Schlagworte
kontrastive Methoden
Fachkommunikation
Textsortenkonventionen
Textualität
Zitationsvorschlag
Abstract
In dem vorliegenden Text wird der Übersetzungsprozess juristischer Texte analysiert. Zunächst definiert der Verfasser juristische Texte und hebt hervor eine besondere Verantwortung, die mit dem Übersetzen dieser Texte einhergeht.
Im ersten Schritt wird die Verbindung zwischen Recht und Staat unterstrichen und darauf hingewiesen, dass dies begriffliche und mithin terminologische Unterschiede bewirkt. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden kontrastive Methoden in den Mittelpunkt gestellt: die Rechtsvergleichung und der terminologische Vergleich. Voraussetzungen beider Herangehensweisen werden erörtert in bezug auf Übersetzung juristischer Texte. Im letzten Schritt betont wird die Rolle von sieben Kriterien der Textualität im Übersetzungsprozess.
Das Ziel des vorliegenden Textes ist es, die Bedeutung kontrastiver Methoden und der Textualitätskriterien für Übersetzung juristischer Texte hervorzuheben. In Fokus geraten hier diejenigen Übersetzungsaspekte, die es ermöglichen, einen mit dem Ausgangstext funktional äquivalenten Zieltext zu erstellen.
Literaturhinweise
Arntz, Reiner. 1999. Rechtsvergleichung und kontrastive Terminologiearbeit: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen interdisziplinären Arbeitens. W Übersetzen von Rechtstexten, red. Sandrini, Peter, 185-201. Tübingen: Narr.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. W The Hastings Law Journal 38, 805-853.
Creifelds Rechtswörterbuch. 2017. München: Beck.
Groot, Gerard-René de. 1985. Probleme juristischer Übersetzungen aus der Perspektive eines Rechtsvergleichers. W (Japanese) Comparative Law Reviev XIX-3, 1-45.
Groot, Gerard-René de. 1990. Die relative Äquivalenz juristischer Begriffe und deren Folge für mehrsprachige juristische Wörterbücher. W Translation and Meaning, Part I, red. Thelen Marcel, i Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 122-128. Maastricht: Euroterm.
Groot, Gérard-René de. 1991. Recht, Rechtssprache und Rechtssystem – Betrachtungen über die Problematik der Übersetzung juristischer Texte. W Terminologie et Traduction 3, 279-316.
Groot, Gérard-René de. 1999. Das Übersetzen juristischer Terminologie. W Recht und Übersetzen, red. Groot, Gérard-René de, i Reiner Schulze, 11-46. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Grossi, Paolo. 2010. A history of European law. Tłum. Laurence Hooper. Chichester: Blackwell.
House, Juliane. 2001. Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description versus social evaluation. W Meta: Journal des traducteurs 46 (2), 243-257.
Mayer, Max Ernst. 1933. Rechtsphilosophie. Berlin: Springer.
Mezey, Naomi. 2001. Law as culture. W The Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 13, 35-67.
Neubert, Albrecht, i Gregory M. Shreve, 1992. Translation as text. Kent: The Kent State University Press.
Olpińska, Magdalena. 2009. Polski i niemiecki język specjalistyczny prawa – możliwości i ograniczenia dydaktyki tłumaczenia tekstów specjalistycznych. W Komunikacja specjalistyczna 2, 79-92.
Otto, Walter. 1981. Die Paradoxie der Fachsprache. W Die Sprache des Rechts und der Verwaltung II: Der öffentliche Sprachgebrauch. 44-57. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating. With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.
Raz, Joseph. 2009. Between Authority and Interpretation. On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reinart, Sylvia, i Wolfgang Pöckl. 2015. Romanische Fachsprachen. Eine Einführung mit Perspektiven aus der Übersetzungswissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Reiß, Katharina, i Hans J. Vermeer. 1984. Grundlegung einer allge-meinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sandrini, Peter. 1996a. Terminologiearbeit im Recht: deskriptiver begriffsorientierter Ansatz vom Standpunkt des Übersetzers. Vienna: TermNet.
Sandrini, Peter. 1996b. Comparative analysis of legal terms: Equivalence revisited. W TKE ‘96: Terminology and Knowledge Engineering. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Wien 26.-28. August 1996, red. Galinski, Christian, i Klaus D. Schmitz, 342–350. Frankfurt: Indeks.
Sandrini, Peter. 1998a. Übersetzung von Rechtstexten: Die Rechtsordnung als Kommunikationsrahmen. W LSP Identity and Interface. Research, Knowledge and Society, 865-876. Kopenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
Sandrini, Peter. 1998b. Terminographie und Textographie: Synergien und Parallelen. W Text, Sprache, Kultur. Festschrift zum 50jährigen Bestehen des Institutes für Übersetzer- und Dolmetscherausbildung der Universität Innsbruck, red. Holzer, Peter, i Cornelia Feyrer, 185-201. Wien: Peter Lang.
Sandrini, Peter. 1999a. Translation zwischen Kultur und Kommunikation: Der Sonderfall Recht. W Übersetzen von Rechtstexten. Fachkommunikation im Spannungsfeld zwischen Rechtsordnung und Sprache, 9-43. Tübingen: Narr.
Sandrini, Peter. 1999b. Legal terminology. Some Aspects for a New Methodology. W Hermes: Journal of Linguistics 22, 101-111.
Sandrini, Peter. 2009. Der transkulturelle Vergleich von Rechtsbegriffen. W Legal Language in Action: Translation, Terminology, Drafting and Procedural Issues, red. Šarčevič, Susan, 151-165. Zagreb: Globus.
Šarčevič, Susan. 1997. New approach to legal translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Šarčevič, Susan. 2000. Legal Translation and Translation Theory: a Receiver-oriented Approach. http://www.tradulex.com/Actes2000/sarcevic.pdf.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1973. Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens. W Das Problem des Übersetzens, red. Stö-rig, Joachim S., 38-69. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Simonnæs, Ingrid. 2013. Legal translation and “traditional” comparative law – Similarities and differences. W Linguistica Antverpiensia: New Series – Themes in Translation Studies 12, 147-160.
Szubert, Rafał. 2008. Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Untersuchungen im Bereich der juristuschen Fachsprache. Dresden-Wrocław: Neisse Verlag.
Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translatorʼs Invisibility. A history of Translation. London: Taylor & Francis.
Wróblewski, Bronisław. 1948. Język prawny i prawniczy, Kraków: PAU.
Zweigert, Konrad, i Hein Kötz. 1996. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Teksty normatywne:
Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego.
Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. - Kodeks postępowania karnego.
Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. - Kodeks karny.
Ustawa z dnia 14 lutergo 1991 r. - Prawo o notariacie.
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 2011 r. - Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe.
Lizenz
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher