STORY-TELLING IN JUDICIAL DISCOURSE

Main Article Content

Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ

Abstract

Judicial discourse and the style of written judicial decisions has been subject of numerous analyses. Judicial discourse comprises different elements from formal and structural ones to various modes of argumentation used. Narrative – when approached as a form or a structure – may be helpful in thorough analyses of judicial discourse, in particular the texts of judgements. This paper analyzes one judgement of a Czech court by means of narrative analysis and tackles the issues of narrative differentiation, narrative structure and narrative coherence in relation to judicial decision-making. Furthermore, it addresses the issue of story-telling and its importance within judicial discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
SMEJKALOVÁ, T. (2017). STORY-TELLING IN JUDICIAL DISCOURSE. Comparative Legilinguistics, 5, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2011.5.07
Section
Articles

References

  1. Almog, Shulamit. 2001. As I read, I weep – In Praise of Judicial Narrative. Oklahoma City University Law Review Vol. 26, No. 2, 471-501.
  2. Burke, Kenneth. 1945. A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  3. Berger, Linda L. 2009. How Embedded Knowledge Structures Affect Judicial Decision Making: A Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Narrative, and Imagination in Child Custody disputes. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18: 259- 308. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1231584.
  4. Brooks, Peter. 2002. Narrativity of the Law. Law and Literature 14: 1-10.
  5. Delgado, Richard. 1988-1989. Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative. Mich. L. Rev. 87: 2411-2441.
  6. Edwards, Linda H. 2010. Once Upon a Time in Law: Myth, Metaphor, and Authority. UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1462570.
  7. Kühn, Zdeněk. Srovnani stylu soudniho rozhodnuti v České republice, zapadni Evropě a USA, Soudce 1/2001, 8.
  8. Lee-Goldman, Russel. 2005. Aspects of Legal Narrative.
  9. www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~rleegold/ling/narrativeinbriefs.pdf.
  10. Luyster, Deborah B. 2002. English Law Courts and the Novel. Law and Literature 14:595-605.
  11. Lasser, Mitchel de S. O.-l’E. 2003. Anticipating Three Models of Judicial Control, Debate and Legitimacy: The European Court of Justice, the Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court. Jean Monnet Working Paper 1/03. New York: New York University School of Law.
  12. Lasser, Mitchel de S. O.-l’E. 1997-1998. Lit. Theory put to the Test: A Comparative Literary Analysis of American Judicial Tests and French Judicial Discourse. Harv. L. Rev. 111: 689- 770.
  13. MacComick, Neil. 2009. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Šejvl, Michal. 2003. Jak udělat spravedlnost slovy. In Problémy interpretace a argumentace v soudobé právní teorii a právní praxi, 183-194. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.
  15. Turner, Mark. 2005. Literární mysl: o původu myšlení a jazyka [transl.: Olga Trávníčková]. Brno: Host.
  16. White, James Boyd. 1996. Imagining the Law. In The Rhetoric of Law. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.