Palabras clave
eurolect
Swiss Italian
syntactic complexity
readability
plain language
accessibility
corpus-based study
Cómo citar
Resumen
Translation is often considered as an ally of plain legal language. This corpus-based study sets out to provide empirical support for this hypothesis by comparing different varieties of legislative Italian used in a monolingual context (Italy) and in two multilingual settings (Switzerland and the European Union). The investigation relies primarily on a quantitative analysis of syntax informed by natural language processing (NLP) methods. The results suggest that translated legislation features shorter sentences, fewer nominalizations, an underuse of the passive voice, fewer non-finite clauses, less deep syntactic trees, shorter dependency links, and a preference for the SVO order with an explicit subject. Among the two multilingual contexts, Swiss legislation shows a slightly higher level of accessibility compared to EU directives. A complementary analysis using readability metrics confirms these trends. Nevertheless, in addition to the translation process in multilingual contexts, other latent external variables may have a (hardly quantifiable) impact on the level of accessibility, such as institutional language policies, legal traditions, drafting guidelines, and training programs for translators and language experts.
Citas
Adler, Mark. 2012. The Plain Language Movement. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, eds. Lawrence M. Solan and Peter M. Tiersma, 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006
Ainis, Michele. 1997. La legge oscura. Come e perché non funziona. Rome/Bari: Laterza.
Brunato, Dominique. 2014. Complessità necessaria o stereotipi del burocratese? Un’indagine sulla leggibilità del linguaggio amministrativo da una prospettiva linguistico-computazionale. In: La lingua variabile nei testi letterari, artistici e funzionali contemporanei. Analisi, interpretazione, traduzione. Atti del XIII Congresso SILFI Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana. Palermo, 22–24 settembre 2014, eds. Giovanni Ruffino and Marina Castiglione. Florence: Franco Cesati.
Canavese, Paolo. 2019. LEX.CH.IT. A Corpus for Micro-Diachronic Linguistic Investigations of Swiss Normative Acts in Italian. Comparative Legilinguistics, 40: 43–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2019.40.3
Canavese, Paolo. 2022a. Plain Legal Language through Translation. A Comparison of Swiss, EU and Italian Legislative Texts. In: Contemporary Approaches to Legal Linguistics, eds. Daniel Green and Luke Green, 123–151. Münster: Lit.
Canavese, Paolo. 2022b. L’ordine canonico dei costituenti argomentali nella semplificazione della scrittura normativa. Rivista internazionale di tecnica della traduzione/International Journal of Translation, 24: 197–216.
Canavese, Paolo. 2023a. Atti normativi elvetici nella terza lingua ufficiale. Chiarezza de jure o de facto? PhD dissertation, University of Geneva (Switzerland).
Canavese, Paolo. 2023b. Translation and Clarity in Swiss Multilingual Legislation. A Qualitative Study on Textuality. Translation and Interpreting, 15: 77–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.115202.2023.a05
Cortelazzo, Michele. A., and Federica Pellegrino. 2003. Guida alla scrittura istituzionale. Rome/Bari: Laterza.
Cowan, Nelson. 2010. The Magical Mystery Four. How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, no. 1: 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
Cutts, Martin. 2013. Oxford Guide to Plain English. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Mauro, Tullio. 2016. Il Nuovo vocabolario di base della lingua italiana. Internazionale. https://www.internazionale.it/opinione/tullio-de-mauro/2016/12/23/il-nuovo-vocabolario-di-base-della-lingua-italiana (accessed January 2, 2024).
de Vries, Andrie, and Brian D. Ripley. 2020. ggdendro. Create Dendrograms and Tree Diagrams Using ‘ggplot2’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggdendro/index.html (accessed January 2, 2024).
Dell’Orletta, Felice, Simonetta Montemagni, and Giulia Venturi. 2011. READ-IT. Assessing Readability of Italian Texts with a View to Text Simplification. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies, Edinburgh, 30 July 2011, ed. Norman Alm, 73–83. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W11-2308 (accessed January 2, 2024).
Dell’Orletta, Felice, Simonetta Montemagni, and Giulia Venturi. 2013. Linguistic Profiling of Texts Across Textual Genres and Readability Levels. An Exploratory Study on Italian Fictional Prose. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing RANLP. Hissar, 7–11 September 2013, eds. Galia Angelova, Kalina Bontcheva and Ruslan Mitkov, 189–197. https://aclanthology.org/R13-1025 (accessed January 2, 2024).
Egger, Jean-Luc, and Angela Ferrari. 2016. L’italiano federale svizzero. Elementi per una ricognizione. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata, XLV, no. 3: 499–523.
Everitt, Brian S., Sabine Landau, Morven Leese, and Daniel Stahl. 2011. Cluster analysis. 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977811
Felici, Annarita, and Laura Mori. 2019. Corpora di italiano legislativo a confronto. Dall’Unione europea alla Cancelleria svizzera. In: Le tendenze dell’italiano contemporaneo rivisitate. Atti del LII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Berna, 6–8 settembre 2018, eds. Bruno Moretti, Aline Kunz, Silvia Natale and Etna Krakenberger, 287–304. Milan: Officinaventuno.
Felsenfeld, Carl. 1981. The Plain English Movement in the United States. Canadian Business Law Journal, 6: 408–421. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1475&context=faculty_scholarship (accessed January 3, 2024).
Flückiger, Alexandre. 2005. Le multilinguisme de l’Union européenne. Un défi pour la qualité de la législation. In : Jurilinguistique. Entre langues et droits/Jurilinguistics. Between Law and Language, eds. Jean-Claude Gémar and Nicholas Kasirer, 340–360. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Goffin, Roger. 1997. L’eurolecte: le langage d’une Europe communautaire en devenir. Terminologie et Traduction, no. 1: 63–73. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7f9b3873-3cc8-4d21-8b5e-d589ad4851d6/language-fr/format-PDF/source-search (accessed January 2, 2024).
Gotti, Maurizio. 2005. Investigating Specialized Discourse. Berne: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0214-7
Gries, Stefan T. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307474
Höfler, Stefan. 2016. Die Informationsstruktur von Rechtssätzen und ihre Bedeutung für die Gesetzesredaktion. LeGes, 27, no. 2: 225–251. https://leges.weblaw.ch/legesissues/2016/2/20162225-251.html (accessed January 2, 2024).
IBM Corp. 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 26.0. Computer software.
Ittig, and Accademia della Crusca. 2011. Guida alla redazione degli atti amministrativi. Regole e suggerimenti. Florence: Istituto di teoria e tecniche dell’informazione giuridica del CNR. http://www.ittig.cnr.it/Ricerca/Testi/GuidaAttiAmministrativi.pdf (accessed January 2, 2024).
Kincaid, J. Peter, Richard L. Fishburne, Richard L. Rogers, and Brad S. Chissom. 1975. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. In: Research Branch Report, 8–75. Millington: Chief of Naval Technical Training. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA006655
Lucisano, Pietro, and Maria Emanuela Piemontese. 1988. Gulpease. Una formula per la predizione della difficoltà dei testi in lingua italiana. Scuola e Città, XXXIX, no. 3: 110–124.
Menza, Salvatore, and Laura Mori. 2022. La metaforizzazione del linguaggio giuridico per la costruzione discorsiva dell’identità sovranazionale nel diritto dell’Unione europea. In: L’integrazione europea: tra sfide politiche, vincoli giuridici e legittimazione democratica, eds. Salvatore Menza and Valentina Petralia, 9–36. Florence: Le Monnier Università.
Montemagni, Simonetta. 2013. Tecnologie linguistico-computazionali e monitoraggio della lingua italiana. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XLII, no. 1: 145–172.
Mori, Laura, and Giulia Venturi. 2021. Norme italiane di derivazione europea tra direttive dell’UE e leggi nazionali: un’analisi linguistico-computazionale della variazione intralinguistica. Poster presented at the LIV Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), “Corpora e studi linguistici”, 8–10 September 2021, Università degli Studi di Firenze (Italy).
Mori, Laura. 2003. L’euroletto: genesi e sviluppo dell’italiano comunitario. In: Ecologia linguistica. Atti del XXXVI Convegno internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica italiana, eds. Ada Valentini, Piera Molinelli, Pierluigi Cuzzolin and Giuliano Bernini, 473–492. Roma: Bulzoni.
Mori, Laura. 2018a (ed.). Observing Eurolects. Corpus Analysis of Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.86
Mori, Laura. 2018b. Observing Eurolects. The Case of Italian. In: Observing Eurolects. Corpus Analysis of Linguistic Variation, ed. Laura Mori, 199–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.86.09mor
Mori, Laura. 2019a. Complessità sintattica e leggibilità. Un monitoraggio linguistico per la valutazione dell’accessibilità dei testi legislativi europei e italiani. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XLVIII, no. 3: 627–657.
Mori, Laura. 2019b. Dall’armonizzazione all’ibridazione nei testi legislativi: evidenze linguistiche e manifestazioni interculturali nell’italiano tradotto. Entreculturasi, 10: 377–392. https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/revtracom/article/view/12539 (accessed January 2, 2024).
Mori, Laura. 2021. Prospettive di miglioramento dell’accessibilità linguistica in italiano: verso una cultura della comunicazione istituzionale citizen-centred. In: Comunicare il patrimonio culturale: accessibilità comunicativa, tecnologie, sostenibilità, ed. Franca Orletti, 149–161. Milan: Franco Angeli. https://series.francoangeli.it/index.php/oa/catalog/view/807/653/4708 (accessed January 2, 2024).
Mortara Garavelli, Bice. 2001. Le parole e la giustizia. Divagazioni grammaticali e retoriche su testi giuridici italiani. Turin: Einaudi.
Mortara Garavelli, Bice. 2003. Strutture testuali e stereotipi nel linguaggio forense. In: La lingua, la legge, la professione forense, ed. Alarico Mariani Marini, 3–20. Milan: Giuffrè.
Nussbaumer, Markus. 2000. Textlinguistik für die Gesetzgebung. In: Linguistica giuridica italiana e tedesca/Rechtslinguistik des Deutschen und Italienischen, ed. Daniela Veronesi, 196–208. Padua: Unipress.
OFJ. 2007. Guide de législation. Guide pour l’élaboration de la législation fédérale. 3th ed. Berne: Office fédérale de la justice (OFJ). https://www.bj.admin.ch/dam/bj/fr/data/staat/legistik/hauptinstrumente/gleitf-2007-f.pdf (accessed January 2, 2024).
Piemontese, Maria Emanuela. 1996. Capire e farsi capire. Teorie e tecniche della scrittura controllata. Naples: Tecnodid.
Raso, Tommaso. 2005. La scrittura burocratica. La lingua e l’organizzazione del testo. Rome: Carocci.
Redish, Janice. 1985. The Plain English Movement. In: The English Language Today, ed. Sidney Greenbaum, 125–138. Oxford/New York: Pergamon.
Schmitz, Katrin. 2023. Integrating Technolects in (Micro-)Variation. Null Subjects in Italian National and EU Primary Law Texts. In: From Formal Linguistic Theory to the Art of Historical Editions The Multifaceted Dimensions of Romance Linguistics, eds. Natascha Pomino, Eva-Maria Remberger and Julia Zwink, 127–144. Vienna: V&R unipress, Vienna University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737015530.127
Schnyder, Bernhard. 2001. Zur Mehrsprachigkeit der schweizerischen Gesetzgebung im Allgemeinen. LeGes, 12, no. 3: 33–48. https://leges.weblaw.ch/it/legesissues/2001/3/2001333-48.html (accessed January 2, 2024).
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. On Operationalizing Syntactic Complexity. In: Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve, 10–12 March 2004, eds. Purnelle Gérald, Cédrick Fairon and Anne Dister, 1032–1039. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
van Domselaar, Iris. 2022. “Plain” Legal Language by Courts. Mere Clarity, an Expression of Civic Friendship or a Masquerade of Violence? The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 10, no. 1: 93–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2033946
Venturi, Giulia. 2012a. Design and Development of TEMIS. A Syntactically and Semantically Annotated Corpus of Italian Legislative Texts. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts (SPLeT 2012), held in conjunction with LREC 2012, Istanbul, 27 May 2012, 1–12. http://www.italianlp.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/TEMIS-Venturi.pdf (accessed January 2, 2024).
Venturi, Giulia. 2012b. Investigating Legal Language Peculiarities across Different Types of Italian Legal Texts. An NLP-Based Approach. In: Bridging the Gap(s) between Language and the Law. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguistics. Porto, 15–18 October 2012, eds. Rui Sousa-Silva, Rita Faria, Núria Gavaldà and Belinda Maia, 139–156. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.
Visconti, Jacqueline. 2013. Uno sguardo al contesto europeo: connettivi in testi normativi dell’Unione europea. In: Le forme linguistiche dell’ufficialità. L’italiano giuridico e amministrativo della Confederazione Svizzera, eds. Jean-Luc Egger, Angela Ferrari and Letizia Lala, 67–81. Bellinzona: Casagrande.
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
Williams, Christopher. 2023. The Impact of Plain Language on Legal English in the United Kingdom. London/New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025009
Ziller, Jacques. 2017. Lingue e politica linguistica nell’Unione europea. In: Il linguaggio giuridico nell’Europa delle pluralità. Lingua italiana e percorsi di produzione e circolazione del diritto dell’Unione europea. Atti della Giornata di studio, 21–38. Rome: Senato della Repubblica. https://iris.unito.it/bitstream/2318/1637521/2/BarberaCorinoOnesti2017_LinguisticaGiuridica_senato_compresso.pdf (accessed January 2, 2024).
Ződi, Zsolt. 2019. The Limits of Plain Legal Language. Understanding the Comprehensible Style in Law. International Journal of Law in Context, 15, no. 3: 246–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000260
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Paolo Canavese, Laura Mori
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher