). 258–276.
    Ong, H.S. 2017. June 03. PM: Malaysia widely respected as moderate Islamic na-tion. The Star. Retrieved from .
    Othman, K. 2019. January 28. “I am sorry” – Emma Maembong mengaku buka tudung tapi nafi foto celah kangkang abang Menteri [Emma Maembong admits to removing her veil but denies photo with minister’s brother]. M Star. Retrieved from .
    Othman, N. 2006. Muslim women and the challenge of Islamic fundamental-ism/extremism: An overview of Southeast Asian Muslim women’s struggle for human rights and gender equality. Women’s Studies International Forum 29(4). 339–353.
    Peek, L. 2005. Becoming Muslim: The development of a religious identity. Sociolo-gy of Religion 66(3). 215–242.
    Peletz, M.G. 2013. Malaysia’s syariah judiciary as global assemblage: Islamization, corporatization, and other transformations in context. Comparative Studies in Society and History 55(3). 603–633.
    Rahall, M. 2018. Hijabi Muslim women: Resisting in sexy and fierce formation. INvoke 3(1). 5–19.
    Read, J.G. & J.P. Bartkowski. 2000. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society 14(3). 395–417.
    Saat, N. 2016. Exclusivist attitudes in Malaysian Islam have multifarious roots. Retrieved from the ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute website: .
    Sara. 2013. Candy bars, the hijab, and empowerment [Blog post]. Retrieved from .
    Staunæs, D. 2003. Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist Gender Research 11(2). 101–110.
    Sunderland, J. 2007. Preface. In: A. Jule (ed.), Language and religious identity: women in discourse, pp. xi–xiii. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Sunesti, Y. 2016. Veiling: Between social imaginary and the politic of multicultural-ism in Indonesia and Malaysia. Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 15(2). 145–156.
    Tamale, S. 2015. ‘Keep your eyes off my thighs’: A feminist analysis of Uganda’s ‘Miniskirt Law’. Profile 83–90. Retrieved from .
    Tong, J.K.C. & B.S. Turner. 2008. Women, piety and practice: A study of women and religious practice in Malaysia. Contemporary Islam 2(1). 41–59.
    Toprak, M. & N. Uslu. 2009. The headscarf controversy in Turkey. Journal of Eco-nomic and Social Research 11(1). 43–67.
    Van de Mieroop, D. & S. Schnurr (eds.). 2017. Identity struggles. Evidence from workplaces around the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Compa-ny.
    Vincent, L. 2008. Women’s rights get a dressing down: Mini skirt attacks in South Africa. International Journal of the Humanities 6(6). 11–18.
    Wagner, W., R. Sen, R. Permanadeli & C.S. Howarth. 2012. The veil and Muslim women’s identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture and Psychology 18(4). 521–541.
    Winter, B. 2006. Religion, culture and women’s human rights: Some general political and theoretical considerations. Women’s Studies International Forum 29(4). 381–393.
    Zwick, D. & C. Chelariu. 2006. Mobilizing the hijab: Islamic identity negotiation in the context of a matchmaking website. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(4). 380–395.