DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ESSENCE OF LAW IN THE DISCOURSE ON LAW AND ORDER

Main Article Content

Vasily TOKARYEV

Abstract

The article is devoted to the ontological structure of law. The contradictions between its various interpretations are eliminated in the law and order discourse. He allows to reveal the social bases of law – the legal situations resolved by the legitimate instance. The law and order discourse is formed in a context of political and legal doctrines of the epoch of the Enlightenment. They raised a question about the universal character of legal structure and offered a new methodology of its comprehension. Subsequently V.S. Nersesyanc interpreted this discourse in an original way. However in the beginning of the XX-th century the weaknesses of the discourse of law and order became the reason of crisis of sense of justice. The conception of ―political theology‖ by C. Schmitt who criticized the liberal jurisprudence was the answer to it. At the same time a rivalry between points of view within the limits of a uniform scientific discourse brings to light its such essential component as a free discussion. Nevertheless, the discussion about essence of law is artificial narrowed by the considerable influence of the political sphere on the legal sphere.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
TOKARYEV, V. (2010). DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ESSENCE OF LAW IN THE DISCOURSE ON LAW AND ORDER. Comparative Legilinguistics, 4, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2010.4.9
Section
Articles

References

  1. Алексеев, С.С. 2000. Право на пороге нового тысячелетия: Некоторые тенденции
  2. мирового правового развития – надежда и драма современной эпохи.Москва: Статут, 2000.
  3. Берман Г.Дж. 2008. Вера и закон: примирение права и религии. Москва:Московская школа политических исследований.
  4. Бурдье, П. 2007. Социальное пространство: поля и практики. Санкт-Петербург:Алетейя.
  5. Бурдье П. 2005. Социология социального пространства. Санкт-Петербург: Алетейя.
  6. Кин Дж. 2001. Демократия и гражданское общество. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция.
  7. Ллойд, Д. 2002. Идея права. Москва: Югона.
  8. Нерсесянц, В.С. 1997. Философия права. Москва: НОРМА.Руссо, Ж.-Ж. 2000. Об Общественном договоре: Трактаты. Москва: КАНОН-пресс-Ц.
  9. Руткевич, А.М. 2002. Философия права А. Кожева. Вопросы философии. 12: 144-145.
  10. Страшун, Б.А., отв. ред. 2000. Конституционное (государственное) правозарубежных стран. Тома 1-2. Москва: БЕК.
  11. Фуко М. 2005. Нужно защищать общество: Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де
  12. Франс в 1975-1976 учебном году. Санкт-Петербург: Наука.
  13. Чиркин, В.Е. 1998. Конституционное право: Россия и зарубежный опыт. Москва:Зерцало.
  14. Шмитт, К. 2000. Политическая теология. Москва: КАНОН-пресс-Ц.