Keywords
international migrants in Australia
access
questions and answers
How to Cite
Abstract
With nearly half of its population born overseas, Australia is one of the most prominent societies built and shaped by migrants worldwide. In Australian courts, access to court interpreting is crucial for social inclusion. However, translating the language of law in court is never an easy job. Therefore, court interpreters serve as indispensable gatekeepers for procedural justice and linguistic equity. But how accurately did court interpreters reproduce lawyer questioning and defendant testimony in court? Drawing on triangulated survey and interpreting performance data, our initial findings suggest a mismatch between what the interpreters said they would do and what the interpreters actually did when translating the manner in which lawyers crafted their questions and defendant responded to their questions in court. Our contributions are three-fold: (1) increasing the linguistic ‘manner awareness’, (2) promoting interprofessional understanding, and (3) compassing future pedagogies in court interpreter education.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2023. 2021 Census of Population. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release (accessed April 30, 2023).
Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators. 2012. AUSIT Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from https://ausit.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Code_Of_Ethics_Full.pdf (accessed January 19, 2023).
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2002. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226923277.001.0001
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Dayter, Daria. 2021. "Variation in Non-Fluencies in a Corpus of Simultaneous Interpreting vs. Non-Interpreted English." Perspectives, 29(4): 489-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1718170
Evidence Act NSW. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1995-025 (accessed October 24, 2023).
Gibbons, Alison, and Sara Whiteley. 2018. Contemporary Stylistics: Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1tqx9wz. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748682782
Harris, Sandra. 1984. "The Form and Function of Threats in Court." Language & Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(84)90010-7
Hosman, Lawrence A., and Susan A. Siltanen. 2011. "Hedges, Tag Questions, Message Processing, and Persuasion." Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(3): 341-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11407169
Hu, Jiale. 2022. Hedges in Chinese-English Conference Interpreting. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1442-3
Judicial Council on Diversity and Inclusion. 2022. Recommended National Standards for Working with Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals - Second Edition. Retrieved from https://jcdi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/JCDD-Recommended-National-Standards-for-Working-with-Interpreters-in-Courts-and-Tribunals-second-edition.pdf (accessed January 19, 2023).
Lee, Jieun. 2011. "Translatability of Speech Style in Court Interpreting." International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 18(1): 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.1
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. "Monitoring and Self-Repair in Speech." Cognition, 14(1): 41-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
Levis, John M. 2012. "Supreasegmentals: Intonation." The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1124 (accessed January 16, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1124
Liu, Binghan, and Eileen Xiao. 2009. "Chinese Discourse Markers in Oral Speech of Mainland Mandarin Speakers." In Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-21) (Vol. 2, pp. 358-374). Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island.
Magnifico, Chiara, and Bart Defrancq. 2017. "Hedges in Conference Interpreting: The Role of Gender." Interpreting, 19: 21-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.1.02mag
Miracle, W. Charles. 1991. Discourse Markers in Mandarin Chinese. The Ohio State University: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/f19f718bebf158e5d506a3e5446f6977/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (accessed January 13, 2023).
O'Barr, William M. 2014. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom. Elsevier.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841
United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Retrieved from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/our-human-rights-work/monitoring-and-promoting-un-treaties/international-covenant-civiland#:~:text=ICCPR%20is%20an%20international%20human,or%20degrading%20treatment%20or%20punishment (accessed October 6, 2023).
Wadensjo, Cecilia. 2001. "Approaching Interpreting through Discourse Analysis." Benjamins Translation Library, 33: 185-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.33.12wad
Wang, Yibin. 2021. "A Study on the Use of Hesitation Markers in Varied-Level EFL Learners’ L2 Speaking Process." Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11: 823-840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.115063
Yi, Ran. 2023a. "Interpreting the Manner of Speech in Courts: An Overlooked Aspect." Frontiers in Psychology, 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1209908
Yi, Ran. 2023b. "Justice Under Microscope: Analyzing Mandarin Chinese Markers in Virtual Courtroom Discourse." Discourse Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231197045
Yi, Ran. 2024a. "Manner Matters: Linguistic Equity through a Court Interpreter in Australia." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10090-3
Yi, Ran. 2024b. "Doing Justice to the Manner: Interpreting Lawyer Questioning for Multilingual Migrants in Australian Virtual Court Proceedings." Monti, 16: 415-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2024.16.13
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ran Yi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher