SPECYFIKA DYSKURSU POLUBOWNEGO ROZSTRZYGANIA SPORÓW  W TRYBIE ON-LINE I TRADYCYJNIE - RECENZJA MONOGRAFII POD REDAKCJĄ BHATII V. K., CANDLINA CH. N., GOTTIEGO M., "THE DISCOURSES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION"
PDF (Język Polski)

Comment citer

GRZYBEK, J. (2013). SPECYFIKA DYSKURSU POLUBOWNEGO ROZSTRZYGANIA SPORÓW  W TRYBIE ON-LINE I TRADYCYJNIE - RECENZJA MONOGRAFII POD REDAKCJĄ BHATII V. K., CANDLINA CH. N., GOTTIEGO M., "THE DISCOURSES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION". Comparative Legilinguistics, 14, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2013.14.07
https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2013.14.07
PDF (Język Polski)

Références

Bhatia V. 200 Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based Approach. London: Continuum.

Bhatia V. 2007. Interdiscursivity in Critical Genre Analysis. [W:] Sympósio Internacional de Géneros Yextuais. Anais Proceedings. Tubarão SC (Brazil): UNISUL, 391-400 (@: http://www3. unisul. br/paginas/ensino/pos/linguagem/cd/English/36i. pdf).

Candlin Ch. N., Maley Y. 1997. Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in the Discourse of Alternative Dispute Resolution, [W:] Gunnarsson B. -L., Liness P, Bengt (red.), The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman.

Candlin Ch. N. 2006. Accounting for Interdiscursivity: Challenges to Professional Expertise. [W:] Gotti M. / Giannoni D. (eds.) New Trends in Specialized Discourse Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 21-45.

Fairclough N. 2003. Analysing Discourse – Textual Reasearch for Social Research. New York: Routledge.

Gee J. P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.