References
Boginskaya, Olga. 2022. Dissenting with conviction: boosting in challenging the majority opinion. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7, no. 2. 257–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2073
Borja Albi, Anabel. 2013. A genre analysis approach to the study of the translation of court documents. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series 12, 33–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v0i12.235
Breeze, Ruth. 2016. Balancing neutrality and partiality in arbitration: discursive tensions in separate opinions. Text&Talk 36, no. 4, 363–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0017
Bruinsma, Fred J. 2006. Les Opinions Séparées Des Juges à La Cour Européenne Des Droits de l’Homme. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 24, no. 2, 358–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410602400211
Bruinsma, Fred J. 2008. The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006). Ancilla Iuris 32, 32–43.
Etxabe, Julen. 2022. The dialogical language of law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 59, no. 2. 429–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3783
Etxabe, Julen. 2024. Pluralising judicial authority: The double-voiced opinion. In The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Legal Studies, eds. Karen Crawley, Thomas Giddens and Timothy D. Peters, 285–299. London/New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003467762-22
Galdia, Marcus. 2022. Foundations of pragmatic Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics 51, 241-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.51.2022.11
Garzone, Giuliana. 2016. Polyphony and dialogism in legal discourse: Focus on syntactic negation. In Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives, eds. Girolamo Tessuto Vijay K. Bhatia, Giuliana Garzone, Rita Salvi and Christopher Williams, 2–27. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2020. Communicating dissent in judicial opinions: A comparative, genre-based analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33, no. 2, 381–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09711-y
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2024a. Evaluative language in Judicial Argumentation. Sources of Language and Law (SOULL) 1. https://legal-linguistics.net/dossiers/evaluative-language-in-judicial-argumentation/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003333302-9
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław. 2024b. Language and Legal Judgments. Evaluation and Argument in Judicial Discourse. London-New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003333302
Kurzon, Dennis. 2001. The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics 33, no. 1, 61–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00123-X
Lavissière, Mary C. and Warren Bonnard. 2024. Who’s really got the right moves? Analyzing recommendations for writing American judicial opinions. Languages 9, no. 4, 119–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9040119
McKeown, Jamie. 2021. A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Pragmatics 186, 224–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.019
McKeown, Jamie. 2022a. A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court. Discourse & Communication 16, no. 6, 652–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221108827
McKeown, Jamie. 2022b. Stancetaking in the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence (1973-present): epistemic (im)probability and evidential (dis)belief. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7, no. 2, 323–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2075
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, no. 2, 151–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2017. Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. London: Routledge.
Nikitina, Jekaterina. 2025a. Human Rights Discourse: Linguistics, Translation and Genre at the European Court of Human Rights. London-New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003434788
Nikitina, Jekaterina. 2025b. Dialogical reasoning in separate judicial opinions: the path of negation. In In the Minds of Judges. Argumentative Discourse at the Intersection of Law and Language, eds. Gianluca Pontrandolfo and Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, 201–224. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111569628-009
Nikitina, Jekaterina. 2026, forthcoming. “This is not only wrong, but”: on re-emerging identities in supranational judicial prose”. In Perspectives on Diversity and Identity in Changing Times, eds. Paola Catenaccio, Giorgia Riboni, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Peruzzo, Katia. 2019. National law in supranational case-law: A linguistic analysis of European Court of Human Rights judgments in English. Trieste: EUT Edizioni.
Peruzzo, Katia. 2024. Trans, transgender, and transsexual in case law: A corpus-assisted analysis of ECtHR judgments. In Where Gender and Corpora Meet. New Insights into Discourse Analysis, eds. Eva Lucía Jiménez-Navarro and Leonor Martínez Serrano, 157–180. Bern: Peter Lang.
Peruzzo, Katia. 2025. International judicial discourse and non-derogatory language use: A case study on ECtHR judgments. In In the Minds of Judges. Argumentative Discourse at the Intersection of Law and Language, eds. Gianluca Pontrandolfo and Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, 227–256. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111569628-010
Rzucidło, Iwona. 2020. Uzasadnienie orzeczenia sądowego: Ujęcie teoretyczne a poglądy orzecznictwa. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2014. Stancetaking strategies in judicial discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court opinions. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 1, 91–120.
Vass, Holly. 2017. Lexical verb hedging in legal discourse: The case of law journal articles and Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions. English for Specific Purposes 48, 17–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.07.001
White, Robin and Iris Boussiakou. 2009. Separate opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 9, no. 1. 37–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn033
Wigard, Kyra. 2023. Matter of Opinion: Assessing the Role of Individual Judicial Opinions at the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Law Review 23, no. 3, 387–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10144
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jekaterina Nikitina, Katia Peruzzo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher