Insults and death threats against Nadiya Lazzouni from a forensic linguistics perspectives
Journal cover Comparative Legilinguistics, volume 63, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

forensic linguistic
Comparative legilinguistics
multilingual legal contexts
standardized terminology
sociolinguistics

How to Cite

Zahra, F. N., Santoso, W. J., & Wijaya, A. R. (2025). Insults and death threats against Nadiya Lazzouni from a forensic linguistics perspectives . Comparative Legilinguistics, 63, 267–295. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2025.63.3

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive forensic linguistic analysis of insults and death threats directed at Nadiya Lazzouni, emphasizing the roles of semantics, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics within legal contexts. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines qualitative and quantitative analyses to examine linguistic elements within legal frameworks, drawing on data from Lazzouni’s personal social media account, where she disclosed the threatening letter. Through a comparative legilinguistics perspective, the research elucidates how various legal systems interpret and enforce laws related to hate speech and threats. The findings reveal that the letter contains severe insults and death threats rooted in religious and racial identity, underscoring the legal challenges posed by multilingual and sociocultural variations in legal interpretation. This study highlights the necessity for standardized legal terminology and the development of forensic linguistic tools to enhance clarity and fairness in legal proceedings involving speech-related offenses. By integrating linguistic analysis with forensic and comparative legal methodologies, this research contributes to the broader discourse on multilingualism in legal practice and the effectiveness of legal communication in addressing hate speech and threats.

https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2025.63.3
PDF

References

Adilmuratova, R., Alembayev, K., Kozhuganova, D., Gavrilova, Y., & Menzyuk, G. (2024). Court interpreters’ role in upholding the principle of language in legal proceedings: Kazakhstan case. Comparative Legilinguistics 59: 188-212 (September 30).

Asfar, N. A. (2022). A Literature Review of Hate Speech: Forensic Linguistics Study. IJFL: International Journal of Forensic Linguistics 3, no 2: 109-114 (December 2).

Auliyak, M. A., & Santoso, W. J. (2019). Studi Kasus Linguistik Forensik: Analisis Profiling Catatan Bunuh Diri Marjorie Raymond. Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya. Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 17.

Bell, A., Sharma, D., & Britain, D. (2016). Labov in Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20, no 4: 1-9 (September 1),

Dariyo, A. (2013). Mengapa Seseorang Mau Menjadi Pembunuh. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi 4, no 1: 10-20. http://www.e-jurnal.com/2014/12/mengapa-seseorang-mau-menjadi-pembunuh.html

Darnell, R. (2019). Reviewed Work(s): Sociolinguistics Patterns by William Labov. Language, Linguistic Society of America 51, no 4: 1008-1016 (Mei 3),

Edwards, J. (2023). Multilingualism Understanding linguistics diversity (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. ISBN ePDF: 978-1-3501-9543-1.

Fiantika, F. R., Wasil, M., Jumiyanti, S., Honesti,L., Wahyuni, S., Mouw, E., Jonata. Mashudi, I., Hasanah,N., Maharani, A., Ambarwati, K., Noflidaputri, R., Nuryami, & Waris,L. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (1st ed.). Global Eksekutif Teknologi. ISBN: 978-623-99749-1-6.

Fikiyah, R. A., & Santoso, W. J. (2024). Kajian Komparatif Onomatope dalam Webtoon Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Prancis. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa. 13(2). 457-471.

Galdia, M. (2022). Foundations of Pragmatic Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics 52: 241-278.

Johnson, F. X., Canales, N., Fielding, M., Gladkykh, G., Aung, M. T., Bailis, R., Ogeya, M, & Olsson, O. (2022). A comparative analysis of bioeconomy vision and pathways based on stakeholder dialogues in Colombia, Rwada, Sweden, and Thailand. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 24(6): 680-700.

Kurniawati, W., Ekoyanantiashih, R., Yulianti, S., Hardaniawati, M., Sasangka, W., & Firdaus, W. (2022). Kekuasaan Semantik dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis Debat Capres-Cawapres. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa 11, no 1: 165-179 (Juni 18),

Kusno, A., Arifin, M. B., & Mulawarman, W. G. (2022). Pengungkapan Pemereasan dan Pengancaman pada Alat Bukti Kasus Pinjaman Online (Kajian Linguistik Forensik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya 5, no 3: 555-570 (August 1),

Kusumawardhani, P. (2024). Language and Forensic Linguistics. IJEAL: International Journal English and Applied Linguistics 4, no 1: 48-53 (April 1),

Mahsun. (2018). Linguistik Forensik: Memahami Forensik Berbasis Teks dalam Analogi DNA (1st ed.). Rajagrafindo Persada. ISBN: 978-602-425.

Maruti, E. S., Cahyono, B. E. H., and Yuhanna, W. L. (2021). Sistem Hipoimi dalam Bahasa Jawa: Kajian Semantik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa 10, no 2: 229-239.

McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann-Whitney U test. In The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th ed.). Wiley.

McMenamin, G. R. (2002). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. CRC Press.

Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13–20.

Nafinuddin, S. (2020). Pengantar Semantik (Pengertian, Hakikat, Jenis). (accessed Mei 26, 2024)

Nasarudin, Fathonah, S., Fadililah, A., Afriana, Izomi, M. S., Ayu, F., Ambalegin, Ratnasari, R., Rosmita, E., Hasaniyah, N., Resiana, A., & Hentihu, I. F. (2024). Pengantar Sosiolinguistik: Variasi Bahasa dalam Konteks Sosiolinguistik (1st ed.). C. Wardoyo (Ed.). Gita Lentera. ISBN: 978-623-8548-60-6

Rahmat, W. (2017). Linguistik Forensik, Alat Analisis Kejahatan Berbahasa. STKIP PGRI Sumatra Barat.

Ryancudu, R., Ekatjahjana, W., & Purwalaksana, I. B. (2016). Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Pertahanan Negara Tahun 2015-2016, no 41. Kementrian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.

République Française. (2024). Code Pénal (2024-07-27). droit.org Institut Français d’Information Juridique. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/

Satria, R. (2016). Analisis Kasus Pembunuhan dan Pemerasan Menggunakan Teori Linguistik Non-Kepengarangan: Sebuah Kajian Linguisti. k Forensik. Prosiding 1th Celcitech-UMRI 1, no 20: 19-24. ISSN: 2541-3023.

Serio, M., Potenzano, R., Geraci, G., Petruso, R, & Patti, N. (2023). Ethics in Legal Research. UNIPA Springer Series. 11-34.

Smith, G. (2020). Data mining fool’s gold. Journal of Information Technology JIT 35(3): 182-194).

Smith, J. (2020). Bias in linguistic data analysis: Avoiding misinterpretations in forensic linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Subyantoro. (2019). Linguistik Forensik: Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan Hukum. ADIL Indonesia Jurnal 1, no 1: 36-50. https://lib.unnes.ac.id/53268/

Subyantoro. (2022). Linguistik Forensik: Sebuah Pengantar (1st ed.). Farishma Indonesia. ISBN 978-602-5807-00-8

Sunarso. (1997). Variabel Kelas Sosial, Umur, dan Jenis Kelamin Penutur dalam Penelitian Sosiolinguistik. Humaniora, 4: 82-86.

Santoso, W. J., & Auliyak, M. A. (2019). Kajian UU MD3 Revisi 2018 dalam Perspektif Linguistik Forensik. Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya. 17

Susanto, G. (2022). Proses Morfologis dan Makna Semantik Kosakata Pembelajar, Pebelajar, dan Pemelajar. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa 11, no 1: 35-48 (Juni 4).

Wahyudi, A. (2018). Ketika Membunuh Menjadi Sebuah Penyelesaian, Sebuah Tinjauan Fenomenologis Mengenai Tindakan Seseorang Melakukan Pembunuhan. The Journal of Society & Media 2, no 1: 13-30.

Warami, H. (2022). Kejahatan Bahasa di Wilayah Hukum Papua Barat: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa 11, no 1: 76-93 (Juni 9).

Wijana, D. P., and Rohmadi, M. (2022). Sosiolinguistik Kajian Teori dan Analisis (7th prnt). Pustaka Pelajar. ISBN: 979-2458-78-6.