TOUCHSTONE, WIREPULLER AND TRANSITION: SINO-KOREAN BOOK-DIPLOMACY AND POLITICAL FIGHTS IN 1597-1599
Embodying an optimistic diplomatic mind in early Joseon Dynasty, haidongzhuguoji written by Shin Suk-ju became a main evidence of Chinese official Ding Yingtai impeaching Joseon in the Jeongyu War occurring in 1597 because of Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s second invasion. Ding Yingtai’s impeachment involved Joseon’s king, Chinese generals in Joseon and officials in Beijing in a political maelstrom, which aroused strong reactions of Joseon king and ministers. In this situation, Joseon’s diplomatic corps were dispatched to Beijing in order to justify and defend. They made preparations and took action zealously, winning the final victory and achieving the goal consequently. However, this book-diplomacy surpassed the problem of justifying a book, thus there were some complicated and subtle meanings in the process. Firstly, This book-diplomacy provided a touchstone of Sino-Korean relationship in Ming Dynasty, explaining the political essence of the relationship. Secondly, This diplomacy resulted from Ming Dynasty’s political fights and calmed down also because of Ming Dynasty’s political fights, intensively showing both Sino-Korean interdependent political fights and each liege fights. Thirdly, The book-diplomacy became an important turning point of the transformation of Joseon’s foreign concept, and Joseon’s “Smaller China” mind began to emphasize excluding barbarians, which made an idealistic preparation for the rising “Smaller China” mind in Qing Dynasty.
An, Jonghwa (安锺和). 1993. 國朝人物志. Seoul; 明文堂.
Heo, Jieun (허지은). 2004. 丁應泰의 朝鮮誣告事件을 통해 본 조·명관계, 史學硏究 (76).
Huang, Ray. 1982. 1587, A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huang, Xiuzhi (黃修志). 2013. “Book-diplomacy”: mingqingshiqi chaoxian de shujibianwu shulun (“書籍外交”:明清時期朝鮮的書籍辨誣述論). 史林 (6).
Im Gi-jung (林基中) ed. 2001. Yanxingluquanji (燕行錄全集). Seoul: 東國大學出版部.
Jeong, Eokgi (정억기). 2007. 이항복의 정치 외교 활동 연구, 홍익대 대학원 박사학위논문.
Joseon Dynasty Sillok (朝鮮王朝實錄), http://sillok.history.go.kr/main/main.do
Ledyard, Gari. 1988-89. “Confucianism and War: The Korean Security Crisis of 1598”, Journal of Korean Studies (6).
Lee, geung ik (李肯翊). 1966. Ranlishi jishu(燃藜室記述). Seoul: 韓 國民族文化促進會.
Lee, Gyehwang (李啓煌). 1995. 慶長の役の最末期における｢丁應泰誣奏事件｣と日・明將らの講和交涉, 日本史硏究 (389).
Li, Guangtao(李光濤). 1982. “Ding Yingtai and Yang Hao: chaoxian renchenwohuo luncong zhiyi”(丁應泰與楊鎬——朝鮮壬辰倭禍論叢之一), 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 (8-10).
Liu, Baoquan (劉寶全). 2011. “Mingwanqi zhongguo he chaoxian de xianghu renshi”(明晚期中國和朝鮮的相互認識), 韓國學論文集 (19). Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.
Martina Deuchler. 1992. The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center for Harvard-Yenching Institute.
Marugame, Kinsaku(丸龜金作). 1939. 朝鮮宣祖朝に於ける明丁応泰の誣奏事件, 歷史學硏究 (8-10).
Ming-Qing Dynasty Shilu (明清王朝實錄), http://sillok.history.go.kr/mc/main.do
Shin, Suk-ju (申叔舟)，Tanaka Takeo trans. 1991. Haidongzhuguoji (海東諸國紀). Tokyo; 岩波書店.
Struve, Lynn A. (ed). 2004. The Qing Formation in World-Historical Time. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
Sun, Weiguo (孫衛國). 2012. “Ding Yingtai tanhe shijian yu mingqing shiji zhi jiangou” (丁應泰彈劾事件與明清史籍之建構), 南開學報 (3).
Suzuki, Kai (鈴木開). 2011. 丁應泰の變と朝鮮-丁酉倭亂期における朝明關係の一局面. 朝鮮學報 (219).
Swope, Kenneth M.. 2007. “Perspectives on the Imjin War”. Journal of Korean Studies (Vol. 12, No. 1).
Tongwenguanzhi(通文館志). Seoul; 首爾大學校奎章閣韓國學研究院. 2006.
Xing Jie (邢玠). 2010. Jinglve yuwo zouyi (經略禦倭奏議). Qingdao: Qingdao Press.
Zhao, Yuan. 1999. Mingqingzhiji shidafu yanjiu (明清之際士大夫研究). Beijing: Beijing University Press.
StatystykiAbstract - 36 PDF - 49
- There are currently no refbacks.