Keywords
Ancient Greek Physics
Presocratics
Chaos
Hesiod
Cosmogony and Cosmology
How to Cite
Abstract
The essay considers synthetically the passages of Hesiod’s Theogony concerning Khaos, Gaia, Uranòs, and Tàrtaros as describing the cosmic structure at its very beginning and at its present state. The final result of the cosmogenetic process consists of three solid parallel disks of equal size separated from one another by the space of Khaos/Aèr. The whole structure is conceived of as an ideal cylinder (ideal because it has no real lateral walls), whose superior base is Uranòs (the Sky), the inferior one is Tàrtaros (the Hell) and the median section is Gaia (the Earth), dividing the whole cylinder into two high semicylinders full of Khaos/Aèr. From this Khaos/Aèr, the primal Four Elements (earth, water, misty air and fire) derive, as plants do from their roots, from which all other substances of the universe originate in turn. Thus, Khaos is arkhè (the ‘beginning’) not only in the chronological-historical sense, but also in the sense of an eternal generative substance of all things. We may conclude that the Hesiodic word khaos is a lexical ancestor of the later physical and philosophical term hyle because it conveys the primeval notion of ‘matter’.
References
Arrighetti, G., 1975, “Cosmologia mitica di Omero e Esiodo”, in: G. Arrighetti (cur.), Esiodo: letture critiche, Milano, pp. 146–213.
Ballabriga, A., 1986, Le Soleil et le Tartare. L’image mythique du monde en Grèce archaíque, Paris 1986.
Burkert, W., 1999, “The Logic of Cosmogony”, in: R. Buxton (ed.), From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, Oxford, pp. 87–106.
Burnet, J., 19203, Early Greek Philosophy, London, pp. 4–6.
Bussanich, J., 1983, “A Theoretical Interpretation of Hesiod’s Chaos”, Classical Philolology 78, pp. 212–219.
Cassanmagnago, C., 2009, Esiodo, Tutte le opere e i frammenti con la prima traduzione degli scolii, Milano.
Cerri, G., 1995, “Cosmologia dell’Ade in Omero, Esiodo e Parmenide”, in: R. Cantilena (cur.), Caronte – Un obolo per l’aldilà. Atti dell’incontro di studi su “La moneta in tomba: un obolo per Caronte?”. Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano 20–22, febbraio 1995, La parola del passato 50, fascicoli 182–185, 1995 (in realtà autunno 1996), pp. 437–467.
Cerri, G., 1998, “L’ideologia dei quattro elementi da Omero ai presocratici”, AION, Sez. filol.-lett., 20 (in realtà novembre 1999), pp. 5–58.
Cerri, G., 19991 (20145), Parmenide di Elea, Poema sulla natura, Introduzione, testo, traduzione e note, Milano.
Cerri, G., 2006, “Empedocle narratore di miti: la vicenda cosmica”, AION (filol.) 28, pp. 49–63 = ‘Livello scientifico e livello mitico nei poemi di Empedocle’, in: G. Casertano (cur.), Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli 2007, pp. 122–142.
Cerri, G., 2013, “L’Oceano più arcaico: al di là del Bosforo e del Canale di Sicilia”, Peitho. Examina antiqua 4, pp. 13–22.
Cornford, F. M., 1950, The Unwritten Philosophy and Other Essays, Cambridge, pp. 95–116.
Cornford, F. M., 1952, Principium Sapientiae, Cambridge 1952.
Gregorio, Di L., 1975, Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Theogoniam, Milano.
Diller, H., 1971, ”Hesiod und die Anfänge der griechischen Philosophie”, Antike und Abendland 2, 1946, pp. 140–151 = Kleine Schriften zur antiken Literatur, München 1971, pp. 19–34.
Fränkel, H., 19511, Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, New York (München 19622; 19693), Kap. III b = Poesia e filosofia della Grecia arcaica, trad. it. Bologna 1997, pp. 158–173.
Gilbert, O., 1907, Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, Leipzig, pp. 17–37.
Hölscher, U., 1953, ”Anaximander und die Anfänge der Philosophie II“, Hermes 81, pp. 385–417, in particolare pp. 391–404 = ”Eredità di concezioni cosmogoniche in Esiodo“, in: G. Arrighetti (cur.), Esiodo: letture critiche, Milano 1975, pp. 127–145 [Corrispondente alle pp. 391–404 dell’ediz. originale].
Jacoby, F., 1930, Hesiodi Carmina, Pars I: Theogonia, Berlin.
Johnson, D. M., 1999, “Hesiod’s Description of Tartarus (Theogony 721–819)”, Phoenix 53, pp. 8–28.
Karl, W., 1967, Chaos und Tartaros in Hesiods Theogonie, Diss. Erlangen.
Kirk, G. S., 1956–1957, “The Interpretation of Hesiod, Theogony 736 ff.”, Proceedings Cambridge Philological Society 184, pp. 10–12.
Kirk, S., Raven, J. E., 19571, The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, Cambridge pp. 24–32; G. S. Kirk, J. E. Raven, M. Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, Cambridge 19832, pp. 34–46 [Edizione in gran parte riscritta e bibliograficamente aggiornata].
Kratzert, T., 1998, Die Entdeckung des Raums: von hesiodischen χάος zur platonischen χώρα, Amsterdam.
Lombardi, M., 2012, “Chaos e Ade in Hes. Th. 720–819”, Hermes 140, pp. 1–17.
Louis, P., 1948, ”Sur le sens du mot ήρ chez Homère’, Revue de philologie 22, pp. 63–72.
Lumpe, A., 1955, ”Der Terminus Prinzip (arché) von den Vorsokratiker bis auf Aristoteles“, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 1, pp. 104–116.
Miller, M. H., 1977, ”La logique implicite de la cosmogonie d’Hésiode: étude des vers 116 à 133 de la Théogonie“, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 4, pp. 433–456.
Mondi, R., 1989, ”ΧΑΟΣ and the Hesiodic Cosmogony”, Harvard Studies Classical Philology 92, pp. 1–39.
Mondolfo, R., 1934, L’infinito nel pensiero dei Greci, Firenze = L’infinito nel pensiero dell’antichità classica, Firenze 1956, Parte quarta, Cap. I (‘L’infinità divina nella teologia presocratica’), pp. 271–294, in particolare pp. 274–283 = Milano 20122, edizione postuma a cura di G. Reale, contenente una ristampa anastatica del testo 1956.
Northrupp, M. D., 1979, “Tartarus Revisited: a Reconsideration of Th. 711–819”, Wiener Studien 92, pp. 22–36.
Paley, F. A., 1883, The Epics of Hesiod. With an English Commentary, London.
Pellikaan-Engel, M. E., 1974, Hesiod and Parmenides. A new view on their cosmologies and on Parmenides’ proem, Amsterdam, pp. 11–50.
Philippson, P., 1936, Genealogie als mythische Form. Studien zur Theogonie des Hesiod, Oslo.
Podbielski, H., 1986, ”Le Chaos et les confins de l’univers dans la Théogonie”, Études classiques 54, pp. 253–263.
Prier, R. A., 1972, ‘On Theogony 118 and 119’, Classical Philology 67, p. 54–55.
Rivaud, A., 1906, Le problème du devenir et la notion de matière dans la philosophie grecque depuis les origines jusqu’à Théophraste, Paris, pp. 1–81, soprattutto 31–34.
Rzach, A., 1902, Hesiodi Carmina, Leipzig [Editio Maior].
Rzach, A., 1902 (1908, 1913), Hesiodi Carmina, Leipzig [Editio minor].
Schwabl, H., 1955, ”Zur Theogonie des Hesiod“, Gymnasium 62, pp. 526–542.
Schwabl, H., 1962, s.v. ”Weltschoepfung“, R.E., Suppl. 9, coll. 1433–1582.
Schwabl, H., 1966, Hesiods Theogonie. Eine unitarische Analyse, Wien.
Solmsen, F., 1950. ”Chaos und Apeiron“, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica, N.S. 24, pp. 235–248 = Kleine Schriften I, Hildesheim 1968, pp. 68–81.
Stokes, M. C., 1962, ”Hesiodic and Milesian Cosmogonies I”, Phronesis 7, pp. 1–37.
Stokes, M. C., 1963, “Hesiodic and Milesian Cosmogonies’ II”, Phronesis 8, pp. 1–34.
Clay, J. S., 2003, Hesiod’s Cosmos, Cambridge.
Lennep, van D. J. (ed.), 1843, Hesiodi Theogonia, Amsterdam.
Wacziarg, A., 2001, “Le Chaos d’Hésiode”, Pallas 57, pp. 131–152.
Wacziarg Engel, A. P., 2014, Hésiode, Théogonie. Un chant du cosmos, Traduit du grec et commenté, Paris, pp. 211–222; 230–241.
Wasser, O., 1899, s.v. “Chaos“, R.E. III 2, col. 2112.
West, M. L., 1966, Hesiod, Theogony, Oxford.
Wisniewski, B., 1963, ‘Sur la signification du ήρ d’Anaximenes’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 35, pp. 112–116.
License
Peitho provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.