Keywords
pragmatic legal linguistics
emergence of meaning in law
language use
ordinary language and law
legal discourse
How to Cite
Abstract
In this review essay, I describe some basic problems in the research into the legal language that are methodologically connected to linguistic and philosophical pragmatics. I call this area of knowledge pragmatic legal linguistics. Pragmatic legal linguistics deals with the processes that are constitutive of the emergence of meaning in law. Its basic concepts are coined in the course of developments in linguistic and philosophical pragmatics. It applies pragmatic theoretical approaches to clarify the functioning of the legal language and discovers new areas of pragmatic relevance in the research into the legal language. The final goal of pragmatic legal linguistics is to re-formulate our laws in accordance with linguistic findings about the use of language.
References
Aarnio, Aulis. 1987. The Rational as Reasonable: A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Aarnio, Aulis. 1989. Laintulkinnan teoria. Porvoo/Helsinki/Juva: W. Söderström.
Adeodato, João Maurício. 1999. The Rhetorical Syllogism (Enthymeme) in Judicial Argumentation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol. 12: 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008998121097
Aher, Martin. 2013. Modals in Legal Language. Osnabrück: Osnabrück University. PhD Thesis.
Arntz, Reiner. 2002. The Roman Heritage in German Legal Language. In: The Development of Legal Language, ed. Heikki E. S. Mattila, 33 - 54. Helsinki: Kauppakaari.
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.
Beever, Jonathan, McDaniel, Rudy, Stanlick, Nancy A. 2020. Understanding Digital Ethics: Cases and Contexts. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315282138
Capone, Alessandro, Poggi, Francesca (eds.) .2016. Pragmatics and Law: Philosophical Perspectives. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30385-7
Capone, Alessandro, Poggi, Francesca (eds.) 2017. Pragmatics and Law: Practical and Theoretical Perspectives. Cham: Springer.
Chagas Oliveira, Eduardo 2012. Persuasão: o componente pragmático de argumentaçao. Caderno CRH, vol. 25: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792012000500007
Dubrovskaya, Tatiana. 2008. Applying Metaphor in the English Legal Discourse. In: Language, Thought and Education, vol. 1. Kuczyński, M., Zawodniak, J. (eds.), 29-41. Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1991. Law's Empire. London: Fontana Press.
Dworkin, Ronald, 2005. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
Ervo, Laura. 2016. The Hidden Meanings in the Case Law of the European Court for Human Rights. Semiotica, vol. 209: 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0009
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel. 1969. L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Galdia, Marcus. 2014. Legal Discourses. Frankfurt a.M.: P. Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04812-4
Galdia, Marcus. 2017. Lectures on Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt a.M.: P. Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b11443
Galdia, Marcus. 2020. The Comparative Element in Comparative Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics, vol. 43: 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2020-0008
Galdia, Marcus. 2021a. Legal Constructs. Reflections on Legal-Linguistic Methodology. Poznań: Rys.
Galdia, Marcus. 2021b. Conceptual Origins of Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics, vol. 47: 17-56. https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0011
Giltrow, Janet, Stein, Dieter (eds.) 2017. The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2017. Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus-Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland's Constitutional Tribunal Judgments. Comparative Legilinguistics, vol. 32: 91-115. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2017.32.4
Grech, Michał. 2021. Prawo, język i komunikacja - stan i perspektywy badań nad zniesławieniem i mową nienawiści. Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne, vol. 38: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.19195/1733-5779.38.3
Hagège, Claude. 1987. Le français et les siècles. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is hereby performed. Explorations in Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.6
Kurzon, Dennis. 1998. Discourse of Silence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.49
Kurzon, Dennis, Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. (eds.) 2018. Legal Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.288
Larrazabal, Jesus M., Korta, Kepa. 2002. Pragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some Conceptual Remarks. Manuscrito, vol. 25/2: 233-248.
Liao, Meizhen. 2012. Courtroom Discourse in China. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Tiersma, Peter M., Solan, Lawrence M. (eds.), 395-420. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lizisowa, Maria Teresa. 2016. Komunikacyjna teoria języka prawnego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Contact.
Luzzati, Claudio. 2018. Gli alti e bassi della pragmatica giuridica. Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche, vol. 17: 325-339.
Marmor, Andrei. 2014. The Language of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2012. Oikeustiede. In: Genreanalyysi - tekstilajitutkimuksen käsikirja, Vesa Heikkinen, Eero Voutilainen, Petri Lauerma, Ulla Tiililä and Mikko Luonela (eds.), 618-623. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2013. Comparative Legal Linguistics. Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas, 2nd ed. Aldershot: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.5235/2049677X.2.1.143
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2018a. Legal Language. In: Languages for Special Purposes, Humbley, J., Budin, G., Laurén, C. (eds.), 113-150. Berlin/Boston: W. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110228014-006
Mattila, Heikki. E.S. 2018b. Oikeuskielistä teorialähtöisesti. Lakimies, vol. 6: 807-809.
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2020. El latín jurídico. Historia, uso internacional, problemas de comunicación. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Olejnik.
Mattila, Heikki E.S. 2021. Jurilinguistique compareé. Essai de charactérisation d'une discipline multidimensionnelle. International Journal of the Semiotics of Law, vol. 34: 1141-1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09825-x
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna, Karma, Helena (eds.) 2006. Oikeuden tekstit diskursseina. Helsinki: Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys.
Recanati, François. 2008. Philosophie du langage (et de l'esprit). Paris: Gallimard.
Refors Legge, Maria. 2021. Skolans skyldighet att förhindra kränkande behandling av elever. En rättsvetenskaplig studie. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
Ross, Alf. 1957. Tû Tû. Harvard Law Review, vol. 70/5: 812-825. https://doi.org/10.2307/1337744
Searle, John. 2011. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
Schane, Sanford. 2012. Contract Formation as a Speech Act. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Tiersma, Peter M., Solan, Lawrence M. (eds.), 100-113. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0008
Simonnæs, Ingrid. 2012. Rechtskommunikation national und international im Spannungsfeld von Hermeneutik, Kognition und Pragmatik. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Sperber, Dan, Mercier, Hugo. 2017. The Enigma of Reason. A New Theory of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674977860
Stein, Stephan. 1995. Formelhafte Sprache. Untersuchungen zu ihren pragmatischen und kognitiven Funktionen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt a.M.: P. Lang.
Sutela, Mika, Lindroos, Emilia. 2021. Kysymys rangaistuksen mittaamisesta - Empiirinen analyysi korkeimman oikeuden rangaistuksen määräämiseen liittyvien ennakkopäätösten otsikoista. Edilex, vol. 12: 1-44.
Williams, Christopher, Tessuto, Girolamo (eds.). 2016. Language in the Negotiation of Justice. Contexts, Issues and Applications. London/New York: Routledge.
Zhang, Naigen. 2002. Guoji fa yuanli. The Theory of International Law. Beijing: Zhongguo Zheng Fa Daxue.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marcus Galdia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher