Abstract
The increasing encounters of clinical science and the rule of law in and outside the courtrooms is one distinctive characteristic of our modern era. At first glance, legal analysis and clinical reasoning could be either completely different or substantially similar. Should we consider the issue through the lens of our scientific revolution legacy, a common rational framework would be a defining converging point drawing together a step-by-step analysis from proven or known facts to the applicable standards, whether it be of law or medicine. However, key differences cannot be overlooked between two disciplines which purport to answer different sets of “what is” vs “should be” questions. This text provides an in-depth comparative analysis of the premises and processes underlying both the legal and clinical reasonings. It highlights cultural differences between the two disciplines which extend beyond the need to translate between two distinct languages, that of law and of medicine. Rather, it can be fairly stated that a court trial involving medical expertise should be ordering a fair and structured translating process between legal and medical cultures.
References
Andreoletti, M., Berchialla, P., Boniolo, G., & Chiffi, D. (2019). Introduction: Foundations of clinical reasoning – An epistemological stance. Topoi, 38, 389–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9619-4
Banks, C. P. (1999). Reversals of precedent and judicial policy-making: How judicial conceptions of stare decisis in the U.S. Supreme Court influence social change. Akron Law Review, 32(2), Article 1.
Beaulac, S., & Côté, P.-A. (2006). Driedger’s “Modern Principle” at the Supreme Court of Canada: Interpretation, justification, legitimization. Revue juridique Thémis, 40, 131–172.
Brignardello-Petersen, R., Carrasco-Labra, A., & Guyatt, G.H. (2021). How to interpret and use a clinical practice guideline or recommendation. Users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA, 326(15), 1516–1523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.15319
Canela, C., Buadze, A., Dube, A., Jackowski, C., Pude, I., Nellen, R., Signorini, P., & Liebrenz, M. (2019). How do legal experts cope with medical reports and forensic evidence? The experiences, perceptions, and narratives of Swiss judges and other legal experts. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00018
Chakraborty, S., Brijnath, B., Dermentzis, J., & Mazza, D. (2020). Defining key questions for clinical practice guidelines: A novel approach for developing clinically relevant questions. Health Research Policy & Systems, 18(1), Article 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00628-3
Custers, E. J. F. M. (2018). Training clinical reasoning: Historical and theoretical background. In O. T. Cate, E. J. F. M. Custers, & S. J. Durning (Eds.), Principles and practice of case-based clinical reasoning education: A method for preclinical students (pp. 21–33). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64828-6_2
Faigman, D. L. (1999). Legal alchemy: The use and misuse of science in the law. Times Books.
Freckelton, I., & Mendelson, D. (2017). Causation in law and medicine. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315260761
Gerdy K. B. (2013). The heart of lawyering: Clients, empathy and compassion. In J. H. Wise, S. W. Cameron, & G. L. Fletcher (Eds.), Life in the Law (Vol. 3: Religious conviction, pp. 189–202). Brigham Young University Press, J. Reuben Clark Law Society at Brigham Young University.
Higgs J., Burn, A., & Jones, M. (2001). Integrating clinical reasoning and evidence-based practice. AACN Clin Issues, 12(4), 482–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200111000-00005
Iacobucci, F., & Hamilton, G. (2010). The Goudge inquiry and the role of medical expert witnesses. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(1), 53–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090833
Katan, D. (2020). Cultural approaches to translation. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0293.pub2
Kleisiaris, C. F., Sfakianakis, C., & Papathanasiou, I. V. (2014). Health care practices in ancient Greece: The Hippocratic ideal. J. Med Ethics Hist Med, 7(6).
Lodge, G. C. (1974). Decision making and problem solving. Business and the changing society. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1974/03/business-and-the-changing-society
Masic, I., Miokovic, M., & Muhamedagic, B. (2008). Evidence based medicine - New approaches and challenges. Acta Inform Med, 16(4), 219–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2008.16.219-225
Panda S.C. (2006). Medicine: Science or art? Mens Sana Monogr, 4(1), 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.27610
Popper, K. (1935). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.
Risager, K. (2012). Culture and context: Overview. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1346
Rosoff, A. J. (2001). Evidence-based medicine and the law: The courts confront clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 26(2), 327–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-26-2-327
Sallam, H.N. (2010). Aristotle, godfather of evidence-based medicine. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2(1), 11–19.
Skolnik, T. (2019). Causation, fault, and fairness in the criminal law. McGill LJ, 65(1), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1074416ar
Sniderman, A. D., LaChapelle, K. J., Rachon, N. A., & Furberg, C. D. (2013). The necessity for clinical reasoning in the era of evidence-based medicine. Mayo Clin Proc, 88(10), 1108–1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.012
Sullivan, R. (2003). Statutory interpretation in a new nutshell. Canadian Bar Review, 82(1), 51–82.
Valderas, J. M., Starfield, B., Sibbald, B., Salisbury, C., & Roland, M. (2009). Defining comorbidity: Implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med, 7(4), 357–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.983
Woolley, S. R. (2016). Neutrality of therapist in couple and family therapy. In J. Lebow, A. Chambers, & D. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp. 1-3). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_541-1
Yan, C., & Huang, J. (2014). The culture turn in translation studies. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 487–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.44041
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CAROLE SENECHAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher