DISAPPEARANCE OF WITNESSES’ OWN WORDS

Main Article Content

Mami Hirake OKAWARA

Abstract

This paper discusses the characteristics of prosecutor’s language that would appear in the prosecution witness’s answers during direct examination. I performed a linguistic comparison of the language that is used in a witness’s answers against that of five relevant documents, which include a prosecutor’s opening statement, a prosecutor’s final statement, 11 samples of suspect’s statements from the handbook for investigating officers and one from witness’s personal letters. I would like to argue that as the witness’s answer had the features of a prosecutor’s language as well as written language, the prosecutor’s ten meetings with the witness immediately before the trial may have possibly influenced not only the witness’s language but also the content of the testimony itself. The analysis of this paper is based upon my expert witness opinion that was submitted to the Tokyo High Court and Japanese Supreme Court for the case in question.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
OKAWARA, M. H. (2012). DISAPPEARANCE OF WITNESSES’ OWN WORDS. Comparative Legilinguistics, 10, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2012.10.02
Section
Articles

References

  1. Blackwell, S., 2009. Why Forensic Linguistics Needs Corpus Linguistics in Comparative Linguistics: International Journal for Legal Communication, vol (1), p. 5-19.
  2. Coulthard, M., 1994. Corpora in the Analysis of Forensic Linguistics in Forensic Linguistics vol. 1(1), p.27-43.
  3. Coulthard, M., 1994. Powerful Evidence for the Defence: an Exercise in Forensic Discourse Analysis, in ed. By John Gibbons, Language and the Law, London and New York: Longman, p. 424-27.
  4. Fox, G., 1993. A Comparison of ‘Policespeak’ and ‘Normalspeak’: A Preliminary Study, in Sinclair J.M, Hoey M., and G Fx 8eds), Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, A Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard, London: Routledge,p. 183-195.
  5. Gillett, A., A. Hammond and M. Martala-Lockett, 2009. Inside Track to Academic Writing, Longman.
  6. Halliday, M. A. K. 1989. Spoken and Written Language, Oxford University Press.
  7. Kajiki, H., K Terawaki & R Inagawa. 2006. Shin Sousa Shorui Zenshuu:Torishirabe (A New Complete Work of Investigating Documents: Interrogation), Tachibana Shobo.
  8. Svartvik, J. 1968. The Evans Statement: A Case for Forensic Linguistics, Goteborg: University of Gothenburg Press.