CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF THE DISCOURSE OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - REVIEW OF "THE DISCOURSES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION" BY BHATIA V. K., CANDLIN CH. N., GOTTI M. (EDS.)
PDF (Język Polski)

How to Cite

GRZYBEK, J. (2013). CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF THE DISCOURSE OF ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - REVIEW OF "THE DISCOURSES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION" BY BHATIA V. K., CANDLIN CH. N., GOTTI M. (EDS.). Comparative Legilinguistics, 14, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2013.14.07
https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2013.14.07
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Bhatia V. 200 Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based Approach. London: Continuum.

Bhatia V. 2007. Interdiscursivity in Critical Genre Analysis. [W:] Sympósio Internacional de Géneros Yextuais. Anais Proceedings. Tubarão SC (Brazil): UNISUL, 391-400 (@: http://www3. unisul. br/paginas/ensino/pos/linguagem/cd/English/36i. pdf).

Candlin Ch. N., Maley Y. 1997. Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in the Discourse of Alternative Dispute Resolution, [W:] Gunnarsson B. -L., Liness P, Bengt (red.), The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman.

Candlin Ch. N. 2006. Accounting for Interdiscursivity: Challenges to Professional Expertise. [W:] Gotti M. / Giannoni D. (eds.) New Trends in Specialized Discourse Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 21-45.

Fairclough N. 2003. Analysing Discourse – Textual Reasearch for Social Research. New York: Routledge.

Gee J. P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.